ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT) is indicated in case of clinically relevant exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI). Clinical trials addressing PERT have used the coefficient of fat absorption (CFA) to define EPI but this test is cumbersome to perform. Our aim was to compare two easier-to-perform tests to detect clinically relevant EPI: Fecal Elastase-1 (FE-1) and 13C-Mixed Triglyceride Breath Test (TGBT). METHODS: We prospectively included 54 patients with chronic pancreatitis (CP), 24.1% operated, 29.6% had EPI. EPI was defined as a CFA <93%. The sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values for different cut-offs of FE-1 and TGBT were calculated. RESULTS: The area under the ROC curve for FE-1/TGBT was 0.861/0.876 for the global sample, 0.842/0.794 for non-operated patients and 0.917/1 for operated patients respectively. Se, Sp, PPV and NPV for a cut-off of FE-1 <200 µg/g were 93.8%, 63.2%, 51.7% and 96% respectively. The best cut-off point for FE-1 was 84 µg/g, which yielded an 87.5% Se, 81.6% Sp, 66.7% PPV and 93.9% NPV. The same parameters for a TGBT <29% were 81.3%, 84.2%, 68.4% and 91.4% respectively. The best cut-off point for TGBT was <23%, which yielded an 81.3% Se, 94.7% Sp, 86.7% PPV and 92.3% NPV. Diabetes was associated to decreased FE-1 levels, even in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: FE-1 and TGBT showed similar results for the diagnosis of EPI in CP. In non-operated CP patients, TGBT does not offer any advantage to FE-1 but in operated CP patients TGBT seems a more accurate test.
ABSTRACT
AIM: To assess the usefulness of urinary trypsinogen-2 test strip, urinary trypsinogen activation peptide (TAP), and serum and urine concentrations of the activation peptide of carboxypeptidase B (CAPAP) in the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis. METHODS: Patients with acute abdominal pain and hospitalized within 24 h after the onset of symptoms were prospectively studied. Urinary trypsinogen-2 was considered positive when a clear blue line was observed (detection limit 50 microg/L). Urinary TAP was measured using a quantitative solid-phase ELISA, and serum and urinary CAPAP by a radioimmunoassay method. RESULTS: Acute abdominal pain was due to acute pancreatitis in 50 patients and turned out to be extrapancreatic in origin in 22 patients. Patients with acute pancreatitis showed significantly higher median levels of serum and urinary CAPAP levels, as well as amylase and lipase than extrapancreatic controls. Median TAP levels were similar in both groups. The urinary trypsinogen-2 test strip was positive in 68% of patients with acute pancreatitis and 13.6% in extrapancreatic controls (P<0.01). Urinary CAPAP was the most reliable test for the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis (sensitivity 66.7%, specificity 95.5%, positive and negative predictive values 96.6% and 56.7%, respectively), with a 14.6 positive likelihood ratio for a cut-off value of 2.32 nmol/L. CONCLUSION: In patients with acute abdominal pain, hospitalized within 24 h of symptom onset, CAPAP in serum and urine was a reliable diagnostic marker of acute pancreatitis. Urinary trypsinogen-2 test strip showed a clinical value similar to amylase and lipase. Urinary TAP was not a useful screening test for the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis.
