Impact of Angiogenic and Cardiovascular Biomarkers for Prediction of Placental Dysfunction in the First Trimester of Pregnancy.

Algorithms for first-trimester prediction of pre-eclampsia usually include maternal risk factors, blood pressure, placental growth factor (PlGF), and uterine artery Doppler pulsatility index. However, these models lack sensitivity for the prediction of late-onset pre-eclampsia and other placental complications of pregnancy, such as small for gestational age infants or preterm birth. The aim of this study was to assess the screening performance of PlGF, soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt-1), N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), uric acid, and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-TnT) in the prediction of adverse obstetric outcomes related to placental insufficiency. This retrospective case-control study was based on a cohort of 1390 pregnant women, among which 210 presented pre-eclampsia, small for gestational age infants, or preterm birth. Two hundred and eight women with healthy pregnancies were selected as controls. Serum samples were collected between weeks 9 and 13 of gestation, and maternal serum concentrations of PlGF, sFlt-1, NT-proBNP, uric acid, and hs-TnT were measured. Multivariate regression analysis was used to generate predictive models combining maternal factors with the above-mentioned biomarkers. Women with placental dysfunction had lower median concentrations of PlGF (25.77 vs. 32.00 pg/mL; p < 0.001), sFlt-1 (1212.0 vs. 1363.5 pg/mL; p = 0.001), and NT-proBNP (51.22 vs. 68.71 ng/L; p < 0.001) and higher levels of uric acid (193.66 µmol/L vs. 177.40 µmol/L; p = 0.001). There was no significant difference between groups regarding the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio. Hs-TnT was not detected in 70% of the maternal serums analyzed. Altered biomarker concentrations increased the risk of the analyzed complications both in univariate and multivariate analyses. The addition of PlGF, sFlt-1, and NT-proBNP to maternal variables improved the prediction of pre-eclampsia, small for gestational age infants, and preterm birth (area under the curve: 0.710, 0.697, 0.727, and 0.697 vs. 0.668, respectively). Reclassification improvement was greater in maternal factors plus the PlGF model and maternal factors plus the NT-p roBNP model (net reclassification index, NRI: 42.2% and 53.5%, respectively). PlGF, sFlt-1, NT-proBNP, and uric acid measurements in the first trimester of pregnancy, combined with maternal factors, can improve the prediction of adverse perinatal outcomes related to placental dysfunction. In addition to PlGF, uric acid and NT-proBNP are two promising predictive biomarkers for placental dysfunction in the first trimester of pregnancy.

Gestational Age-Adjusted Reference Ranges for Fetal Left Ventricle Longitudinal Strain by Automated Cardiac Motion Quantification between 24 and 37 Weeks' Gestation.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to construct gestational age (GA) based reference values for left ventricle (LV) longitudinal strain in normal fetuses, between 24 and 37 weeks' gestation, assessing its feasibility and reproducibility with automated cardiac motion quantification software (aCMQ-QLab), which is widely used in postnatal echocardiography. METHODS: This prospective study included healthy gravid women with singleton pregnancies and no evidence of fetal structural cardiovascular disease. Fetal echocardiographies were performed between 24 and 37 GA. 2D four-chamber view clips were recorded and LV longitudinal strain was analyzed offline. Intra- and interobserver reproducibility between 2 independent observers was evaluated by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland-Altman scatterplots. Regression analysis was used to determine GA adjusted reference ranges and construct nomograms. RESULTS: LV longitudinal strain measurements were feasible in 95.4% of acquisitions. 435 clips were obtained. Intra- and interobserver ICC were 0.998 (95% CI 0.997-0.999) and 0.991 (95% CI 0.984-0.995), respectively. The global longitudinal strain and the middle and apical LV segments showed progressive decline as GA advanced, whereas the basal segments remained stable. CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of LV longitudinal strain by aCMQ-QLab is feasible, reproducible, and within normal ranges. Our results offer more information regarding fetal cardiac function assessment with 2D speckle tracking techniques, aiding in the introduction of this software into research practice, encouraging the realization of more studies, and probably helping in its future use in clinical practice, allowing longitudinal surveillance of strain without intervendor variability and aiding in follow-up of fetal cardiac conditions before and after birth, as it is the most commonly used software postnatally.

First-Trimester Sequential Screening for Preeclampsia Using Angiogenic Factors: Study Protocol for a Prospective, Multicenter, Real Clinical Setting Study.

Introduction: The incidence of preeclampsia (PE) is about 2-8%, making it one of the leading causes of perinatal morbidity and maternal mortality in the world. Early prophylactic low dose administration (150 mg) of acetylsalicylic acid is associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of early-onset PE, intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), and neonatal mean stay in the intensive care unit (ICU). Universal implementation of a first-trimester screening system including angiogenic and antiangiogenic markers [the Placental Growth Factor (PlGF) and/or soluble fms-like Tyrosine Kinase-1 (sFlt-1)] has shown a prediction rate of 90% for early-onset PE but entails a high financial cost. The aim of this study is to determine the predictive and preventive capacity of a universal PE first-trimester two-step sequential screening model, determining the PlGF only in patients previously classified as intermediate risk by means of a multivariate model based on resources already used in the standard pregnancy control, in a real clinical setting. We hypothesize that this screening model will achieve similar diagnostic performance as the universal determination of PlGF but at a lower economic cost. Methods and Analysis: This is a prospective, multicentric, cohort study in a real-world clinical setting. Every singleton pregnancy will be recruited at the routine first pregnancy visit. In a first step, the first-trimester risk of PE will be calculated using a multivariate Gaussian distribution model, based on medical history, mean blood pressure, Pregnancy-Associated Plasma Protein A (PAPP-A), and Uterine Artery Doppler Pulsatility Index (UTPI). Patients will be classified into three risk groups for PE: (1) risk ≥ 1/50, high-risk with no further testing (blinded PlGF); (2) risk between 1/51 and 1/500, medium-risk requiring further testing; and (3) risk ≤ 1/501, low-risk with no further testing. In a second step, the PlGF will only be determined in those patients classified as intermediate risk after this first step, and then reclassified into high- or low-risk groups. Prophylactic administration of aspirin (150 mg/day) will be prescribed only in high risk patients. As a secondary objective, sFlt-1 values will be blindly determined in patients with high and intermediate risk to assess its potential performance in the screening for PE. Ethics and Dissemination: The study will be conducted in accordance with the principles of Good Clinical Practice. This study is approved by the Aragon Research Ethics Committee (CEICA) on 3 July 2020 (15/2020). Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT04767438.

Reduction in Preterm Preeclampsia after Contingent First-Trimester Screening and Aspirin Prophylaxis in a Routine Care Setting.

Objectives: Several multivariate algorithms for preeclampsia (PE) screening in the first trimester have been developed over the past few years. These models include maternal factors, mean arterial pressure (MAP), uterine artery Doppler (UtA-PI), and biochemical markers (pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) or placental growth factor (PlGF)). Treatment with low-dose aspirin (LDA) has shown a reduction in the incidence of preterm PE in women with a high-risk assessment in the first trimester. An important barrier to the implementation of first-trimester screening is the cost of performing tests for biochemical markers in the whole population. Theoretical contingent strategies suggest that two-stage screening models could also achieve high detection rates for preterm PE with lower costs. However, no data derived from routine care settings are currently available. This study was conducted to validate and assess the performance of a first-trimester contingent screening process using PlGF for PE, with prophylactic LDA, for decreasing the incidence of preterm PE. Methods: This was a two-phase study. In phase one, a contingent screening model for PE was developed using a multivariate validated model and a historical cohort participating in a non-interventional PE screening study (n = 525). First-stage risk assessment included maternal factors, MAP, UtA-PI, and PAPP-A. Several cut-off levels were tested to determine the best screening performance, and three groups were then defined (high-, medium-, and low-risk groups). PlGF was determined in the medium-risk group to calculate the final risk. Phase two included a validation cohort of 847 singleton pregnancies prospectively undergoing first-trimester PE screening using this approach. Women at high risk of PE received prophylactic treatment with 150 mg of LDA. The clinical impact of the model was evaluated by comparing the incidence of early-onset (<34 weeks) and preterm (<37 weeks) PE between groups. Results: Cut-off levels for the contingent screening model were chosen in the first and second stages of screening to achieve a performance with sensitivities of 100% and 80% for early-onset and preterm PE detection, respectively, with a 15% false positive rate. In the development phase, 21.5% (n = 113) of the women had a medium risk of PE and required second-stage screening. In the prospective validation phase, 15.3% (n = 130) of the women required second-stage screening for PlGF, yielding an overall screen-positive rate of 14.9% (n = 126). The incidence of preterm PE was reduced by 68.4% (1.9% vs. 0.6%, p = 0.031) after one year of screening implementation. Conclusions: Implementation of contingent screening for PE using PlGF in a routine care setting led to a significant reduction (68.4%) in preterm PE, suggesting that contingent screening can achieve similar results to protocols using PlGF in the whole population. This could have financial benefits, with a similar reduction in the rate of preterm PE.

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Maternal Well-Being during Pregnancy.

The outbreak of a pandemic has negative psychological effects. We aimed to determine the impact of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic during pregnancy and identify the risk factors for maternal well-being. A multicenter, prospective, population-based study was carried out that included women (n = 1320) who were pregnant during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in Barcelona (Spain) compared against a pre-pandemic cohort (n = 345). Maternal well-being was assessed using the validated World Health Organization Well-Being Index Questionnaire (WHO-5 Index). Pregnant women attended during the COVID-19 pandemic showed worst WHO-5 well-being scores (median (IQR) of 56 (36−72) for the pandemic cohort vs. 64 (52−76) for the pre-pandemic cohort p < 0.001), with 42.8% of women presenting a poor well-being score vs. 28% for the pre-pandemic cohort (p < 0.001). Presence of a previous psychiatric disorder (OR 7.1; 95% CI 2.6−19, p < 0.001), being in the third trimester of pregnancy (OR 1.7; 95% CI 1.5−2, p < 0.001), or requiring hospital admission for COVID-19 (OR 4.7; 95% CI 1.4−16.7, p = 0.014), significantly contributed to low maternal well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic (multivariate analysis). Being infected by SARS-CoV-2 was not associated with a lower well-being score. We conclude that, during the COVID-19 pandemic, there were higher rates of poor maternal well-being; the infection of SARS-CoV-2 itself did not worsen maternal well-being, but other factors as psychiatric disorders, being in the third trimester of pregnancy or hospital admission for COVID-19 disease did.

First-Trimester SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Clinical Presentation, Inflammatory Markers, and Obstetric Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Second- and third-trimester SARS-CoV-2 infections may have an increased risk of obstetric complications. However, data on first-trimester infections are scarce. We sought to characterize the clinical and inflammatory presentations and pregnancy outcomes of first-trimester infections. METHODS: A population-based multicenter study including 817 singleton pregnancies with SARS-CoV-2 serologic testing at 8-14 weeks between March and May 2020. Blood count, uterine artery Doppler, and pregnancy-associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A) were performed in all women. Placental growth factor (PlGF), soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt-1), IL-6, and ferritin were determined in positive women. Obstetric outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: The prevalence of first-trimester infection was 15.2% (n = 124). 72.6% of positive women were asymptomatic. Symptomatic women had higher rates of lymphopenia (1.91 × 109/L vs. 2.16 × 109/L, p = 0.017) and increased levels of IL-6 (9.1% vs. 1.2%, p = 0.051), but lower rates of decreased ferritin (6.3% vs. 19.8%, p = 0.015). PAPP-A was higher in symptomatic women compared with asymptomatic and negative women (1.44 [IQR 0.90-1.82] vs. 1.08 [IQR 0.66-1.61] p = 0.014, vs. 1.08 [IQR 0.77-1.55] p = 0.019, respectively). Obstetric outcomes were not increased. CONCLUSIONS: First-trimester SARS-CoV-2 infections are mostly asymptomatic, with a mild increase of inflammatory markers in symptomatic women. Obstetric complications were not increased, but PAPP-A levels were higher in symptomatic women.

Cardiac dysfunction and remodeling regulated by anti-angiogenic environment in patients with preeclampsia: the ANGIOCOR prospective cohort study protocol.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are cause of increased morbidity and mortality in spite of advances for diagnosis and treatment. Changes during pregnancy affect importantly the maternal CV system. Pregnant women that develop preeclampsia (PE) have higher risk (up to 4 times) of clinical CVD in the short- and long-term. Predominance of an anti-angiogenic environment during pregnancy is known as main cause of PE, but its relationship with CV complications is still under research. We hypothesize that angiogenic factors are associated to maternal cardiac dysfunction/remodeling and that these may be detected by new cardiac biomarkers and maternal echocardiography. METHODS: Prospective cohort study of pregnant women with high-risk of PE in first trimester screening, established diagnosis of PE during gestation, and healthy pregnant women (total intended sample size n = 440). Placental biochemical and biophysical cardiovascular markers will be assessed in the first and third trimesters of pregnancy, along with maternal echocardiographic parameters. Fetal cardiac function at third trimester of pregnancy will be also evaluated and correlated with maternal variables. Maternal cardiac function assessment will be determined 12 months after delivery, and correlation with CV and PE risk variables obtained during pregnancy will be evaluated. DISCUSSION: The study will contribute to characterize the relationship between anti-angiogenic environment and maternal CV dysfunction/remodeling, during and after pregnancy, as well as its impact on future CVD risk in patients with PE. The ultimate goal is to improve CV health of women with high-risk or previous PE, and thus, reduce the burden of the disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04162236.

Impact of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Infection on Pregnancy Outcomes: A Population-based Study.

BACKGROUND: We performed a population-based study to describe the impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection on pregnancy outcomes. METHODS: This prospective, population-based study included pregnant women who consecutively presented at first/second trimester visits or at delivery at 3 hospitals in Barcelona, Spain. SARS-CoV-2 antibodies (immunoglobulin [Ig] G and IgM/IgA) were measured in all participants, and nasopharyngeal real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was performed at delivery. The primary outcome was a composite of pregnancy complications in SARS-CoV-2-positive vs negative women that included miscarriage, preeclampsia, preterm delivery, perinatal death, small-for-gestational-age newborn, or neonatal admission. Secondary outcomes were components of the primary outcome plus abnormal fetal growth, malformation, or intrapartum fetal distress. Outcomes were also compared between positive symptomatic and positive asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 women. RESULTS: Of 2225 pregnant women, 317 (14.2%) were positive for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies (n = 314, 99.1%) and/or RT-PCR (n = 36, 11.4%). Among positive women, 217 (68.5%) were asymptomatic, 93 (29.3%) had mild coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), and 7 (2.2%) had pneumonia, of whom 3 required intensive care unit admission. In women with and without SARS-CoV-2 infection, the primary outcome occurred in 43 (13.6%) and 268 (14%), respectively (risk difference, -0.4%; 95% confidence interval, -4.1% to 4.1). Compared with noninfected women, those with symptomatic COVID-19 had increased rates of preterm delivery (7.2% vs 16.9%, P = .003) and intrapartum fetal distress (9.1% vs 19.2%, P = .004), while asymptomatic women had rates that were similar to those of noninfected cases. Among 143 fetuses from infected mothers, none had anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgA in cord blood. CONCLUSIONS: The overall rate of pregnancy complications in women with SARS-CoV-2 infection was similar to that of noninfected women. However, symptomatic COVID-19 was associated with modest increases in preterm delivery and intrapartum fetal distress.

Inter- and Intraobserver Agreement in First Trimester Ultrasound Evaluation of Placental Biometry.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the clinical applicability of a new analytical software program by determining the inter- and intraobserver agreement for 2D placental biometry and three-dimensional (3D) placental volume (PV) in the first trimester. METHODS: A prospective study of 25 singleton pregnancies between 11 and 14 weeks was conducted. 3D datasets were captured, and PV was estimated using the Phillips QLAB GI3DQ ultrasound quantification software. The basal plate (BP), chorionic plate (CP), placental thickness (PT), and the free uterine surface (FUS) area not occupied by placenta were considered for 2D biometry evaluation. Each variable was measured in 2 orthogonal planes with mean values used for the analysis. Intra- and interobserver agreement was evaluated. RESULTS: Intraobserver agreement for both 2D and 3D measurements was high, particularly for the PV and PT (interclass correlation coefficient [ICC] 0.989 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.97-0.99] and ICC 0.936 [95% CI 0.86-0.97], respectively). Interobserver agreement was good for the PV (ICC 0.963 [95% CI 0.91-0.98]), PT (ICC 0.822 [95% CI 0.63-0.91]), and CP (ICC 0.708 [95% CI 0.44-0.86]), but moderate for BP and FUS. CONCLUSIONS: PV, PT, and CP are reproducible measurements to evaluate first trimester placental biometry. Further research is needed to assess the clinical utility of these variables as predictors of poor obstetric outcomes.

Maternal risk factors and obstetric complications in late preterm prematurity.

OBJECTIVE: Late preterm prematurity has been related to poorer neonatal outcomes. However, research has focused on the neonatal outcomes of late preterm infants, maternal characteristics of these births have been less evaluated. The aim of the study was to compare maternal risk factors and obstetric complications in late preterm births (LPTB) and term births. These factors were also assessed comparing spontaneous LPTB with medically-indicated LPTB. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective cohort study with two groups. All singleton LPTB occurred at our University Hospital between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2010 were included in the first cohort (n=171). A comparison cohort of term births was configured in a ratio 2:1 (n=342). Well-dated pregnancies without congenital malformations, congenital infections or chromosome abnormalities were eligible. LPTB were classified into two groups, spontaneous LPTB and medically-indicated LPTB following delivery indications. Statistical analysis of categorical variables was performed using either χ(2) or Fisher's exact. Continuous variables were compared using the Student's t-test. RESULTS: Women with LPTB had more medical conditions than women with term births (29% vs 15.7%; P=0.002). Prior preterm births (9.7% vs 2%; P<0.001), prior adverse obstetric outcomes (6.9% vs 2.3%; P<0.001), and obstetric complications were also more frequent in LPTB than in term births. However, no differences were found in maternal medical conditions when spontaneous LPTB and medically-indicated LPTB were compared. Women with medically-indicated LPTB were older (33.69 vs 31.07; P=0.003) and mainly nulliparous (75.8% vs 49.4%; P=0.002). Obstetric complications were more frequent in medically-indicated LPTB than in spontaneous LPTB. CONCLUSIONS: Maternal risk factors and obstetric complications are significantly higher in LPTB than in term births. These factors should be considered to identify women at risk for either spontaneous or medically-indicated LPTB.

Effect of changes to cost and availability of emergency contraception on users' profiles in an emergency department in Catalunya.

OBJECTIVE: Emergency contraception (EC) accessibility has evolved differently in Catalunya as compared with other autonomous communities in Spain. Free-of-charge access within the Public Health System was authorised in 2004, and over-the-counter (OTC) access was implemented in 2009. The aim of the study is to assess the impact of these measures on demand and users' profiles at our institution. METHODS: A retrospective study, in our Emergency Department, was conducted to evaluate EC requests in relationship to accessibility modifications. The age of women and which days of the week they attended were analysed. RESULTS: The number of EC requests, the distribution by age and the demand over the week remained stable after access to EC became free of charge. However, requests sharply decreased following OTC access implementation. Distribution by age also changed, with a significant increase in requests from women under 25 years (72% vs 56%, p < 0.001). Demand was greatest on Sunday and Monday, and this distribution persisted over the study period. CONCLUSION: EC requests remained unchanged following free-of-charge access to EC, but decreased after OTC implementation. Women currently seeking EC at no cost at our institution are more likely to be younger and to request it on a Monday.