ABSTRACT
Amniotic fluid embolism (AFE) is an obstetric complication that can result in acute circulatory failure during and after labor. The effectiveness of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in AFE patients has not been established, especially in the context of coagulopathy. This review aims to evaluate the efficacy of ECMO support in AFE patients. We conducted a systematic review of case reports following the Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Quality assessment was performed using a standardized tool. Out of 141 studies screened, 33 studies included 79 AFE patients. The median age was 34 years, and the median gestational age was 37.5 weeks. The majority of AFE cases occurred during cesarean section delivery (55.2%), followed by labor before fetal delivery (26.7%). Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation configurations included venoarterial ECMO (81.3%) and extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR, 10.7%). The maternal survival rate was 72%, with 21.2% experiencing minor neurological sequelae and 5.8% having major neurological sequelae. Rescue ECMO to support circulation has demonstrated both safety and efficacy in managing AFE. We suggest early activation of local or mobile ECMO as soon as an AFE diagnosis is established. Further studies are needed to assess the benefits and implications of early ECMO support in AFE patients.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Hemostatic dysfunction during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) due to blood-circuit interaction and the consequences of shear stress imposed by flow rates lead to rapid coagulation cascade and thrombus formation in the ECMO system and blood vessels. We aimed to identify the incidence and risk factors for cannula-associated arterial thrombosis (CaAT) post-decannulation. METHODS: A retrospective study of patients undergoing arterial cannula removal following ECMO was performed. We evaluated the incidence of CaAT and compared the characteristics, ECMO machine parameters, cannula sizes, number of blood products transfused during ECMO, and daily hemostasis parameters in patients with and without CaAT. Multivariate analysis identified the risk factors for CaAT. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients requiring venoarterial ECMO (VA-ECMO) or hybrid methods were recruited for thrombosis screening. The median Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score was 11 (interquartile range, 8-13). CaAT occurred in 29 patients (61.7%), with thrombosis in the superficial femoral artery accounting for 51.7% of cases. The rate of limb ischemia complications in the CaAT group was 17.2%. Multivariate analysis determined that the ECMO flow rate-body surface area (BSA) ratio (100 ml/min/m2) was an independent factor for CaAT, with an odds ratio of 0.79 (95% confidence interval, 0.66-0.95; P=0.014). CONCLUSIONS: We found that the incidence of CaAT was 61.7% following successful decannulation from VA-ECMO or hybrid modes, and the ECMO flow rate-BSA ratio was an independent risk factor for CaAT. We suggest screening for arterial thrombosis following VA-ECMO, and further research is needed to determine the risks and benefits of such screening.
