Accuracy of frozen section remote subspecialty consultation using real-time telepathology and whole-slide imaging in gynecologic cases.

OBJECTIVES: Intrapathology consultation is recommended for complex cases during frozen section (FS) as routine practice. In our institution, solicited second opinions were traditionally provided by in-person consultation (IPC). Whole-slide imaging (WSI) was implemented in 2018 as an alternative but replaced by videoconferencing in 2020. Here, we assess the accuracy of remote FS consultation using these digital modalities vs IPC. METHODS: Gynecologic FS cases over a 4-year period overseen by 2 intraoperative consultants were grouped by consultation method: (1) IPC, (2) WSI, and (3) videoconferencing. Accuracy was determined by concordance between the FS and final report diagnoses. Turnaround time between the 3 groups was analyzed using SPSS statistical software (IBM). RESULTS: Using WSI and videoconferencing, 100% concordance was observed, while the IPC group had a 98.5% concordance rate. Videoconferencing, however, showed longer turnaround times (mean, 45.59 minutes) than IPC (mean, 33.36 minutes). Although turnaround time positively correlated with the number of FS specimens, blocks, and H&E slides per case, no statistically significant differences in the number of specimens, blocks, and H&E slides generated were found among the consultation methods. CONCLUSIONS: Even though turnaround time using videoconferencing is longer, the accuracy of WSI and videoconferencing for remote FS consultation is equivalent to IPC. It is therefore a safe method for conducting intrapathology FS consultation in challenging surgical cases.

Pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ovarian cancer and its association with outcome: A surrogate marker of survival.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to validate whether pathologic response (pR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) using a three-tier chemotherapy response score (CRS) is associated with clinical outcome in ovarian cancer (OC) and could be used as surrogate marker for survival. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of OC patients with FIGO stage III/IV disease who received NACT and graded response as no or minimal (CRS 1), partial (CRS 2), or complete/near-complete (CRS 3) pR using tissue specimens obtained from omentum. Uni- and multivariate survival analyses were performed accounting for age, FIGO stage, debulking and BRCA status as well as neoadjuvant use of bevacizumab. RESULTS: CRSs 1, 2 and 3 were found in 41(31%), 62 (47%) and 30 (22%) of the 133 examined cases. Response to NACT was associated with significantly improved progression-free (PFS, p < 0.001) and overall survival (OS, p = 0.011). Complete/ near-complete pathologic response (CRS3) was associated with improved PFS (median 24.8 vs. 12.5 months, unadjusted HR 0.28 [95%CI 0.15-0.54], p < 0.001; adjusted hazard ration (aHR) 0.31 [95% CI 0.14-0.72], p = 0.007) and OS (median 63.3 vs. 32.1 months, unadjusted HR 0.27 [95%CI 0.10-0.68], p = 0.006; aHR 0.32 [95% CI 0.09-1.11], p = 0.072) when compared to no or minimal response (CRS1). CONCLUSIONS: We validate a three-tier CRS for assessment of pathologic response to NACT in OC and demonstrate its prognostic independence of BRCA status or neoadjuvant bevacizumab use. Improving pR rates may be a useful goal of NACT in OC with the expectation of improved survival. The CRS may be a useful endpoint in clinical trials in OC.