Short-Term Outcomes Following Cemented Versus Cementless Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Cemented fixation during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has long been the gold standard due to excellent survivorship and clinical outcomes. With recent biomaterial advancements, cementless fixation has gained renewed interest. Most studies demonstrate similar clinical outcomes and survivorship between these two fixation methods, without consensus regarding the optimal method of fixation during TKA. Outcomes following TKA also depend upon the proper alignment and positioning of components. Robotic-assisted TKA has been shown to improve outcomes related to component positioning, overall lower limb alignment, and soft tissue balancing. No study to date has investigated the role of robotic-assisted surgery on postoperative outcomes following cementless versus cemented TKA. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients 18 years of age and older who underwent primary robotic-assisted TKA performed by a single fellowship-trained arthroplasty surgeon. Oxford Knee Scores and Short Form Health Survey scores were obtained preoperatively and at a two-year follow-up. Complications such as DVT, infection, arthrofibrosis requiring manipulation, and revision surgery were collected. RESULTS: Three hundred eighty knees in the cementless cohort and 72 cemented knees were included for analysis. There were no statistically significant differences between the two cohorts in terms of SF-12, Oxford Knee Scores, complications, or revision surgery rates. CONCLUSION: Cementless fixation during TKA offers an alternative to cemented fixation with similar short-term results in terms of patient-reported outcomes, complication rates, and revision surgery rates. Further research is warranted to better understand long-term outcomes and survivorship following cementless versus cemented fixation during robotic-assisted TKA.

Cervical Myelopathy: An Update on Posterior Decompression.

STUDY DESIGN: This was a narrative review. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to discuss current methods and review updated outcome studies regarding posterior decompression in the management of cervical myelopathy. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Progressive myelopathy in the cervical segments is an indication for urgent surgical management. Although nonoperative treatment is an option in mild to moderate cases, the majority of patients will experience deterioration in neurological function requiring surgical decompression. METHODS: A review of the literature was performed using PubMed to provide updated information regarding posterior cervical decompression in the management of myelopathy. RESULTS: There are numerous studies comparing outcome data between cervical laminectomy and fusion with laminoplasty. While each technique has advantages and disadvantages, both provide adequate decompression and good long-term outcomes in patients meeting appropriate criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Posterior decompression is an important approach for spine surgeons to have in their toolkits when treating cervical myelopathy.

Metastatic prostate carcinoma: A rare presentation initially misdiagnosed as a rib fracture.

Metastatic prostate carcinoma mainly occurs in bone as an osteoblastic lesion or lesions in the pelvis, spine, or chest wall. We present a unique case of a singular metastatic osteolytic lesion in the rib initially misdiagnosed as a fracture in a 61-year-old male. A single rib fracture in a patient with no history of trauma should raise suspicion for metastatic disease. We would encourage prostate cancer to be included in the differential diagnosis for an osteolytic lesion in a male over the age of 40. We review the current literature on this rare presentation of bone metastasis as well as the pathogenesis of metastatic prostate carcinoma as it relates to a solitary metastatic osteolytic lesion.

Self-directed training with e-learning using the first-person perspective for laparoscopic suturing and knot tying: a randomised controlled trial : Learning from the surgeon's real perspective.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic suturing and knot tying is essential for advanced laparoscopic procedures and requires training outside of the operating room. However, personal instruction by experienced surgeons is limitedly available. To address this, the concept of combining e-learning with practical training has become of interest. This study aims to investigate the influence of the first-person perspective in instructional videos, as well as the feasibility of a completely self-directed training curriculum for laparoscopic suturing and knot tying. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-one laparoscopically naïve medical students were randomised into two groups training with e-learning videos in either the first-person perspective (combining endoscopic view and view of hands/instruments/forearm motion) or the endoscopic view only. Both groups trained laparoscopic suturing and knot tying in teams of two until reaching predefined proficiency levels. Blinded, trained raters regularly assessed the participants' performance by using validated checklists. After training, participants filled out questionnaires regarding training experience and personal characteristics. RESULTS: Average training time to reach proficiency did not differ between groups [first-person perspective (min): 112 ± 44; endoscopic view only (min): 109 ± 47; p = 0.746]. However, participants from both groups perceived the first-person perspective as useful for learning new laparoscopic skills. Both groups showed similar baseline performances and improved significantly after training [Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) (max. 37 points): first-person perspective: 30.3 ± 2.3; endoscopic view only: 30.8 ± 2.3]. All participants managed to reach proficiency, needing 8-43 attempts without differences between groups. Visuospatial abilities (mental rotation) seemed to enhance the learning curve. CONCLUSION: Modifying instructional videos to the first-person perspective did not translate into a better performance in this setting but was welcomed by participants. Completely self-directed training with the use of e-learning can be a feasible training approach to achieve technical proficiency in laparoscopic suturing and knot tying in a training setting.

Halsted's "See One, Do One, and Teach One" versus Peyton's Four-Step Approach: A Randomized Trial for Training of Laparoscopic Suturing and Knot Tying.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of Halsted's method "see one, do one, and teach one" with Peyton's Four-Step Approach for teaching intracorporal suturing and knot tying (ICKT). METHODS: Laparoscopically naïve medical students (n = 60) were randomized to teaching of ICKT with either Halsted's (n = 30) or Peyton's method (n = 30) for 60 minutes. Each student's first 3 and final sutures were evaluated using Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS), procedural implementation, knot quality, total time, and suture placement accuracy. RESULTS: Performance score and OSATS-PSC always differed significantly in favor of Peyton's group (p = 0.001). OSATS-GRS (p = 0.01) and task time (p = 0.03) differed only in the summary of the first 3 sutures in favor of Peyton's group. There were no significant intergroup differences in knot quality and accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: Peyton's Four-Step Approach is the preferable method for learning complex laparoscopic skills like ICKT.