Treatment of neurosarcoidosis--innovations and challenges.

INTRODUCTION: Sarcoidosis affects the central nervous system more frequently than it used to be believed. While the cranial nerves are most frequently affected, neurosarcoidosis can involve other nervous system tissues as well. TREATMENT OF NEUROSARCOIDOSIS: Although a lot of drugs have proved useful in treating neurosarcoidosis, corticosteroids are still the gold standard in treatment of these patients. Therapeutic protocols differ regarding the dose of these drugs. Symptomatic neurosarcoidosis should always be treated with pulse corticosteroid therapy. People with diabetes, high blood pressure, osteoporosis and tuberculosis should be carefully monitored, as they are prone to complications associated with treatment with corticosteroids. In cases when treatment with corticosteroids does not show the desired results or therapy is discontinued due to the development of side effects, there are other pharmacologic options, such as methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil, cyclophosphamide, chloroquine, azathioprine, thalidomide, and infliximab. It should be noted that the treatment response to the above mentioned regimens, except for infliximab, is relatively slow compared to corticosteroids; therefore, corticosteroids should be taken into account in all states and particularly in the acute phase of the disease. CONCLUSION: It is the existence of different forms of the disease, lack of local diagnostic criteria and different and non standardized therapy that makes the treatment of this disease difficult. Despite advances in pharmacotherapy and radiological diagnosis, it is necessary to develop better diagnostic strategies in order to set the optimal therapeutic approach.

Diagnosis of neurosarcoidosis--necessity of biopsy.

INTRODUCTION: Sarcoidosis can affect any part of the central nervous system presenting with an extremely diverse clinical picture. Clinical presentations actually depend on the localization ofgranulomas in the central nervous system. Making diagnosis according to the localization and the clinical variations is often a clinical challenge. DIAGNOSIS OF NEUROSARCOIDOSIS: Diagnosis is based on the clinical picture, clinical and radiological findings (magnetic resonance imaging with contrast endocranium), laboratory findings (angio-tenzin-converting enzyme and chitotriosidase in cerebrospinal fluid); however, it is necessary first to exclude all other possible causes of granulomatous inflammation. Recent studies in patients with neurosarcoidosis show a high value of at least one marker of the disease. The safest way and the gold standard in diagnosing this disease would be histopathological confirmation, which is rarely performed due to its invasiveness. CONCLUSION: New diagnostic methods will contribute to better methods of bypassing invasive procedures, and they will significantly facilitate the diagnosis of neurosarcoidosis, which is a real challenge even for experienced clinicians who deal with this disease.

Radiological presentation of neurosarcoidosis.

INTRODUCTION: In diagnostics of neurosarcoidosis, radiological diagnostic procedures are available, non-invasive and they contribute significantly to the diagnosis of this disease. The aim of this paper is to present a brief overview of the radiological diagnostic methods, their application, and their importance in daily clinical work with these patients. RADIOLOGICAL PRESENTATION OF NEUROSARCOIDOSIS: Magnetic resonance is the method of choice in diagnostics of this disease. Computed tomography can also be helpful in patients with contraindications for magnetic resonance, although it is less precise in assessing the involvement of the periventricular white matter, hypothalamus, and cranial nerves. The number of lesions and the degree of involvement of the parenchyma and leptomeninges are better seen by magnetic resonance than by computed tomography scan. It is important to note that the magnetic resonance imaging may be normal in patients with neurosarcoidosis, especially in patients with cranial neuropathy, or in patients treated with corticosteroids. There is a number of variability in the occurrence of neurosarcoidosis on radiological images. CONCLUSION: Radiological procedures are on the very top of diagnostic pyramid of this disease due to their availability, non-invasiveness, and precision.

The first outbreak of brucellosis in the region of Sabac.

BACKGROUND/AIM: In Serbia brucellosis is a primary disease of the animals in the southern parts of the country. The aim of this study was to describe the first outbreak of human and animal brucellosis in the region of Sabac, Serbia. METHODS: An epidemiological investigation was conducted to identify a source of outbreak and the ways of transmission of brucellosis infection in human population. A descriptive and analytical epidemiological methods (cohort study) were used. Additional data included monthly reports of the infectious diseases from the Institutes of Public Health and data from the Veterinary Specialistic Institute in Sabac. The serological tests for human brucellosis cases were performed in the Laboratory of the Military Medical Academy; laboratory confirmation of animal brucellosis cases was obtained from the reference laboratory of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Belgrade. RESULTS: Twelve cases of brucellosis were recorded from February 9 to September 1, 2004. Total attack rate was 8.1% (7.5% of males, 14.2% of females). Relative risk (RR) of milk consumption was 8.9 (95% confidence interval: 1.63-13.38), and RR for direct contact with animals was 14 (95% confidence interval: 3.5-55.6). The prevalence of seropositive animals in 33 villages of the Macva region accounted for 0.8%. Regarding animal species, sheep were predominant--264 (95.7%). Out of a total number of seropositive animals, ELISA results were positive in 228 (88.7%) of them. CONCLUSION: As contact epidemics generally last longer, it is probable that the implemented measures of outbreak control did reduce the length of their duration.

[Association between tobacco smoking and pulmonary tuberculosis].

BACKGROUND/AIM: Numerous studies evaluate the influence of tobacco smoking on the tuberculosis (TB) development, with the results indicating that smoking can be also considered as important risk factor in TB. The aim of this study was to assess the influence of tobacco smoking as the risk factor in the development of TB as well as in its clinical course. METHODS: We analyzed data from the medical records of 192 consecutively hospitalized TB patients (124 males and 68 females) in the Institute of Pulmonary Diseases and Tuberculosis, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade in the period from 2005 to 2007. RESULTS: Among the analyzed TB patients there were more smokers (63.5%) than nonsmokers (36.5%). The majority of the smokers (73.8%) belonged to a middle age group (35-54 years) while the majority of nonsmokers (64.3%) were older than 55 years. Sex ratio among the smokers showed the domination of males (80.3%). There were significantly more males in the smoking group and more females in the nonsmoking group (chi2 = 34.402, p < 0.0001). Most smokers (68.9%) smoked more than 20 cigarettes daily. The average index of pack/years among all of the examinated patients was 32.75 +/- 18.26. Cavitary pulmonary lesions were more frequently verified in the smokers (64.2%) than in the nonsmokers (35.8%). The sputum acid-fast bacillus smear-positive finding was more frequent in the smokers (78%) than in the nonsmokers (22%). The nonsmoking TB patients had more accompanied immunodeficient diseases (34%) than the smoking ones (19%). Body-mass index was lower in the smokers (21.75) than in the nonsmokers (23.80), although this difference did not reach the statistical significance. CONCLUSION: There are more smokers than nonsmokers in TB patients. Smokers more frequently have cavitary forms of TB with sputum acid-fast bacillus smear--positive finding than nonsmokers.