Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Behav Brain Res ; 332: 59-63, 2017 08 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28559180

ABSTRACT

Physiological effects of different types, of continuous and interval aerobic training, have been largely described and studied in the adult man. It was previously indicated that interval training plays an important role in maximizing both peripheral muscle and central cardiorespiratory adaptations, permitting significant functional improvement even in healthy sedentary subjects. Since the outcome of different aerobic training trials on cognitive processes had never been evaluated, we compared, on an experimental mouse model, the effects of four training exercise protocols, named respectively C100, I100, C50 and I50 depending on the volume and on the type of training proposed, continuous or interval method. Therefore, to asses quantitative and qualitative functional changes, we analyzed several physical parameters before and after 6 weeks training in all four groups with respect to the control sedentary animals and we studied synaptic plasticity, by extracellular in vitro recordings, in hippocampal mouse slices, a region involved in learning and memory processes. We found that all four protocols of exercise applied in this study exerted positive effects on both physical and training parameters inducing weight augmentation, strength endurance and aerobic endurance increase, and potentiation of motor coordination. However, the improvement observed failed to induce an enhancement in synaptic plasticity in three out of four exercise protocols and only in the slices from mice trained with the interval 50% volume exercise the long term potentiation (LTP) increased with respect to the sedentary group. These findings suggest that motor activity exerts positive effects on cognitive processes provided that certain principles are respected, such as the training load and the elements of which it is composed, in order to plan the right quantitative and qualitative parameters and the appropriate recovery periods.


Subject(s)
Hippocampus/physiology , Motor Activity/physiology , Neuronal Plasticity/physiology , Animals , Mice, Inbred BALB C , Models, Animal , Physical Endurance/physiology , Random Allocation , Rotarod Performance Test , Time Factors , Tissue Culture Techniques
2.
J Sports Med Phys Fitness ; 55(11): 1265-71, 2015 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25369278

ABSTRACT

AIM: In water polo, throwing is one of the most important and frequently used technical skills for the player. There is no scientific literature that provides information about differences in throwing between elite and sub-elite water polo players. The aim of our study was to study differences in throwing velocities and kinematic variables in elite and sub-elite level male water polo players. METHODS: We considered the variables under standardized conditions during a typical motion, the five-meter shot (penalty). Thirty-four athletes from the Men's First Division Water Polo Championship and forty-two players participating in the National Fourth Division League, took part in the study. Video analysis measures were taken with high-speed digital cameras and the videos were analyzed offline with Dartfish 5.0 Pro. RESULTS: No correlation was found between body mass, height and throwing velocity. Elite players had higher values ​for ball speed (22.8±2.4 m/s for elite team and 18.4±1.7 m/s for sub-elite team; P=0.002) and greater elbow angle (157.5±10.3 degree for elite team versus 146.7±8.9 degree for sub-elite team; P=0.002). In elite team the throwing time was lower (165.6±22.2 and 188.6±23.9 ms, respectively; P=0.05) and the shoulder angle was smaller (115.1±10.3 and 123.8±12.4 degree, respectively; P=0.03) than in sub-elite team. Head height was significantly greater in elite players (elite players 71.1±8.7 cm, sub-elite players 65.6±6.2 cm; P=0.03). CONCLUSION: Differences in kinematic characteristics between elite and sub-elite players were showed. Differences in elbow and shoulder action must be considered both in training and injury prevention.


Subject(s)
Athletic Performance/physiology , Sports/physiology , Adult , Arm/physiology , Biomechanical Phenomena , Body Height/physiology , Body Mass Index , Elbow Joint/physiology , Humans , Male , Reaction Time , Shoulder Joint/physiology , Torso/physiology , Video Recording/methods , Wrist Joint/physiology , Young Adult
3.
J Sports Med Phys Fitness ; 54(1): 27-33, 2014 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24445542

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Two types of detraining can be described: short-term detraining with a period of less than 4 weeks, and long-term detraining (period longer than 4 weeks). The purpose of this study is to verify the presence and eventually the magnitude of physiological cardiorespiratory changes in young team sport players after a period of long-term detraining. METHODS: Fourteen young soccer players (15 ± 1 year) were studied with two incremental tests at the end of the regular season and after a six-week total break period from training activities. Physiological variables were evaluated: heart rate (HR), oxygen uptake (VO2), volume of ventilation (VE), aerobic (VA) and anaerobic (Van) running speed at thresholds and maximum effort were recorded. RESULTS: This study shows the magnitude of the physiological changes in young players after a period of long-term detraining. The results showed significant decreases at the end of the detraining period of VO2 at VA of 22.7% (44.54 ± 4.56 vs. 34.41 ± 4.57 mL/kg/min, P<0.05), of 25.8% of VO2 at VAn (54.60 ± 5.81 vs. 40.48 ± 5.07 mL/kg/min, P<0.05) and of 21.2% in VO2 max (62.83 ± 5.77 vs. 49.46 ± 6.51 mL/kg/min, P<0.05). Speed at VA (11.5 ± 0.96 vs. 10.7 ± 0.97 km/h; P<0.05), speed at VAn (15.3 ± 1.05 vs. 14.2 ± 1.48 km/h; P<0.05), peak running speed (18.8 ± 1.20 vs. 17.2 ± 1.1 km/h; P<0.05). CONCLUSION: It is likely that alteration of metabolic parameters may significantly affect the range of physical condition and especially, aerobic-anaerobic resistance and maintenance training would be advisable in young athletes during the transition period. Given the relevance of worsening demonstrated by our data, coaches should avoid very long periods of complete rest (no more than 15 days) at the end of the season.


Subject(s)
Rest/physiology , Soccer/physiology , Adolescent , Anaerobic Threshold/physiology , Carbon Dioxide/analysis , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Oxygen Consumption/physiology , Pulmonary Ventilation/physiology , Running/physiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...