Response of soil and vegetation in a warm-temperate Pine forest to intensive biomass harvests, phosphorus fertilisation, and wood ash application.

The objective of this study was to assess the effects of different intensities of biomass harvesting, and the possible effects of compensation methods, on forest functioning. To do so, we carried out a split-plot experiment (SW France) crossing four different intensities of biomass harvesting (Stem-Only Harvest [SOH], Aboveground Additional Harvest [AAH], Belowground Additional Harvest [BAH], and Whole-Tree Harvest [WTH]) and three compensation methods (control [C], wood ash application [A] and phosphorus fertilisation [P]). The experimental treatments were followed by the plantation of pines (Pinus pinaster). The environmental consequences of treatments on soil and vegetation were evaluated 11 years after the tree plantation. Despite their low additional biomass exports (+10 % for AAH to +34 % for WTH), the non-conventional harvest practices exported much higher quantities of nutrients than the conventional SOH technique (+145 % of exported N in WTH). Additional biomass harvests impacted the soil organic matter content, with negative effects on P-organic, soil cation exchange capacity, exchangeable Ca, and most extractible nutrients. However, tree nutritional status was improved by P-fertiliser or wood ash. We observed a positive effect of wood ash application on soil pH and nutrient content but, like additional harvests, wood ash application decreased the pool of soil organic carbon (~10 %). Overall, the experiment showed that exporting more forest biomass due to the additional harvesting of biomass had negative consequences on the ecosystem biogeochemistry. Additional harvests have impoverished the soil, and decreased the soil organic carbon content. Importantly, applying nutrients as fertiliser or wood ash did not compensate for all the negative impacts of biomass exports and the method of wood ash recycling in forests could even decrease the soil organic carbon.

Using a dune forest as a filtering ecosystem for water produced by a treatment plant - One decade of environmental assessment.

A dune forest in SW France composed of maritime pines was irrigated with treated wastewater for a decade in an experiment (including irrigated plots versus control plots) to evaluate the environmental impact of applying wastewater on the water table, soil properties, and plants. The amount of treated wastewater (1921 mm yr-1) applied was twice the annual precipitation. Nutrient inputs were also very high, particularly nitrogen (N: 539 kg-N ha-1 yr-1), phosphorus (P: 102 kg-P ha-1 yr-1), and calcium (Ca: 577 kg-Ca ha-1 yr-1). Irrigation caused a rise in the water table, and increased its sodium (Na), NO3-, potassium (K), and calcium concentrations. Soil properties were affected by irrigation at least down to a depth of 1.2 m. After eight years of irrigation, soil pH had increased by 1.4 units, and soil available P content (POlsen) increased nearly 8-fold. In the short-term (i.e. 1-3 years), irrigation with treated wastewater improved growth, standing biomass, and the nutritional status of the vegetation. But tree dieback started in the fourth year of irrigation and worsened until the end of the monitoring period when almost all the irrigated trees were dead or moribund. The understory composition was drastically modified by irrigation, with an increase in α-biodiversity and in the biomass of herbaceous species, and a reduction in woody species abundance. The factor that best explained tree dieback was manganese nutrition (Mn): (i) the Mn content of the tree foliage was negatively affected by irrigation and below the deficiency values reported for pine species, and (ii) soil available Mn (CaCl2 extraction) decreased by half in the topsoil layer. Manganese deficiency was probably the consequence of the increase in soil pH, which in turn reduced soil Mn availability. Tree dieback was not related to either to a macronutrient deficiency or to toxicity caused by a trace element.