Surgical technique and the mechanism of atrial tachycardia late after open heart surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Diverse atrial tachycardias (ATs) can develop after open heart surgery. The aim of our study was to examine the determinants of the mechanism of postoperative AT. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred patients with AT occurring at least 3 months after open heart surgery were studied. Patients were grouped according to the atrial incision applied at the time of surgery. During 127 electrophysiology procedures, 151 ATs were studied. Eighty-eight patients had cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI)-dependent atrial flutter (AFL), 49 patients had at least one non-CTI-dependent AFL and 11 patients had focal AT. While CTI-dependent AFL was equally prevalent across groups, the finding of a non-CTI-dependent AFL was progressively more common as more extensive atriotomy was applied (p < 0.001). Among patients who had right atrial (RA) operations, RA incisional tachycardia was the most common non-CTI-dependent circuit, while the finding of perimitral or left atrial (LA) roof-dependent AFL was associated with LA atriotomy (p = 0.002 and p = 0.041, respectively). After adjustment for possible confounders, surgical group remained independent predictor of non-CTI-dependent AFLs (p < 0.001). No predictor was identified for focal AT, which originated from typical predilection sites and in 36% from the vicinity of surgical scar. Radiofrequency ablation was highly effective for all ATs, but the recurrence rate of AFL and atrial fibrillation was high at 22% and 27%, respectively, during 19 ± 15 months of follow-up. CONCLUSION: While CTI-dependent AFL is the most common AT late after open heart surgery, atypical AFL becomes progressively more common with more extensive atriotomy. Right atrial incisional tachycardia is the dominant non-CTI-dependent AFL after opening of the RA, while a perimitral or roof-dependent LA circuit can be expected after LA operations.

Electrogram analysis at the His bundle region and the proximal coronary sinus as a tool to predict left atrial origin of focal atrial tachycardias.

AIMS: Early activation at the His bundle (HB) region or proximal coronary sinus (CS) during focal atrial tachycardias (FATs) often necessitates biatrial mapping. Analysis of CS electrograms (EGMs) consisting of a near-field (N) component from CS musculature and a far-field (F) component from left atrial (LA) myocardium can uncover LA activation preceding right atrial (RA) activation. A similar pattern might be observed at the HB. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eight patients underwent RA and LA pacing testing the hypothesis that N and F components originating from the RA and LA septum are present in the HB atrial EGM (Pacing group). In this group N preceded F (N-F sequence) in all, while F preceded N (F-N sequence) in seven of eight patients during RA and LA pacing, respectively. Twenty-seven patients with FAT demonstrating earliest activation at the HB or proximal CS during limited RA mapping were also studied (FAT group). Two observers analysed the EGMs at the earliest site during FAT. They found an N-F sequence in 17 (94%) and 16 (89%) of 18 RA FAT and an F-N sequence in seven (78%) and eight (89%) of nine LA FAT, respectively. The F-N sequence predicted the need for LA access with a sensitivity of 78 and 89% and a specificity of 94 and 89%. CONCLUSION: Near-field and F components from RA and LA activation can be identified in the HB atrial EGM. Earliest atrial EGM analysis at the HB or CS can predict the need for LA access during FAT ablation.

Ventricular location of a part of the right atrial isthmus after tricuspid valve replacement for Ebstein's anomaly: a challenge for atrial flutter ablation.

We report the case of a patient with atrial flutter late after tricuspid valve replacement for Ebstein's anomaly. Computed tomographic angiography revealed that coronary sinus ostium and part of the right atrial isthmus were located on the ventricular side of the valve ring due to the specific surgical approach in this condition. Based on the results of electroanatomic mapping and entrainment, the arrhythmia was found to be cavotricuspid isthmus dependent clockwise atrial flutter. Completion of the isthmus line required ablation lesions across the artificial valve. When these were delivered the arrhythmia terminated and isthmus block was achieved. Due to arrhythmia recurrence a redo procedure was performed which demonstrated conduction recovery in the ventricular part of the cavotricuspid isthmus. Intracardiac ultrasound-guided ablation successfully eliminated conduction across the isthmus with subsequent freedom from arrhythmia on follow up.

A simple algorithm for defining the mechanism and the chamber of origin in atrial tachycardias.

INTRODUCTION: Although macroreentrant atrial tachycardia (MRAT) and focal atrial tachycardia (FAT) can be successfully cured by catheter ablation, the proper diagnosis and treatment of these arrhythmias can still be challenging. AIM: The objective of this study is to develop an algorithm allowing rapid diagnosis of the mechanism and the chamber of origin of atrial tachycardia based on intracardiac catheter recordings from the right atrium and the coronary sinus (CS). METHODS: A 2-stepped algorithm was designed: (1) The time of biatrial activation expressed as a percentage of the tachycardia cycle length served to discriminate FAT from MRAT. (2) In FAT, the direction of activation of the CS catheter and the earliest atrial activation were used to define the chamber of origin. In MRAT, the time of right atrium activation was determined or entrainment was used at different sites. Thirty-two intracardiac recordings were reviewed off-line after the algorithm by 4 electrophysiologists blinded to the mechanism and the chamber of origin. The results of their analysis were compared with the intraoperative diagnosis. RESULTS: The algorithm correctly identified 11 (100%) of 11 FATs and 19 (90.4%) of 21 MRATs. The site of origin was correctly identified in 8 (72.7%) of 11 FATs and in 20 of 21 (95.2%) MRATs. The site of origin was misidentified in 3 FATs, all arising from the CS ostium. CONCLUSIONS: This algorithm allows rapid discrimination between FAT and MRAT. The chamber of origin is detected with a high accuracy in MRAT. However, the earliest atrial activation taken as an isolated event is not a good predictor for the chamber of origin in FAT arising from the ostium of the CS.