Standardizing process in acute biliary disease.

INTRODUCTION: The perioperative management of biliary disease (BD) is variable across institutions with suboptimal outcomes for patients and health care systems. This results in inefficient utilization of limited resources. The aim of the current study was to identify modifiable factors impacting patients' time to theater, intraoperative time, and time to discharge as the constituents of length of stay to guide creation of a perioperative management protocol to address this variability. METHODS: Data were prospectively captured at Christchurch Hospital for all adult patients presenting for cholecystectomy between May 2015 and May 2022. Pre, post, and intraoperative factors were assessed for their impact on time to theater, operative time, and postoperative hours to discharge. RESULTS: Four thousand five hundred seventy-seven patients underwent cholecystectomy during the study period, of which 2807 (61%) were acute presentations and made up the cohort for analysis. Time to theater was significantly impacted by preoperative imaging type, while operative grade and the procedure type had the most clinically significant impact on operative time. Postoperatively time to discharge was significantly impacted by drain placement. CONCLUSIONS: Standardizing management of BD would likely result in significant savings for the health care system and improved outcomes for patients. The data seen here evidence the importance of appropriate imaging selection, intraoperative difficulty operative grade identification, and low suction drain selection. These data have been incorporated in a perioperative management protocol as standardization of care across the patient workflow in BD is a sensible approach for ensuring optimal use of scarce resources.

The utility of synoptic operation reports in colorectal surgery: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: Accurate documentation is crucial in surgical patient care. Synoptic reports (SR) are structured checklist-based reports that offer a standardised alternative to traditional narrative reports (NR). This systematic review aims to assess the completeness of SR compared to NR in colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery. Secondary outcomes include the time to completion, surgeon satisfaction, educational value, research value, and barriers to implementation. METHODS: Prospective or retrospective studies that assessed SR compared to NR in colorectal cancer surgery procedures were identified through a systematic search of Ovid MEDLINE, Embase (Ovid), CIHNAL Plus with Full Text (EBSCOhost), and Cochrane. One thousand two articles were screened, and eight studies met the inclusion criteria after full-text review of 17 papers. RESULTS: Analysis included 1797 operative reports (NR, 729; SR, 1068). Across studies reporting this outcome, the completeness of documentation was significantly higher in SR (P < 0.001). Reporting of secondary outcomes was limited, with a predominant focus on research value. Several studies demonstrated significantly reduced data extraction times when utilising SR. Surgeon satisfaction with SR was high, and these reports were seen as valuable tools for research and education. Barriers to implementation included integrating SR into existing electronic medical records (EMR) and surgeon concerns regarding increased administrative burden. CONCLUSIONS: SR offer advantages in completeness, data extraction, and communication compared to NR. Surgeons perceive them as beneficial for research, quality improvement, and teaching. This review supports the necessity for development of user-friendly SR that seamlessly integrate into pre-existing EMRs, optimising patient care and enhancing the quality of CRC surgical documentation.

3D visualization systems improve operator efficiency during difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a retrospective blinded review of surgical videos.

BACKGROUND: 3D visualization systems in laparoscopic surgery have been proposed to improve manual task handling compared to 2D, however, few studies have compared the intra-operative efficacy in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). The aim of this study is to determine if there is a benefit in intra-operative efficiency when using a 3D visualization system in difficult LC compared to traditional 2D visualization systems. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 'difficult' LCs (Grades 3 or 4) was completed. The assessor was blinded as all cases were recorded and viewed in 2D only. Variables collected included time to complete steps, missed hook diathermy attempts, failed grasp attempts, missed clip attempts and preparation steps for intra-operative cholangiogram (IOC). Multiple linear regression was undertaken for time variables, Poisson regression or negative binomial regression was completed for continuous variables. RESULTS: Fifty-two operative videos of 'difficult' LC were reviewed. 3D systems were associated with reduced operative times, although this was not statistically significant (CI: -2.93-14.93, P-value = 0.183). Dissection of the anterior fold to achieve the critical view of safety was significantly faster by 3.55 min (CI: 1.215-9.206, P-value = 0.002), and with considerably fewer errors when using 3D systems. Fewer IOC preparation errors were observed with a 3D system compared with a 2D system. CONCLUSIONS: 3D systems appear to enhance operator efficiency, allowing faster completion of critical steps with fewer errors. This pilot study underscores the utility of video annotation for intra-operative assessment and suggests that, in larger multi-centre studies, 3D systems may demonstrate superior intra-operative efficiency over 2D systems during a 'difficult' LC.

The artery first technique: re-examining the critical view of safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Significant discrepancies exist between surgeon-documented and actual rates of critical view of safety (CVS) achievement on retrospective review following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This discrepancy may be due to surgeon utilisation of the artery first technique (AFT), an exception to the CVS first described by Strasberg et al. The present study aims to characterise the use of the AFT, hypothesising it is used as an adjunct in difficult dissections to maximise exposure of the hepato-cystic triangle ensuring safe cholecystectomy. METHODS: Prospective digital recording of the operative procedure of patients' undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were undertaken at Christchurch Public Hospital, New Zealand and North Shore Private Hospital, Sydney, Australia. Videos were uploaded to Touch Surgery™ Enterprise. Difficulty was graded, annotated and indications for the AFT quantified using a standardised protocol. RESULTS: A total of 275 annotated procedures were included in this study. The AFT was employed in 54 (20%) patients; in 13 (24%) patients for bleeding, in 35 (65%) patients where windows one and two were visible, and in 6 (11%) patients no windows were visible within the hepato-cystic triangle. There were significant differences in utilisation across operative grade and by seniority of operator (p < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: The data presented here demonstrate the AFT is frequently used, particularly with Grade 3 cholecystectomy. However, more data are needed to confirm the utility and safety of this approach. Analysis of the AFT shows that to understand and improve safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy appreciating how the operation was undertaken and not just that the CVS was achieved is crucial.

Use of prospective video analysis to understand the impact of technical difficulty on operative process during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

BACKGROUND: An understanding of the impact of operative difficulty on operative process in laparoscopic cholecystectomy is lacking. The aim of the present study was to prospectively analyse digitally recorded laparoscopic cholecystectomy to assess the impact of operative technical difficulty on operative process. METHODS: Video of laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures performed at Christchurch Hospital, NZ and North Shore Private Hospital, Sydney Australia were prospectively recorded. Using a framework derived from a previously published standard process video was annotated using a standardized template and stratified by operative grade to evaluate the impact of grade on operative process. RESULTS: 317 patients had their laparoscopic cholecystectomy operations prospectively recorded. Seventy one percent of these videos (n = 225) were annotated. Single ICC of operative grade was 0.760 (0.663-0.842 p < 0.010). Median operative time, rate of operative errors significantly increased and rate of CVS decreased with increasing operative grade. Significant differences in operative anatomy, operative process and instrumentation were seen with increasing grade. CONCLUSION: Operative technical difficulty is accurately predicted by operative grade and this impacts on operative process with significant implications for both surgeons and patients. Consequently operative grade should be documented routinely as part of a culture of safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

What a headache! Reviewing mild traumatic brain injury management in a new trauma service.

AIM: Mild traumatic brain injury (mild TBI) is a common, poorly managed condition with an underestimated impact and inadequate follow-up. This study aimed to assess local practice in terms of assessment and follow-up. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients presenting to Christchurch Hospital between 1 August 2019 and 30 September 2019 with ICD-10 coded diagnosis of head trauma was conducted. Patients younger than 16 or older than 80 years who had a concurrent medical illness or who did not meet diagnostic criteria for mild TBI were excluded. This was to minimise diagnostic uncertainty where patients may have had mild TBI like symptoms due to alternate pathology. Primary outcomes included documentation of post-traumatic amnesia (PTA) with the Abbreviated Westmead Post-Traumatic Amnesia Scale (A-WPTAS), provision of mild TBI information, the proportion referred for follow-up and the proportion followed up at the mild TBI clinic. Demographic data included age, sex, ethnicity, mechanism of injury, admission service and rate of admission. RESULTS: A total of 525 patients were identified, with 239 patients included. Median age was 29 years (IQR 22-50) and 65.3% (n=156) were male. The most common mechanisms of injury were falls (25.5%, n=61) and assault (25.5%, n=61). The most-commonly recorded diagnosis was head injury (41.4%, n=99), followed by concussion (34.3%, n=82). A-WPTAS was documented for 4.2% of patients (n=10). The provision of written mild TBI advice to patients was documented in 61.5% of cases (n=147). On discharge, no follow-up was documented for 63.6% of patients (n=152). In those with documented follow-up, 23.4% (n=56) was with a general practitioner (GP) and 5.4% (n=13) were referred to mild TBI clinic. Review of Accident Corporation Commission (ACC) records identified claims for 80.3% (n=192) of the cohort. Of these, 11.5% (n=22) received a payment for mild TBI services and 2.1% (n=4) had their service provided by Christchurch Hospital. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that current management of mild TBI at Christchurch Hospital needs improvement. Accurate diagnostic coding allows patients to access ACC-funded clinics. The utilisation rates of these clinics confirm that the frequency of specialist follow-up is low, which is in keeping with the international literature. Furthermore, given the strongly predictive nature of post-traumatic amnesia for outcomes, the low rate of A-WPTAS assessment is concerning. These results suggest that a mild TBI protocol is needed to standardise assessment, management and follow-up.

The Challenges of Implementing Artificial Intelligence into Surgical Practice.

BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence is touted as the future of medicine. Classical algorithms for the detection of common bile duct stones (CBD) have had poor clinical uptake due to low accuracy. This study explores the challenges of developing and implementing a machine-learning model for the prediction of CBD stones in patients presenting with acute biliary disease (ABD). METHODS: All patients presenting acutely to Christchurch Hospital over a two-year period with ABD were retrospectively identified. Clinical data points including lab test results, demographics and ethnicity were recorded. Several statistical techniques were utilised to develop a machine-learning model. Issues with data collection, quality, interpretation and barriers to implementation were identified and highlighted. RESULTS: Issues with patient identification, coding accuracy, and implementation were encountered. In total, 1315 patients met inclusion criteria. Incorrect international classification of disease 10 (ICD-10) coding was noted in 36% (137/382) of patients recorded as having CBD stones. Patients with CBD stones were significantly older and had higher aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), bilirubin and gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) levels (p < 0.001). The no information rate was 81% (1070/1315 patients). The optimum model developed was the gradient boosted model with a PPV of 67%, NPV of 87%, sensitivity of 37% and a specificity of 96% for common bile duct stones. CONCLUSION: This paper highlights the utility of machine learning in predicting CBD stones. Accuracy is limited by current data and issues do exist around both the ethics and practicality of implementation. Regardless, machine learning represents a promising new paradigm for surgical practice.

Introduction and validation of a surgical ward round checklist to improve surgical ward round performance in a tertiary vascular service.

BACKGROUND: Surgeons administer care in an increasingly complex clinical environment. Time constraints put strain on individual clinicians and the multidisciplinary team, increasing the risk of human errors. The World Health Organization surgical checklist has shown to mitigate this risk perioperatively. We describe the development, introduction and outcomes of a novel ward round safety checklist. METHODS: The vascular team ward rounds at Christchurch Hospital were assessed over a 2-week period for ward round quality indicators. A ward round safety checklist was developed and then introduced. Two further assessments were conducted to evaluate for improvement in the ward round quality indicators. Ward rounds were timed with the length of each consultation recorded and staff perception assessed. RESULTS: Significant gains across both clinical indicators and staff feedback measures were observed. Of the 21 ward round quality indicators, 20 showed statistically significant improvement, as did all subjective measures. Significant improvements included observation chart review (20% to 75% to 81%), drug chart review (10% to 54% to 78.6%) and anticoagulation/antiplatelet treatment (32% to 61% to 58.1%) (P < 0.05). Mean consultation time per patient did not increase (3 min 58 s to 3 min 48 s and 4 min 30 s) (P = 0.857 and P = 0.119). CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence that introducing a structured ward round safety checklist improved ward round quality, without adversely affecting consultation time. The familiar checklist structure promotes its acceptance and team cohesion. Whether the improvements observed translate to improved patient outcomes and reduced adverse events reporting is the subject of ongoing study.

Long-term incidence of dysplasia and colorectal cancer in an ulcerative colitis population-based cohort.

BACKGROUND: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a risk factor in developing colorectal cancer (CRC). Surveillance programmes aim to identify premalignant lesions to facilitate improved treatment outcomes. Recent studies have suggested that the risk of CRC in UC has decreased. This study aims to characterize the risk of CRC in UC in a population-based New Zealand cohort. METHODS: All patients in the Canterbury Inflammatory Bowel Disease Study, a comprehensive population-based cohort, were reviewed and cases of dysplasia and CRC identified. Demographic data and risk factors were assessed and standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) calculated comparing with the national population. RESULTS: A total of 518 UC cases were analysed (46.3% female). Median follow-up was 17.5 years (interquartile range 12.2-25.1 years). Neoplasia developed in 42 (8.1%) patients, 14 (2.7%) of whom had CRC. The mean age at CRC diagnosis was 63.3 years, and mean duration with UC before CRC 18.4 years (0-36.8 years). The total incidence rate was 1.35/1000 person-year duration (95% confidence interval 0.74-2.27). The age-adjusted SIR was 1.74 (95% confidence interval 1.03-2.93) compared to the New Zealand population. Risk factors for any dysplasia included disease extent and male gender. CONCLUSION: In this population-based cohort with long-term follow-up, the SIR of CRC in UC patients was significantly lower than the initial epidemiological studies although similar to more recent studies. This increased risk still justifies ongoing screening in the UC population.

Video head impulse in comparison to caloric testing in unilateral vestibular schwannoma.

CONCLUSIONS: Although there was a statistically significant relationship between the results of the vHIT and the caloric test, the limited strength of this relationship suggests that, for unilateral vestibular schwannoma (UVS), caloric testing and vHIT may provide complementary information on vestibular function. OBJECTIVE: There is limited information that can be used to determine which of the video head impulse test (vHIT) and caloric test might be better used in the diagnosis and management of UVS. In this study, a group of participants with un-operated UVS was studied using both methods. METHODS: The subjects' vestibular function was assessed using the vHIT and caloric testing. Tumour size was quantified using MRI and their balance disturbance assessed using the Jacobsen Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI). RESULTS: Twenty of 30 subjects had an abnormal canal paresis according to the Jongkees' criterion (> 0.25); however, only 10/30 had an ipsilesional vHIT gain of <0.79. Canal paresis could be predicted from the ipsilesional and contralesional vHIT gains. Tumour size could also be predicted from the ipsilesional vHIT gain and canal paresis. However, DHI scores could not be predicted from the degree of canal paresis, vHIT gain, or the MRI measures.