Predictors of patient satisfaction with Mohs micrographic surgery at time of surgery and 3 months postsurgery: A prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Despite the importance of patient satisfaction in ensuring high-quality care, studies investigating patient satisfaction in Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) are limited. OBJECTIVE: We investigated the factors associated with patient satisfaction in MMS for nonmelanoma skin cancer and how patient satisfaction changes in the postoperative period. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study including 100 patients, patient satisfaction surveys were administered at the time of surgery and at 3 months postsurgery. Sociodemographic characteristics, medical history, and surgical parameters were collected by chart review. Univariate linear and logistic regression models were created to examine these relationships. RESULTS: Decreased satisfaction was observed in patients requiring 3 or more MMS stages both at the time of surgery (P = .047) and at 3 months post-surgery (P = .0244). Patients with morning procedures ending after 1:00 pm had decreased satisfaction at the time of surgery (P = .019). A decrease in patient satisfaction between the time of surgery and 3 months postsurgery was observed in patients with surgical sites on the extremities (P = .036), larger preoperative lesion sizes (P = .012), and larger defect sizes (P = .033). LIMITATIONS: Single-institution data, self-selection bias, and recall bias. CONCLUSION: Patient satisfaction with MMS is impacted by numerous factors and remains dynamic over time.

Association of sociodemographic characteristics with utilization of sentinel lymph node biopsy for American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition T1b cutaneous melanoma.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is an important staging and prognostic tool for cutaneous melanoma (CM). However, there exists a knowledge gap regarding whether sociodemographic characteristics are associated with receipt of SLNB for T1b CMs, for which there are no definitive recommendations for SLNB per current National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. We performed a retrospective analysis of the 2012-2018 National Cancer Database, identifying patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer staging manual 8th edition stage T1b CM, and used multivariable logistic regression to analyze associations between sociodemographic characteristics and receipt of SLNB. Among 40,458 patients with T1b CM, 23,813 (58.9%) received SLNB. Median age was 62 years, and most patients were male (57%) and non-Hispanic White (95%). In multivariable analyses, patients of Hispanic (aOR 0.67, 95%CI 0.48-0.94) and other (aOR 0.78, 95%CI 0.63-0.97) race/ethnicity, and patients aged > 75 (aOR 0.33, 95%CI 0.29-0.38), were less likely to receive SLNB. Conversely, patients in the highest of seven socioeconomic status levels (aOR 1.37, 95%CI 1.13-1.65) and those treated at higher-volume facilities (aOR 1.29, 95%CI 1.14-1.46) were more likely to receive SLNB. Understanding the underlying drivers of these associations may yield important insights for the management of patients with melanoma.

Asian American and Pacific Islander patients with melanoma have increased odds of treatment delays: A cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Asian American and Pacific Islander (AAPI) melanoma patients have higher mortality than non-Hispanic White (NHW) patients. Treatment delays may contribute, but whether AAPI patients have longer time from diagnosis to definitive surgery (TTDS) is unknown. OBJECTIVES: Investigate TTDS differences between AAPI and NHW melanoma patients. METHODS: Retrospective review of AAPI and NHW melanoma patients in the National Cancer Database (NCD) (2004-2020). The association of race with TTDS was evaluated by multivariable logistic regression, controlling for sociodemographic characteristics. RESULTS: Of 354,943 AAPI and NHW melanoma patients identified, 1155 (0.33%) were AAPI. AAPI patients had longer TTDS for stage I, II, and III melanoma (P < .05 for all). Adjusting for sociodemographic factors, AAPI patients had 1.5 times the odds of a TTDS between 61 and 90 days and twice the odds of a TTDS >90 days. Racial differences in TTDS persisted in Medicare and private insurance types. Uninsured AAPI patients had the longest TTDS (mean, 53.26 days), while those with private insurance had the shortest TTDS (mean, 34.92 days; P < .001 for both). LIMITATION: AAPI patients comprised 0.33% of the sample. CONCLUSIONS: AAPI melanoma patients have increased odds of treatment delays. Associated socioeconomic differences should inform efforts to reduce disparities in treatment and survival.

Sebaceous carcinoma in solid organ transplant recipients: The elegant path from epidemiology to etiology.

Sebaceous carcinoma (SC) is a rare skin cancer associated with rapid progression and relatively poor survival, particularly in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs). Immunosuppressive regimens place SOTRs at substantially increased risk of a variety of skin cancers; recent research has shown a 25-fold increase in SC in the SOTR population, especially among lung recipients, older males, those with longer time since transplant, and patients undergoing induction therapy with thymoglobulin. The potential etiologic mechanisms underlying SC are multifaceted and complex. Immunosuppression creates a microcosm through which to view causative factors for carcinogenesis which has implications in elucidating mechanistic etiologies for SC far beyond the SOTR population, since not all cancers are more common in immunosuppressed patients. Research integrating the role of oncogenic viruses, underlying medical conditions, genetic risk factors, toxicity of prophylactic medications, drug-induced photosensitization, and T-cell deficiency/dysfunction is needed to better elucidate the factors underlying SC in immunosuppressed hosts. In this report, we integrate current research regarding SC in SOTR patients using the causal pie/sufficient-component cause model. In doing so, we provide a paradigm through which to view future research regarding the etiology of SC.

A Clinical Decision Tool to Calculate Pretest Probability of Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis in Primary Cutaneous Melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Although sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) status is a strong prognostic indicator for cutaneous melanoma, unnecessary SLNBs have substantial cost and morbidity burden. OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to develop, validate, and present a personalized, clinical, decision-making tool using nationally representative data with clinically actionable probability thresholds (Expected Lymphatic Metastasis Outcome [ELMO]). METHODS: Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Registry from 2000 to 2017 and the National Cancer Database (NCDB) from 2004 to 2015 were used to develop and internally validate a logistic ridge regression predictive model for SLNB positivity. External validation was done with 1568 patients at a large tertiary referral center. RESULTS: The development cohort included 134,809 patients, and the internal validation cohort included 38,518 patients. ELMO (AUC 0.85) resulted in a 29.54% SLNB reduction rate and greater sensitivity in predicting SLNB status for T1b, T2a, and T2b tumors than previous models. In external validation, ELMO had an accuracy of 0.7586 and AUC of 0.7218. Limitations of this study are potential miscoding, unaccounted confounders, and effect modification. CONCLUSIONS: ELMO ( https://melanoma-sentinel.herokuapp.com/ ) has been developed and validated (internally and externally) by using the largest publicly available dataset of melanoma patients and was found to have high accuracy compared with other published models and gene expression tests. Individualized risk estimates for SLNB positivity are critical in facilitating thorough decision-making for healthcare providers and patients with melanoma.

Increasing medicare charge-to-payment ratios for dermatologists from 2012 to 2017.

Government-backed medical insurance plans have undergone significant changes in the last decade, but more information is needed to understand reimbursement trends, particularly for specialist medical services. The objective of this study was to identify the ratios of submitted dermatology service charges to allowed Medicare payments over the years. Further variables studied include regional or state variations, gender of provider, hierarchical condition category (HCC) risk scores of patient complexity, and number of services. Data were collected from publicly available Medicare Part B Provider Utilization and Payment Data: Physician and Other Supplier 2012-2017 datasets. All data analysis was performed on SAS 9.4 Statistical Software.Total dermatology related medicare charges-to-payment ratios steadily increased over the years (1.77 [in 2012], 1.82 [2013], 1.87 [2014], 1.95 [2015], 2.02 [2016], and 2.06 [2017]). This suggests that for every $2.06 charged in 2017, dermatology providers could expect $1 of actual payment. When further stratified into medical services vs. drug services, this upward trend remained for medical charges but drug service ratios have remained constant. There was also significant geographic variation in total medicare charges-to-payment ratios as states in the Midwest (mean total ratio: 2.48) had higher charges to payment gaps than states in the Northeast (2.26), West (2.16), and South (1.99; p = 0.01).This study identifies trends and variables associated with dermatology medicare payments. Providers may use this information to better understand changing payment structures in their own practices and hopefully these results can be valuable in future policy discussions.

Financial stress among skin cancer patients: a cross-sectional review of the 2013-2018 National Health Interview Survey.

Financial stress among skin cancer patients may limit treatment efficacy by forcing the postponement of care or decreasing adherence to dermatologist recommendations. Limited information is available quantifying the anxiety experienced by skin cancer patients from both healthcare and non-healthcare factors. Therefore, the present study sought to perform a retrospective cross-sectional review of the 2013-2018 cycles of the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) to determine the prevalence, at-risk groups, and predictive factors of skin cancer patient financial stress. Survey responses estimated that 11.45% (95% Cl 10.02-12.88%) of skin cancer patients experience problems paying medical bills, 20.34% (95% Cl 18.97-21.71%) of patients worry about the medical costs, 13.73% (95% Cl 12.55-14.91%) of patients worry about housing costs, and 37.48% (95% Cl 35.83-39.14%) of patients worry about money for retirement. Focusing on at-risk groups, black patients, uninsured patients, and patients with low incomes (< 200% poverty level) consistently experienced high rates of financial stress for each of the four measures. Multivariable logistic regression revealed low education, lack of insurance, and low income to be predictive of financial stress. These findings suggest that a considerable proportion of skin cancer patients experience financial stress related to both healthcare and non-healthcare factors. Where possible, the additional intricacy of treating patients at risk of high financial stress may be considered to optimize patient experience and outcomes.

Emergency department utilization among skin cancer patients: a retrospective study of the national emergency department sample 2013-2015.

Skin cancer-related emergency department (ED) visits are among the most common cancer-related ED visits in the USA. However, ED utilization among skin cancer patients has not been evaluated. To assess overall utilization of EDs among skin cancer patients, reasons for skin cancer-related visits, and factors associated with inpatient admission. This was a retrospective, cross-sectional study of adults with skin cancer presenting to EDs using years 2013-2015 of the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample. In total, 693,835 of the 223,329,909 weighted ED visits were made by patients with skin cancer. Visits among this population were frequently due to age-related comorbidities and skin cancer treatment-specific adverse events. Melanoma accounted for the minority of skin cancer-related visits (27.58%), but over half of subsequent inpatient admissions (51.18%) and was associated with greater odds of inpatient admission compared to keratinocyte carcinoma (OR 1.278, 95% CI 1.264-1.293). Treatment and staging codes were not available, and thus, differences in ED utilization among skin cancer stages and treatment approaches could not be assessed. Ultimately, these findings are important in improving anticipatory outpatient care for patients with skin cancer and in guiding appropriate management of this unique population in the ED.