Sleep During "Lockdown" in the COVID-19 Pandemic.

The aim of this study was to determine if the lockdown measures applied due to the pandemic of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) affected the sleep of the general population and health professionals in six different countries (Greece, Switzerland, Austria, Germany, France, and Brazil). We used a web-based survey with a short questionnaire of 13 questions, translated into four languages (Greek, German, French, and Portuguese). The questionnaire included information about demographic and professional data, quantitative and qualitative characteristics of sleep, degree of abidance in lockdown measures, and data about illness or close contact with active confirmed cases of COVID-19. Initially, 2093 individuals participated. After exclusion of those who did not report their duration of sleep, the final sample comprised 1908 participants (Greek, n = 1271; German, n = 257, French, n = 48; Portuguese, n = 332), aged 42.6 ± 12.7 years, who were considered for further analysis. A main effect of the lockdown week on sleep duration was observed (+0.25 h; 95% confidence intervals, CI, 0.17, 0.32; p < 0.001), with the total sleep time of the lockdown week being longer than that under normal conditions. A week*occupation interaction on sleep duration was demonstrated (p < 0.001, η2 = 0.012). Sleep duration remained stable in health professionals (-0.18 h; 95% CI -0.36, 0.01; p = 0.063), whereas it increased in other occupations by 0.31 h (95% CI, 0.24, 0.39; p < 0.001). In terms of sleep quality, 15% of participants characterized their sleep as bad and 37.9% as average during the lockdown week. Almost 1 in 3 individuals (31.3%) reported worse quality of sleep during the lockdown week than under normal conditions. Sleep during the lockdown week was characterized as good by 47.1%, but only 38% of the health professionals group. In conclusion, the COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown affected sleep in different ways, depending on age, level of education, occupation, and country of residence.

A health-economic analysis of diagnosis and treatment of obstructive sleep apnea with continuous positive airway pressure in relation to cardiovascular disease. The Greek experience.

PURPOSE: Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) is common in adult population and it is associated with increased morbidity and mortality, especially due to cardiovascular disease (CVD). Both diagnosis, based on polysomnography, and treatment with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), carry a potentially high cost. The present study aims to analyze the cost-effectiveness of CPAP treatment versus no treatment, in the long-term, as it examines the effect of this treatment on the incidence of CVD. METHODS: A Markov model was constructed to observe the disease evolution in patients with OSAS based on published evidence. Data on treatment costs were collected from public hospitals in Greece. Within each cycle of the model, each patient may remain free of CVD, may develop CVD, may die due to a cause related to CVD, or may die from other causes. The model begins at the age of 55 years in a severe OSAS patient (apnea-hypopnea index ≥30/h) and lasts for 45 years. RESULTS: Within the limitation of the model, CPAP was found to be a cost-effective strategy versus no treatment, due to the reduction of the cost for the CVD treatment, when the analysis was restricted to the male population. Moreover, CPAP was found to be clinically more effective than no treatment, as it increases life expectancy in both males and females. CONCLUSIONS: CPAP was found to be clinically more effective therapy than no treatment in relation to CVD and a cost-effective strategy in males with severe OSAS.