Water Dissociates at the Aqueous Interface with Reduced Anatase TiO2 (101).

Elucidating the structure of the interface between natural (reduced) anatase TiO2 (101) and water is an essential step toward understanding the associated photoassisted water splitting mechanism. Here we present surface X-ray diffraction results for the room temperature interface with ultrathin and bulk water, which we explain by reference to density functional theory calculations. We find that both interfaces contain a 25:75 mixture of molecular H2O and terminal OH bound to titanium atoms along with bridging OH species in the contact layer. This is in complete contrast to the inert character of room temperature anatase TiO2 (101) in ultrahigh vacuum. A key difference between the ultrathin and bulk water interfaces is that in the latter water in the second layer is also ordered. These molecules are hydrogen bonded to the contact layer, modifying the bond angles.

Versailles Project on Advanced Materials and Standards Interlaboratory Study on Measuring the Thickness and Chemistry of Nanoparticle Coatings Using XPS and LEIS.

We report the results of a VAMAS (Versailles Project on Advanced Materials and Standards) inter-laboratory study on the measurement of the shell thickness and chemistry of nanoparticle coatings. Peptide-coated gold particles were supplied to laboratories in two forms: a colloidal suspension in pure water and; particles dried onto a silicon wafer. Participants prepared and analyzed these samples using either X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) or low energy ion scattering (LEIS). Careful data analysis revealed some significant sources of discrepancy, particularly for XPS. Degradation during transportation, storage or sample preparation resulted in a variability in thickness of 53 %. The calculation method chosen by XPS participants contributed a variability of 67 %. However, variability of 12 % was achieved for the samples deposited using a single method and by choosing photoelectron peaks that were not adversely affected by instrumental transmission effects. The study identified a need for more consistency in instrumental transmission functions and relative sensitivity factors, since this contributed a variability of 33 %. The results from the LEIS participants were more consistent, with variability of less than 10 % in thickness and this is mostly due to a common method of data analysis. The calculation was performed using a model developed for uniform, flat films and some participants employed a correction factor to account for the sample geometry, which appears warranted based upon a simulation of LEIS data from one of the participants and comparison to the XPS results.