Impact of consensus guidelines for breast-conserving surgery in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ.

BACKGROUND: Consensus guidelines published in 2016 recommended a 2 mm free margin as the standard for negative margins in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). The goal of the guideline recommendation was standardization of re-excision practices. AIMS: To evaluate the impact of this consensus guideline on our institutional practices. METHODS: We identified all patients at our institution with pure DCIS who were initially treated with BCS from September 2014 to August 2018 using a prospectively-maintained institutional database. A retrospective chart review was performed to determine margin status and re-excision rates during the 2 years before and the 2 years after the guideline was published in order to determine the effect on our re-excision rates. Close margins were defined as <2 mm. RESULTS: In the 2 years before the consensus guideline was published, 184 patients with DCIS underwent BCS. Twenty-six patients had positive margins and 24 underwent re-excision, including three who had completion mastectomy. Of the remaining 159 patients, 76 had ≥2 mm (negative) margins. The remaining 82 patients had close margins and 48 of these patients (58.5%) underwent re-excision, including one who had a completion mastectomy. Excluding the patients with positive margins, our re-excision rate was 30.4% prior to the guideline. In the 2 years after the consensus guideline was published, 192 patients with DCIS underwent initial BCS. Twenty-four patients had positive margins and 22 underwent re-excision, including three who had completion mastectomy. Of the remaining 168 patients, 95 patients had ≥2 mm (negative) margins. The remaining 73 patients had close margins and 45 of those patients (61.6%) underwent re-excision, including six who had completion mastectomy. Excluding the patients with positive margins, our re-excision rate was 26.8% after the guideline. CONCLUSIONS: Our institution's re-excision rate did not change significantly during the 2 years before and after the publication of the consensus guideline on adequate margins for patients undergoing BCT for DCIS. Our overall re-excision rate decreased slightly. However, of the patients who had close margins, a larger proportion underwent re-excision after the guideline was published. The guideline publication appears to have affected our institutional practices slightly, but not dramatically as many of our surgeons' practices were comparable to the guideline recommendations prior to 2016. We continue to use clinical judgment based on patient and tumor characteristics in deciding which patients will benefit from margin re-excision.

Presentation and surgical management of hidradenitis suppurativa of the breast during pregnancy: A case report.

INTRODUCTION: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the skin and soft tissues most commonly affecting the axilla and groin. It presents as recurrent inflamed lesions, abscesses, draining sinus tracts, and scars. Treatment focuses on preventing progression of disease and managing symptoms. There are limited guidelines discussing the treatment of HS during pregnancy as well as the surgical treatment of HS of the breast in young women who desire future lactation. PRESENTATION OF CASE: We present a case of a thirty-six-year-old female with HS of the breast during pregnancy. Her condition was recalcitrant to steroid injections, TNF blocker, antibiotics and incision and drainage. She developed numerous active, infected large interconnected lesions in her right breast. The decision was made to perform total excision of the infected area in the right breast. She underwent primary closure of the wound one week after excision and was able to successfully breast feed after this treatment. DISCUSSION: Treatment of HS includes both medical and surgical modalities and varies based on the severity of disease. In this patient, definitive but conservative pre-partum treatment was necessary to avoid milk fistula or chronic abscess formation, as the patient's desire was successful postpartum lactation. CONCLUSION: This report describes the successful surgical management of a pregnant woman with severe HS of the breast. This represents an alternative management method in an extreme case of HS, where aggressive medical management was contraindicated.

Primary small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the breast - A case report and review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: Primary small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the breast (SCNCB) is a very uncommon type of breast cancer. Histology and morphology are virtually indistinguishable from small cell neuroendocrine carcinomas of the lung (SCNCL), mandating a search for a primary site elsewhere in the body. There is no standard approach to treatment as there are only a limited number of cases reported in the literature. This report summarizes a case of primary SCNCB and presents a review of the literature. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 65-year-old female presented to her gynecologist with a right breast mass. After biopsy, she was diagnosed with a primary SCNCB with regional lymph node involvement. She was treated with chemotherapy and radiation therapy with a good clinical response. DISCUSSION: Due to the rare nature of this tumor, no standard treatment exits. Case reports have described breast conserving therapy combined with neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy as well as chemoradiation therapy alone for metastatic disease. Both chemotherapy regimens, those used to treat SCNCL and invasive breast cancer, have been described in these reports. CONCLUSION: Primary SCNCB is a very rare type of breast cancer with no standard treatment. Further research is needed to better understand the behavior of this rare tumor in order to develop a standard approach to treatment.

Similarities Between Large Animal-Related and Motor Vehicle Crash-Related Injuries.

OBJECTIVE: Many Americans sustain large animal-related injuries (LARIs) from blunt trauma. We compare the injuries and management of LARI in our region of the United States with those of motor vehicle crashes (MVCs). METHODS: A 15-year retrospective study of trauma patients with LARI matched to MVC controls by Injury Severity Score (ISS), age, and sex was conducted. Values were statistically compared, and differences were considered statistically significant at P < .05. RESULTS: There were 156 LARI cases, of which 87% were related to horses, 8% to bulls, and the remainder to deer, mules, bison, cows, and rams. In the LARI group, the age was 42±18 years (mean±SD), ISS was 7±4, and 61% were females. The MVC group had a significantly longer length of hospital stay (5±5 vs 4±3 days) and blood alcohol concentration (35±84 vs 3±20 g/L). There were no significant differences in injury patterns between LARI and MVC; however, additional radiological studies (RS) were performed on MVC (9±6 vs 7±5). LARI patients were more often transferred from rural locations (39% vs 25%) and traveled further to our trauma center (40±32 vs 24±29 km) than did MVC patients. CONCLUSIONS: LARI has a similar pattern of injury to MVC, but fewer RS. LARI typically occurred further away, requiring transfer from rural areas to our institution. We recommend a similar approach for the evaluation of LARI and MVC.