Analysis of suicidality in pooled data from 2 double-blind, placebo-controlled aripiprazole adjunctive therapy trials in major depressive disorder.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of adjunctive aripiprazole versus adjunctive placebo treatment on suicidality in patients with major depressive disorder. METHOD: Data were pooled from 2 identical aripiprazole augmentation studies. Patients with DSM-IV-TR-diagnosed major depressive disorder with an inadequate response to 8 weeks of prospective antidepressant treatment were randomly assigned to adjunctive placebo or adjunctive aripiprazole (2-20 mg/d) treatment for 6 weeks. Adverse events related to suicidality were identified in the adverse event database using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities-preferred term. Treatment-emergent suicidal ideation was defined using item 10 (suicidality) of the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and item 18 (suicidality) of the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (IDS). RESULTS: In total, 737 patients were included in the safety database (aripiprazole n = 371; placebo n = 366). No suicides were reported. There were no treatment-emergent, suicide-related adverse events in the aripiprazole group; 2 patients in the placebo group had ≥ 1 adverse event related to suicide (both suicidal ideation). More placebo than aripiprazole patients > 25 years old experienced a 2-point (P < .01) or 1-point (P < .05) worsening of MADRS item 10 scores. For this age group, 2-point improvement in MADRS item 10 scores and 1-point improvement of IDS item 18 scores were significantly more common in aripiprazole patients than placebo patients (both P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: This post hoc analysis demonstrated that adjunctive aripiprazole treatment in patients with depression with a history of an inadequate response to antidepressant medication is associated with a decreased rate of suicidality in a group of subjects not at significant risk. Prospective trials directly assessing suicidality are needed to further understand the benefits of an adjunctive antipsychotic in an at-risk population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifiers: NCT00095823 and NCT00095758.

Predictive value of early improvement in bipolar depression trials: a post-hoc pooled analysis of two 8-week aripiprazole studies.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the value of early improvement to predict treatment outcome in patients with bipolar depression. METHODS: Data were pooled from two aripiprazole, 8-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials in patients with bipolar depression without psychotic features to determine whether early improvement (≥20% reduction in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total score at Week 2 or 3) predicts later response (≥50% MADRS Total score reduction at Week 8) or remission (MADRS Total ≤10 at Week 8). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated (LOCF). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to evaluate early improvement and baseline demographic/clinical characteristics as predictors of response/remission. RESULTS: In total, 311 patients were randomized to placebo and 306 to aripiprazole. Predictive values of early improvement (≥20% MADRS Total score reduction) for remission with aripiprazole at Week 2/3, respectively, were: sensitivity 83%/94%; specificity 41%/33%; PPV 44%/45%; NPV 81%/91%. The corresponding values with placebo were as follows: sensitivity 70%/84%; specificity 60%/51%; PPV 50%/51%; NPV 77%/84%. Univariate linear regression showed that early improvement (≥15%, ≥20%, ≥25%, ≥30% at Week 3) was a significant potential predictor of remission. CONCLUSION: Absence of early improvement after 3 weeks of treatment reliably predicted non-response/non-remission at study endpoint with high sensitivity and NPV. In patients with <20% improvement after 21 days of aripiprazole monotherapy, treatment should be modified, as continued use is unlikely to result in response/remission. Clinical decision-making to optimize treatment course in bipolar I depression may be appropriate after as little as 2 weeks and certainly within the first 3 weeks of treatment.

Catheter based intracoronary brachytherapy leads to increased platelet activation.

BACKGROUND: Vascular brachytherapy (VBT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with a higher risk of stent thrombosis than conventional treatment. OBJECTIVE: To investigate in vivo periprocedural platelet activation with and without VBT, and to assess a possible direct effect of radiation on platelet activation. DESIGN: Of 50 patients with stable angina, 23 received VBT after PCI, while 27 had PCI only. The 23 patients who received VBT after PCI were pretreated for one month with aspirin and clopidogrel. Platelet activation was assessed by flow cytometry. RESULTS: The two patient groups did not differ in their platelet activation before the intervention. There was a significant increase in activation immediately after VBT, with 21.2% (interquartile range 13.0% to 37.6%) thrombospondin positive and 54.0% (42.3% to 63.6%) CD 63 positive platelets compared with 12.7% (9.8% to 14.9%) thrombospondin positive and 37.9% (33.2% to 45.2%) CD 63 positive platelets before the intervention (p < 0.001 and p < 0.01, respectively). Patients without VBT had no periprocedural difference in platelet activation immediately after PCI. No increase in platelet activation was found after ex vivo irradiation of blood samples obtained from healthy controls. CONCLUSIONS: Catheter based intracoronary VBT carried out according to current standards is highly thrombogenic. The current antithrombotic treatment with aspirin and clopidogrel is not sufficient to suppress platelet activation during the procedure. From in vitro experiments, it appears that platelet activation during brachytherapy is not caused by irradiation but by the procedure of catheter based VBT.