Tumor-related immunity in prostate cancer patients treated with human recombinant granulocyte monocyte-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF).

BACKGROUND: Granulocyte monocyte-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) supports the survival, expansion, and differentiation of lymphoid and myeloid derived dendritic cells (DCs). We hypothesized that systemic therapy with GM-CSF in prostate cancer patients could augment prostate cancer-related immunity and induce clinical response. METHODS: Eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive either 125 or 250 microg/m(2) GM-CSF subcutaneously three times a week until clinical progression. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) T cell precursor frequencies were determined by a flow cytometric method. RESULTS: We were able to show, for the first time, a statistically significant correlation between pre-treatment PSA level and PSA-specific CD4(+) T cell precursors and a trend between pre-treatment PSA level and PSA-specific CD8(+) T cell precursors (P<0.0001 and P=0.059, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that existent immunity to PSA in prostate cancer patients may be a promising target for future immunotherapeutic approaches to prostate cancer.

Impaired cytolytic activity in peripheral blood T cells from renal cell carcinoma patients.

Classic T lymphocyte cytotoxicity is mediated through the T cell receptor (TCR). Defects in TCR signal transduction and cytolytic activity have been reported in tumor infiltrating T lymphocytes. We hypothesized that impaired cytotoxicity occurs in peripheral blood T cells from renal cell carcinoma (RCC) that can be reversed by exposure to rhIL-2. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from 29 RCC patients and 29 healthy volunteers were isolated and cultured in the absence or presence of 10 IU/ml rhIL-2. A redirected cytotoxicity assay that requires TCR signal transduction was used with chromium-labeled P815 target cells, effector PBMC and anti-CD3 antibody. Target cell lysis was measured in "lytic units" (LU). Mean LU from RCC patients was lower than that of healthy volunteers (105.8 LU vs. 194.6 LU, P = 0.025). Exposure to rhIL-2 increased T cell-mediated lysis in both groups. Disruption of T cell cytotoxicity in RCC patients can be overcome by exposure to rhIL-2.

Randomized phase III trial of high-dose interleukin-2 versus subcutaneous interleukin-2 and interferon in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: The Cytokine Working Group conducted a randomized phase III trial to determine the value of outpatient interleukin-2 (IL-2) and interferon alfa-2b (IFN) relative to high-dose (HD) IL-2 in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were stratified for bone and liver metastases, primary tumor in place, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 or 1 and then randomly assigned to receive either IL-2 (5 MIU/m(2) subcutaneously every 8 hours for three doses on day 1, then daily 5 days/wk for 4 weeks) and IFN (5 MIU/m(2) subcutaneously three times per week for 4 weeks) every 6 weeks or HD IL-2 (600,000 U/kg/dose intravenously every 8 hours on days 1 through 5 and 15 to 19 [maximum 28 doses]) every 12 weeks. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-two patients were enrolled between April 1997 and July 2000. Toxicities were as anticipated for these regimens. The response rate was 23.2% (22 of 95 patients) for HD IL-2 versus 9.9% (nine of 91 patients) for IL-2/IFN (P = .018). Ten patients receiving HD IL-2 were progression-free at 3 years versus three patients receiving IL-2 and IFN (P = .082). The median response durations were 24 and 15 [corrected] months (P = .18) [corrected] and median survivals were 17.5 and 13 months (P = .24). For patients with bone or liver metastases (P = .001) or a primary tumor in place (P = .040), survival was superior with HD IL-2. CONCLUSION: This randomized phase III trial provides additional evidence that HD IL-2 should remain the preferred therapy for selected patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Immunological effects of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and autologous tumor vaccine in patients with renal cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Biological therapy for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) uses agents that mobilize immune effector cells which are able to recognize and destroy cancer. We evaluated the effects of weekly then monthly autologous tumor vaccine combined with daily granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) in patients with RCC as a method of stimulating antigen presenting cells. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eligible patients with pathological stage II to IV RCC were entered into this pilot study. Autologous tumor vaccine (0.5 to 1 x 107 irradiated tumor cells) admixed with 250 microg GM-CSF per vaccine was given subcutaneously weekly for 4 weeks and then monthly for 4 months. GM-CSF (125 microg/m2) was given subcutaneously for 13 days after vaccine injection 1 and injections 4 to 8. Treatment related tumor specific CD4 and CD8 positive T cell precursors were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 22 patients were entered into this study. Patients were stratified by bulk of disease (group 1, 9 patients with micrometastatic disease, and group 2, 13 patients with macrometastatic disease). In general treatment was well tolerated. Of 9 patients in group 1 7 remained disease-free after nephrectomy. In group 2, 6 patients had stable (46.2%) and 7 patients had progressive disease (53.8%). Statistically significant treatment related increases in CD4 (p = 0.028) and CD8 (p = 0.018) positive tumor specific T cell precursors were observed for the entire group of patients. Changes in CD4 and CD8 positive precursors correlated significantly with each other (p = 0.0001). This correlation was seen in the 2 patient subpopulations as well (group 1 p = 0.003, group 2 p = 0.013). Patients with minimal disease, and with changes in CD4 and CD8 positive tumor specific T cell precursors greater than the median appeared to have an improved time to progression as well as a survival benefit. CONCLUSIONS: GM-CSF and autologous vaccine can be given safely in combination to patients with renal cell cancer. We observed treatment related changes in tumor specific circulating lymphocyte populations.

Adjuvant high-dose bolus interleukin-2 for patients with high-risk renal cell carcinoma: a cytokine working group randomized trial.

PURPOSE: This prospective, randomized, controlled phase III trial assessed high-dose bolus interleukin-2 (IL-2) postoperatively in patients with high-risk renal cell carcinoma (RCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligibility requirements were resected locally advanced (LA; T3b-4 or N1-3) or metastatic (M1) RCC, no prior systemic therapy, and excellent organ function. Randomized assignment was to one course of IL-2 (600,000 U/kg every 8 hours on days 1 to 5 and days 15 to 19 [maximum 28 doses]) or observation. The study was designed and powered to show an improvement in predicted 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) from 40% for the observation group to 70% for the treatment group. The accrual goal was 68 patients with LA disease, with 34 patients per treatment arm. Metastasectomy patients were to be analyzed separately because of their unpredictable natural history. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients were enrolled onto the study (44 LA and 25 M1 patients). Toxic effects of IL-2 were as anticipated; no unexpected serious adverse events or treatment-related deaths occurred. Early closure occurred when an interim analysis determined that the 30% improvement in 2-year DFS could not be achieved despite full accrual. Sixteen of 21 LA patients receiving IL-2 experienced relapse, compared with 15 of 23 patients in the observation arm (P =.73); in the LA group, three deaths occurred in the IL-2 arm, and five deaths occurred in the observation arm (P =.38). Analysis including metastasectomy patients made no difference in DFS or overall survival. CONCLUSION: One course of high-dose bolus IL-2, though feasible, did not produce the ambitious clinically meaningful benefit anticipated when administered postoperatively to patients with resected high-risk RCC.