ABSTRACT
In vitro measurements of skin absorption are an increasingly important aspect of regulatory studies, product support claims, and formulation screening. However, such measurements are significantly affected by skin variability. The purpose of this study was to determine inter- and intralaboratory variation in diffusion cell measurements caused by factors other than skin. This was attained through the use of an artificial (silicone rubber) rate-limiting membrane and the provision of materials including a standard penetrant, methyl paraben (MP), and a minimally prescriptive protocol to each of the 18 participating laboratories. "Standardized" calculations of MP flux were determined from the data submitted by each laboratory by applying a predefined mathematical model. This was deemed necessary to eliminate any interlaboratory variation caused by different methods of flux calculations. Average fluxes of MP calculated and reported by each laboratory (60 +/- 27 microg cm(-2) h(-1), n = 25, range 27-101) were in agreement with the standardized calculations of MP flux (60 +/- 21 microg cm(-2) h(-1), range 19-120). The coefficient of variation between laboratories was approximately 35% and was manifest as a fourfold difference between the lowest and highest average flux values and a sixfold difference between the lowest and highest individual flux values. Intralaboratory variation was lower, averaging 10% for five individuals using the same equipment within a single laboratory. Further studies should be performed to clarify the exact components responsible for nonskin-related variability in diffusion cell measurements. It is clear that further developments of in vitro methodologies for measuring skin absorption are required.
Subject(s)
Clinical Laboratory Techniques/standards , Observer Variation , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/statistics & numerical data , Diffusion , Diffusion Chambers, Culture/methods , Diffusion Chambers, Culture/standards , Diffusion Chambers, Culture/statistics & numerical data , Internationality , Quality Control , Reference Standards , Reference Values , Skin Absorption/physiologyABSTRACT
Low density lipoproteins (LDL) from hypertensive patients are more prone to in vitro oxidation and undergo a more pronounced oxidation in vivo. Due to the pro-atherogenic activity of oxidatively modified LDL, the correlation between the carotid intima-media thickening (IMT) and the markers of in vivo LDL oxidation was investigated in hypertensive patients. A cross-sectional study on 101 normocholesterolemic patients with newly diagnosed and untreated essential hypertension was performed. The occurrence of in vivo LDL oxidation was evaluated by measuring the titers of autoantibodies against Cu(2+)-oxidised LDL (oxLDL) and malondialdehyde-derivatised LDL (MDA-LDL). The extent and degree of atherosclerosis and the IMT were measured by means of carotid and femoral ultrasonography with a duplex scanner equipped with a high resolution probe. We did not find significant correlations between in vivo LDL oxidation parameters and the extent of atherosclerotic lesion in the entire group of hypertensive patients. However, a significant direct correlation was detected between the carotid IMT and the titer of autoantibodies against both oxLDL and MDA-LDL in hypertensive patients without advanced atherosclerotic plaques. The results obtained support the hypothesis that enhanced LDL oxidation may be one of the pathophysiological events related to the formation and progression of early atherosclerotic lesions (IMT) in carotid arteries of hypertensive patients.
