Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Pharm Pract ; : 8971900241256776, 2024 May 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38789106

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Diabetes is associated with increased risk of hospital readmission and imposes a significant economic burden on patients and healthcare systems. Literature suggests that pharmacist-led transitions-of-care (TOC) services reduce hospital readmissions and improve patient outcomes and data within safety-net hospitals is limited. METHODS: This was a single-center evaluation to assess the impact of pharmacist-led diabetes TOC services on hospital readmissions among diabetes patients vs standard care (SC). The evaluation included patients admitted from 11/1/2021-2/28/2022 and 10/19/2022-2/28/2023 who had a primary diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, were admitted for a diabetes-related reason, or were seen by the endocrine consult service during admission. The primary outcome was 30-day readmissions. Secondary outcomes included time to readmission, readmission diagnosis, changes in HbA1c, completion of follow-up visits, and number of pharmacist interventions at follow-up. RESULTS: There were 109 patients included (TOC n = 65; SC n = 44) and 13.8% (9/65) of TOC and 18.2% (8/44) of SC patients readmitted within 30 days (P = .235). Average time to readmission was 15.3 days in the TOC and 10.4 days in the SC cohorts. There were no diabetes-related readmissions in the TOC cohort. Over 60% (5/8) of readmissions in the SC cohort were diabetes-related. The average change in HbA1c was -2.5% in the TOC cohort and -1.2% in the SC cohort, P = .046. Approximately 51% of TOC patients completed an outpatient follow-up visit and nearly 70% of those patients had an intervention made at that time. CONCLUSION: Pharmacist-led diabetes TOC services within a safety-net hospital may reduce hospital readmissions and improve clinical outcomes.

2.
Am J Health Syst Pharm ; 68(14): 1307-19, 2011 Jul 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21719591

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Published evidence on the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of fibromyalgia is reviewed, with an emphasis on recent clinical trials of various pharmacologic agents. SUMMARY: Fibromyalgia affects an estimated 2% of the general U.S. population, and its incidence is sevenfold higher among women. The diagnostic characteristics of fibromyalgia are chronic widespread pain, thought to arise from abnormalities of ascending pain and descending inhibitory sensory pathways, and allodynia on palpation of specific tender points. Three medications available in the United States are labeled for treatment of fibromyalgia-related symptoms: the serotonin- and norepinephrine-reuptake inhibitors duloxetine and milnacipran and the α(2)-δ ligand pregabalin. Evidence from clinical trials indicates that all three drugs can have a significant impact on fibromyalgia-related pain; duloxetine and pregabalin have been demonstrated to reduce sleep disturbances and improve quality of life (the former also has been shown to improve mood), while milnacipran can offer significant benefits in reducing fatigue. A growing body of evidence suggests that the best treatment approach may involve the use of one or more agents whose mechanisms of action are aligned with patient-specific clusters of symptoms. Several other agents have been used for fibromyalgia, with mixed results, including tricyclic antidepressants, selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors, opioids, and gabapentin. Given the limitations of the evidence from clinical trials to date, controlled trials directly comparing different agents are needed to better delineate adverse-event risks, cost considerations, and optimal management approaches. CONCLUSION: A broad range of drugs has been used to treat fibromyalgia. Symptoms, comorbidities, adverse effects, and patient preference are important considerations in drug selection.


Subject(s)
Analgesics/therapeutic use , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Fibromyalgia/diagnosis , Fibromyalgia/drug therapy , Animals , Clinical Trials as Topic/methods , Cyclopropanes/therapeutic use , Duloxetine Hydrochloride , Fibromyalgia/physiopathology , Humans , Milnacipran , Pregabalin , Thiophenes/therapeutic use , gamma-Aminobutyric Acid/analogs & derivatives , gamma-Aminobutyric Acid/therapeutic use
3.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 63(2): 201-7, 2009 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19026510

ABSTRACT

The emergence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections has created a need for additional antimicrobial options. Patients at the Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN, who received alternative (nonvancomycin, nonlinezolid) therapy for MRSA infections from January 2004 to December 2005 were identified retrospectively, with sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim, clindamycin, tetracyclines, and fluoroquinolones assessed as alternative agents. Medical records were reviewed to determine therapeutic outcome and drug tolerance. During 2004 to 2005, 87 subjects received alternative therapy for MRSA infections. Infections included skin/musculoskeletal (n=74 [85%]) and urinary tract infections (n=13 [15%]). Thirty-five (40%) subjects received vancomycin initially, and then an alternative agent, whereas 52 (60%) received only alternative therapy. Treatment succeeded clinically in 77 (89%; 95% confidence interval, 78-96%) subjects. Adverse events were uncommon (6 subjects) and minor, necessitating a change of therapy in only 4 subjects. Alternative agents can be used successfully to treat non-life-threatening MRSA infections in appropriate patients. Randomized comparative trials are needed.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Staphylococcal Infections/drug therapy , Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Community-Acquired Infections/drug therapy , Doxycycline/administration & dosage , Doxycycline/adverse effects , Doxycycline/therapeutic use , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Minocycline/administration & dosage , Minocycline/adverse effects , Minocycline/therapeutic use , Multivariate Analysis , Regression Analysis , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination/administration & dosage , Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination/adverse effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...