Genetic variation across the human olfactory receptor repertoire alters odor perception.

Humans use a family of more than 400 olfactory receptors (ORs) to detect odors, but there is currently no model that can predict olfactory perception from receptor activity patterns. Genetic variation in human ORs is abundant and alters receptor function, allowing us to examine the relationship between receptor function and perception. We sequenced the OR repertoire in 332 individuals and examined how genetic variation affected 276 olfactory phenotypes, including the perceived intensity and pleasantness of 68 odorants at two concentrations, detection thresholds of three odorants, and general olfactory acuity. Genetic variation in a single OR was frequently associated with changes in odorant perception, and we validated 10 cases in which in vitro OR function correlated with in vivo odorant perception using a functional assay. In 8 of these 10 cases, reduced receptor function was associated with reduced intensity perception. In addition, we used participant genotypes to quantify genetic ancestry and found that, in combination with single OR genotype, age, and gender, we can explain between 10% and 20% of the perceptual variation in 15 olfactory phenotypes, highlighting the importance of single OR genotype, ancestry, and demographic factors in the variation of olfactory perception.

Interventions that cause weight loss and the impact on cardiovascular risk factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Overweight and obesity increase the risks of diabetes and cardiovascular disease (CVD). This has been shown to be reversed with weight loss. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to determine the effect of weight loss in the primary prevention of CVD. PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library databases were searched electronically through to May 2013. Randomized controlled trials assessing weight loss and cardiovascular risk factors and outcomes were included. A random effects meta-analysis, with sub-group analyses for degree of weight loss, and age were performed. Because few studies reported clinical outcomes of CVD, analyses were limited to cardiovascular risk factors (83 studies). Interventions that caused any weight loss significantly reduced systolic blood pressure (-2.68 mmHg, 95% CI -3.37, -2.11), diastolic blood pressure (-1.34 mmHg, 95% CI -1.71, -0.97), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-0.20 mmol L(-1) , 95% CI -0.29, -0.10), triglycerides (-0.13 mmol L(-1) , 95% CI -0.22, -0.03), fasting plasma glucose (-0.32 mmol L(-1) , 95% CI -0.43, -0.22) and haemoglobin A1c(-0.40%, 95% CI -0.52, -0.28) over 6-12 months. Significant changes remained after 2 years for several risk factors. Similar results were seen in sub-group analyses. Interventions that cause weight loss are effective at improving cardiovascular risk factors at least for 2 years. © 2016 World Obesity.

Portal hypertension: a review of portosystemic collateral pathways and endovascular interventions.

The portal vein is formed at the confluence of the splenic and superior mesenteric vein behind the head of the pancreas. Normal blood pressure within the portal system varies between 5 and 10 mmHg. Portal hypertension is defined when the gradient between the portal and systemic venous blood pressure exceeds 5 mmHg. The most common cause of portal hypertension is cirrhosis. In cirrhosis, portal hypertension develops due to extensive fibrosis within the liver parenchyma causing increased vascular resistance. In addition, the inability of the liver to metabolise certain vasodilators leads to hyperdynamic splanchnic circulation resulting in increased portal blood flow. Decompression of the portal pressure is achieved by formation of portosystemic collaterals. In this review, we will discuss the pathophysiology, anatomy, and imaging findings of spontaneous portosystemic collaterals and clinical manifestations of portal hypertension with emphasis on the role of interventional radiology in the management of complications related to portal hypertension.

What we still do not know about adrenal vein sampling for primary aldosteronism.

During the last two decades, primary aldosteronism has emerged as the most common cause of secondary hypertension, and advances in the diagnosis and treatment of this condition have improved patient care substantially. A major stumbling block in the evaluation and management of these patients, which ultimately guides treatment and prognosis, is answering the question, "Which adrenal gland(s) produce aldosterone?" Adrenal vein sampling has emerged as the only reliable method to determine the answer to this question; however, the methodology and criteria for lateralization have been determined empirically with little prospective data. The major remaining controversies surrounding adrenal vein sampling include: who should perform and who should undergo the procedure; what criteria should be used to define a successful study and lateralization of aldosterone production; whether cosyntropin should be infused during the procedure and how; and what to do when results are ambiguous? This article reviews some of the advances in the execution of this procedure, the variations in procedure, the data that fuel the controversies, and the issues that need to be resolved in the future.

Motor responses of autoimmune NZB/B1NJ and C57BL/6Nnia mice to arecoline and nicotine.

In 11-13 month C57BL/6Nnia mice, arecoline produced a dose-dependent decrease in motor activity at doses of 0.64-2.5 mg/kg, whereas at doses of 5.0-20.0 mg/kg arecoline produced a dose-dependent increase in motor activity. In marked contrast, age-matched NZB/B1NJ (New Zealand Black) mice failed to exhibit the first phase of the response, but showed a greater dose-dependent increase in motor activity following the doses of 10 and 20 mg/kg. Nicotine, 0.64-2.5 mg/kg, produced a dose-dependent decrease in motor activity in both strains. The effects of arecoline and nicotine were antagonized by scopolamine (2.5 mg/kg) and mecamylamine (1.0 mg/kg), respectively. These findings suggest that muscarinic neurotransmission may be altered in NZB/B1NJ mice, which produce brain-reactive autoantibodies, exhibit learning/memory dysfunctions, and also exhibit a loss of neurons staining positive for choline acetyltransferase.