Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
J Health Commun ; 14 Suppl 1: 95-108, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19449273

ABSTRACT

Concerns have been raised about the quality of life and health care received by cancer patients at the end of life (EOL). Many patients die with pain and other distressing symptoms inadequately controlled, receiving burdensome, aggressive care that worsens quality of life and limits patient exposure to palliative care, such as hospice. Patient-physician communication is likely a very important determinate of EOL care. Discussions of EOL with physicians are associated with an increased likelihood of the following (1) acknowledgment of terminal illness, (2) preferences for comfort care over life extension, and (3) receipt of less intensive, life-prolonging and more palliative EOL care; while this appears to hold for White patients, it is less clear for Black, advanced cancer patients. These results highlight the importance of communication in determining EOL cancer care and suggest that communication disparities may contribute to Black-White differences in EOL care. We review the pertinent literature and discuss areas for future research.


Subject(s)
Biomedical Research , Communication , Neoplasms , Palliative Care , Patient Education as Topic , Physician-Patient Relations , Black or African American , Health Status Disparities , Humans , Neoplasms/ethnology , Patient-Centered Care , Quality of Life , United States , White People
2.
Cancer ; 115(2): 399-409, 2009 Jan 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19110677

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Clinicians observe that advanced cancer patients with dependent children agonize over the impact their death will have on their children. The objective of this study was to determine empirically whether advanced cancer patients with and without dependent children differ in treatment preferences, mental health, and end-of-life (EOL) outcomes. METHODS: Coping with Cancer is a National Cancer Institute/National Institute of Mental Health-funded, multi-institutional, prospective cohort study of 668 patients with advanced cancer. Patients with and without dependent children were compared on rates of psychiatric disorders, advance care planning (ACP), EOL care, quality of their last week of life, and location of death. RESULTS: In adjusted analyses, patients with advanced cancer who had dependent children were more likely to meet panic disorder criteria (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 5.41; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 2.13-13.69), more likely to be worried (mean difference in standard deviations [delta], 0.09; P=.006), and more likely to prefer aggressive treatment over palliative care (AOR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.07-2.93). Patients with dependent children were less likely to engage in ACP (eg, do not resuscitate orders: AOR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.26-0.75) and had a worse quality of life in the last week of life (delta, 0.15; P=.007). Among spousal caregivers, those with dependent children were more likely to meet criteria for major depressive disorder (AOR, 4.53; 95% CI, 1.47-14) and generalized anxiety disorder (AOR, 3.95; 95% CI, 1.29-12.16). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with dependent children were more anxious, were less likely to engage in ACP, and were more likely to have a worse quality of life in their last week of life. Advanced cancer patients and spousal caregivers with dependent children represent a particularly distressed group that warrants further clinical attention, research, and support.


Subject(s)
Advance Care Planning , Child of Impaired Parents , Mental Health , Neoplasms/psychology , Patient Satisfaction , Quality of Life , Terminal Care , Adolescent , Anxiety Disorders/epidemiology , Caregivers , Child , Child, Preschool , Depression/epidemiology , Female , Home Care Services , Hospice Care , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/therapy , Spirituality , Terminally Ill
3.
Psychooncology ; 18(1): 50-61, 2009 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18523933

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the prevalence of mental disorders and related factors increase as advanced cancer patients get closer to death. METHOD: Baseline, cross-sectional data from 289 patients who were assessed prior to their death as part of a multi-site, longitudinal, prospective cohort study of advanced cancer patients. Major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder, and posttraumatic stress disorder were assessed using the Structured Clinical Interview for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV Axis I Disorders. Other factors examined included existential well-being, patient grief about their illness, physical symptom burden, terminal illness acknowledgment, peacefulness, and the wish to live or die. RESULTS: Closeness to death was not associated with higher rates of mental disorders. Patients closer to death exhibited increased existential distress and physical symptom burden, were more likely to acknowledge being terminally ill, and were more likely to report an increased wish to die. CONCLUSION: Results do not provide support for the common clinical assumption that the prevalence of depressive and anxiety disorders increases as death nears. However, patients' level of physical distress, acknowledgment of terminal illness, and wish to die, possibly reflecting acceptance of dying, increased as death approached. Longitudinal studies are needed to confirm individual changes in rates of mental disorder as patients approach death.


Subject(s)
Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Neoplasms/psychology , Stress, Psychological/epidemiology , Terminally Ill/psychology , Adult , Attitude to Death , Connecticut/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Grief , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , New York/epidemiology , Prevalence , Texas/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...