Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
Am J Health Syst Pharm ; 76(13): 992-997, 2019 Jun 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31415686

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To describe the methods used in the development of an intravenous chemotherapy workload and productivity dashboard and its impact on symptoms of burnout and technician turnover. SUMMARY: In February 2017, chemotherapy sterile preparation pharmacy technicians reported symptoms of burnout as a result of perceived increase in workload. In response, an i.v. chemotherapy workload and productivity dashboard was developed at an academic medical center to validate workload in comparison to the reported job stress of pharmacy technicians. The dashboard provided pharmacy leadership objective data to validate staff concerns and leveraged lean principles to level-load the work prior to requesting additional full-time equivalents (FTEs) to senior leadership. The rate of turnover of i.v. chemotherapy technicians was assessed before (December 2016-June 2017) and after (July 2017-January 2018) dashboard implementation and approval of an additional i.v. chemotherapy technician FTE. The addition of the new FTE resulted in a decrease in productivity from an average of 106% (range 67%-151%) to 84% (range 65%-110%). The interventions allowed for the ability to leverage a staffing-to-demand model, resulting in the observed improvement in technician symptoms of burnout and a notable decrease in the overall turnover rate of i.v. chemotherapy technicians. CONCLUSION: The i.v. chemotherapy workload and productivity dashboard confirmed frontline staff perception and provided data to support the addition of labor resource and an opportunity to leverage a staffing-to-demand model to decrease symptoms of burnout and technician turnover.


Subject(s)
Efficiency, Organizational , Personnel Turnover/statistics & numerical data , Pharmacy Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Pharmacy Technicians/statistics & numerical data , Workload/statistics & numerical data , Administration, Intravenous , Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Attitude of Health Personnel , Burnout, Professional/epidemiology , Burnout, Professional/prevention & control , Burnout, Professional/psychology , Health Plan Implementation , Humans , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Pharmacy Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Pharmacy Technicians/psychology , Program Development , Program Evaluation , Workload/psychology
2.
Am J Health Syst Pharm ; 74(17 Supplement 3): S75-S83, 2017 Sep 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28842521

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The impact of a quality-assessment dashboard and individualized pharmacist performance feedback on the adherence of order verification was evaluated. METHODS: A before-and-after study was conducted at a 1,440-bed academic medical center. Adherence of order verification was defined as orders verified according to institution-derived, medication-related guidelines and policies. Formulas were developed to assess the adherence of verified orders to dosing guidelines using patient-specific height, weight, and serum creatinine clearance values from the electronic medical record at the time of pharmacist verification. A total of 5 medications were assessed by the formulas for adherence and displayed on the dashboard: ampicillin-sulbactam, ciprofloxacin, piperacillin-tazobactam, acyclovir, and enoxaparin. Adherence of order verification was assessed before (May 1-July 31, 2015) and after (November 1, 2015-January 31, 2016) individualized performance feedback was given based on trends identified by the quality-assessment dashboard. RESULTS: There was a significant increase in the overall adherence rate postintervention (90.1% versus 91.9%, p = 0.040). Among the 34 pharmacists who participated, the percentage of pharmacists with at least 90% overall adherence increased postintervention (52.9% versus 70.6%, p = 0.103). Time to verification was similar before and after the study intervention (median, 6.0 minutes; interquartile range, 3-13 minutes). The rate of documentation for nonadherent orders increased significantly postintervention (57.1% versus 68.5%, p = 0.019). CONCLUSION: The implementation of the quality-assessment dashboard, educational sessions, and individualized performance feedback significantly improved pharmacist order-verification adherence to institution-derived, medication-related guidelines and policies and the documentation rate of nonadherent orders.


Subject(s)
Employee Performance Appraisal/methods , Feedback , Pharmacists/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards , Quality Improvement/organization & administration , Academic Medical Centers/standards , Benchmarking/standards , Drug Dosage Calculations , Hospital Bed Capacity, 500 and over , Humans , Quality Improvement/standards , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...