Benefits of Integrated RIS/PACS/Reporting Due to Automatic Population of Templated Reports.

With integration of the Radiological Information Systems (RIS), Picture Archiving and Communication systems (PACS), and reporting systems, patient identifiers and examination information can automatically map into examination reports. There are many potential benefits of report automation to radiologists including improvements in efficiency, accuracy, and fatigue. In this article we describe a 2 part study, with the first part being an anonymous survey of radiologists concerning report automation. A total of 13 staff radiologists and 9 radiology residents at a single institution completed an anonymous survey. Respondents were asked if automatic population of examination description, comparison examination data, indications, computed tomography dose, technique, and copy to physician data saved time, decreased fatigue, and increased accuracy. Respondents were asked if a "copy findings" function saved time. The second objective part of the study was a mock examination experiment to assess time savings of report automation and to assess error rates. Of all, 9 radiologists were asked to dictate fields for 8 mock examinations. Subjects were timed and reporting errors monitored. Estimated daily time savings and error rates were calculated assuming a mix of 80 studies. A total of 95% surveyed responded that report automation saved time; 91% that report automation improved accuracy of dictations; 82% that report automation decreased fatigue. Furthermore, 83% of copy finding function users reported time savings. Average time to dictate these prepopulated fields was 51 seconds per study. Average error rate per report was 0.86, with an average of 0.26 errors remaining uncorrected upon report completion. Estimated average time per day saved per radiologist from report automation was 68 minutes. Estimated average corrected errors was 48 per day. Estimated average uncorrected or missed errors was 21 per day. These estimated benefits from report automation result from tight integration of RIS, PACS, and reporting systems.

Image toggling saves time in mammography.

When two images are perfectly aligned, even subtle differences are readily detected when the images are "toggled" back and forth in the same location. However, substantial changes between two photographs can be missed if the images are misaligned ("change blindness"). Nevertheless, recent work from our lab, testing nonradiologists, suggests that toggling misaligned photographs leads to superior performance compared to side-by-side viewing (SBS). In order to determine if a benefit of toggling misaligned images may be observed in clinical mammography, we developed an image toggling technique where pairs of new and prior breast imaging exam images could be efficiently toggled back and forth. Twenty-three radiologists read 10 mammograms evenly divided in toggle and SBS modes. The toggle mode led to a 6-s benefit in reaching a decision [[Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]]. The toggle viewing mode also led to a 5% improvement in diagnostic accuracy, though in our small sample this effect was not statistically reliable. Time savings were found even though successive mammograms were not perfectly aligned. Given the ever-increasing caseload for radiologists, this simple manipulation of how the images are viewed could save valuable time in clinical practice, allowing radiologists to read more cases or spend more time on difficult cases.

Evaluation of lossy data compression in primary interpretation for full-field digital mammography.

OBJECTIVE. For full-field digital mammography (FFDM), federal regulations prohibit lossy data compression for primary reading and archiving, unlike all other medical images, where reading physicians can apply their professional judgment in implementing lossy compression. Faster image transfer, lower costs, and greater access to expert mammographers would result from development of a safe standard for primary interpretation and archive of lossy-compressed FFDM images. This investigation explores whether JPEG 2000 80:1 lossy data compression affects clinical accuracy in digital mammography. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Randomized FFDM cases (n = 194) were interpreted by six experienced mammographers with and without JPEG 2000 80:1 lossy compression applied. A cancer-enriched population was used, with just less than half of the cases (42%) containing subtle (< 1 cm) biopsy-proven cancerous lesions, and the remaining cases were negative as proven by 2-year follow-up. Data were analyzed using the jackknife alternative free-response ROC (JAFROC) method. RESULTS. The differences in reader performance between lossy-compressed and non-lossy-compressed images using lesion localization (0.660 vs 0.671), true-positive fraction (0.879 vs 0.879), and false-positive fraction (0.283 vs 0.271) were not statistically significant. There was no difference in the JAFROC figure of merit between lossy-compressed and non-lossy-compressed images, with a mean difference of -0.01 (95% CI, -0.03 to 0.01; F1,5 = 2.30; p = 0.189). CONCLUSION. These results suggest that primary interpretation of JPEG 2000 80:1 lossy-compressed FFDM images may be viable without degradation of clinical quality. Benefits would include lower storage costs, faster telemammography, and enhanced access to expert mammographers.

PACS in private practice--effect on profits and productivity.

Picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) must be cost effective and productive to be successful. Referring physician and radiologist surveys, return on investment, and change in technical FTE productivity is evaluated. Referring physicians nearly unanimously prefer PACS over film, with productivity improvements claimed by 91%. Radiologists glean nearly 100% increased efficiency for computed tomography (CT), ultrasound, and Magnetic resonance imaging, and 50% for special procedures. Technologist productivity increased by 58% for MRI, 30% for CT, and 41% for ultrasound. Four-year experience with PACS reveals great success, with phase I return on investment after 3.5 years and more than $500,000 saved annually thereafter. There was instant conversion to 100% filmless interpretation and archive for all modalities on connection to PACS.

Are referring doctors ready for enterprise and community wide immediate image and report access?

At most medical centers film-based radiology requires that single or multiple copies of patient exams and reports be distributed for results communication. A successful picture archiving and communication system (PACS) should provide a means to improve upon this inefficient paradigm, with universal access to imagery and exam results on demand at the user's convenience. Enterprise and community-wide experience with universal PACS access is reviewed. Referring physicians were surveyed about their experience with PACS, with regard to acceptance, productivity, frequency of usage, and impact on patient care. Web audit trails were used to assess physician usage. Film printing logs were reviewed. The filmless paradigm was highly regarded and frequently used by nearly all users. Significant productivity benefits were gleaned by all of the referring physicians. Patient quality of care benefitted from more efficient communication of results. Very small quantities of film were used for printing of exams, typically for patient copies.