Comparison of Tocilizumab vs Baricitinib in Clinical Outcomes Among Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19: Experience From a Public Hospital System in New York City.

Background: Tocilizumab and baricitinib are immunomodulators that have been repurposed for the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Whether one medication should be preferred over the other has not been established. Methods: This multicenter retrospective cohort study comprised hospitalized patients with COVID-19 who received either tocilizumab or baricitinib. The primary outcome was improvement in respiratory status (at least 1-point reduction on the respiratory ordinal scale) at day 7 and up to day 28. Secondary outcomes included mortality, disposition, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, or positive blood culture. Outcomes were stratified by baseline respiratory status and variant-predominating periods. Results were reported for the overall and propensity-matched cohorts. Results: A total of 921 patients received tocilizumab and 638 received baricitinib. The propensity-matched cohort included 597 patients in each group. At day 7 in the overall and propensity-matched cohorts, significantly more patients had improvement in respiratory status in the baricitinib group. These improvements were seen in patients requiring supplemental oxygen and noninvasive ventilation/high-flow oxygen but not in patients requiring mechanical ventilation. Favorable outcomes with baricitinib were observed during the Alpha and Omicron periods. By day 28, there were no differences in the changes of respiratory status for the treatment groups in either cohort. Also, no differences were seen in mortality, disposition, development of deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism, or bloodstream infections. Conclusions: Baricitinib treatment was associated with more favorable respiratory improvement at day 7 when compared with tocilizumab, but no differences were observed up to day 28.

Effect of Dopamine Agonists on Lactotroph Adenomas of the Human Pituitary.

Dopamine (DA) agonists cause reduction of blood prolactin level and tumor shrinkage in most patients with lactotroph adenoma. Our aim was to investigate the cellular mechanism of tumor shrinkage by determining mitotic, MIB-1, p27, and apoptotic indices, as well as microvessel density (MVD), surface microvessel density (SMD). ploidy, and other nuclear parameters. Surgically removed lactotroph adenomas were selected from 29 patients, of whom 19 were treated with oral bromocriptine (BEC), long-acting injectable BEC (BEC-LAR), or quinagolide and 10 were untreated. In treated adenomas mitotic and MIB-1 indices were lower, whereas the apoptotic indices were not significantly higher compared to untreated adenomas. The decrease in MIB-1 labeling reached significance in adenomas exposed to quinagolide (p<0.05). Aside from the BEC-LAR treated group, wherein p27 expression was significantly reduced (p<0.05), p27 expression did not differ significantly between the treated and untreated groups. MVD density was significantly lower in the treated adenomas, whereas the decrease in SMD did not attain significance. The DNA ploidy and most other nuclear parameters did not differ significantly in the two groups. In conclusion, reduction of mitotic and MIB-1 indices indicates that suppression of cell proliferation contributes to tumor shrinkage, whereas p27 protein expression and apoptosis play no major role in the adenoma involution. Further studies are required to explain the effect of DA agonists on MVD and SMD.