ABSTRACT
Introduction The rarity in detecting female urethral stricture (FUS) backed by the inconsistency regarding the cutoff on the caliber to direct any treatment for its increase poses a challenge to its existence. Therefore, the present study was conducted to determine the caliber of the urethra that clearly identifies a FUS. Materials and method In this prospective observational study conducted between November 2015 and July 2017, women with obstructive lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and a history of relief on at least a single urethral dilatation were included if the American Urological Association (AUA) score was more than seven and the maximum flow rate (Qmax) was less than 20 mL/sec. Of the 71 women recruited, 10 women had recognizable external causes: caruncle (five), mucosal prolapse (three), and meatal stenosis (two). The remaining 61 underwent voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) and urodynamics followed by urethrocystoscopy, if the findings suggested a stricture. A definitive diagnosis was sought in those without stricture disease. We categorized all patients as either having a "true" stricture or an alternate etiology. Categorical variables were presented in number and percentage (%) and continuous variables as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Results The mean dilatation ranged between one and six; the mean AUA score, ~17.82 ± 3.59; mean Qmax, ~10.21 ± 3.39 mL/sec; and the mean post-void residue (PVR), 106.65 ± 51 mL. A total of 29 patients were diagnosed to have stricture (dense = 17; flimsy = 12). None of the patients in this group had a urethral caliber of more than 14 French (Fr). Other etiologies were dysfunctional voiding (17), underactive bladder (seven), cystocele (four), and primary bladder neck obstruction (PBNO) (four). Conclusion Women with voiding LUTS should be screened for FUS only if the urethral caliber is ≤14 Fr.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) in relieving urinary retention in patients with advanced prostate cancer presenting with urinary retention or a high post-void residual urine volume (PVR). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced prostate cancer with an indwelling catheter for acute/chronic urinary retention, or with a high PVR (>200 mL) who had not received any previous treatment were included in the study. Patients with localised prostate cancer eligible for receiving any therapy aimed at cure were excluded. All enrolled patients were managed by ADT (LHRH antagonist/agonist or orchidectomy) combined with α-adrenoceptor antagonist/combined therapy for at least 1 month to a maximum of 3 months; they were given their first trial of voiding without catheter after 1 month, and monthly thereafter. RESULTS: A total of 101 patients received ADT of which 97 were able to void successfully at the end of 3 months. In all, 27 patients could void in the first month, followed by 50 in the second month, and an additional 20 in the third month. There was a significant decrease in prostate volume, PVR, and International Prostate Symptom Score, and maximum urinary flow rates improved with normalisation of renal functions and resolution of upper tract changes noted on ultrasonography. CONCLUSION: ADT can relieve retention and decrease PVR over a period of time obviating the need for channel transurethral resection of the prostate.
