Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants ; 32(4): 864-869, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28708920

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of the implant-retained zirconia complete-arch prosthesis with various opposing dentitions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The 40 patients included in this retrospective case series study were treated with one or two implant-retained zirconia complete-arch prostheses (ZIRCAP) using the Zirkonzahn protocol. Prettau zirconia frames were created with strategic cutbacks in the structure to extend zirconia incisal coverage of the esthetic anterior sextants and complete monolithic zirconia in the molar areas; subsequent layers of porcelain were applied to nonfunctional and esthetic areas. Patients had three possible occlusal scenarios: (1) maxillary ZIRCAP and mandibular ZIRCAP, (2) maxillary ZIRCAP and mandibular natural dentition, and (3) maxillary ZIRCAP and mandibular conventional hybrid prosthesis. Complications were recorded during follow-up appointments 3, 6, and 12 months after definitive prosthesis delivery. The mean treatment observation period was 33 months. RESULTS: Eight prosthetic complications were noted for the 40 implant-retained zirconia complete-arch prostheses (18.18%), including six cases of minor porcelain chipping and two cases of debonding of the metal insert from the zirconia framework. Maxillary ZIRCAP opposing mandibular ZIRCAP and maxillary ZIRCAP opposing mandibular natural dentition occlusal scenarios presented the same complication ratio of 4. No complications were seen in the maxillary ZIRCAP opposing mandibular conventional hybrid prosthesis group, yet 16 complications were found as denture tooth fractures in 12 mandibular conventional hybrid prostheses (ratio of 0.75). CONCLUSION: The results indicate that the implant-retained zirconia complete-arch prosthesis offers acceptable performance for use as an alternative to the conventional titanium framework acrylic veneer prosthesis for complete edentulism with a lower incidence of prosthetic complications and fewer maintenance appointments. Chipping of veneering porcelain was the most common complication, but a low incidence was observed in this study. Acrylic denture teeth may represent the weakest link when restoring complete edentulism with a maxillary ZIRCAP and mandibular conventional hybrid prosthesis.


Subject(s)
Dental Arch/surgery , Dental Materials/chemistry , Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported , Dental Restoration Failure , Mouth, Edentulous/surgery , Zirconium/chemistry , Dental Porcelain/chemistry , Dentition , Esthetics, Dental , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Titanium/chemistry
2.
Clin Oral Investig ; 8(4): 196-205, 2004 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15583918

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Bone augmentation procedures in combination with dental implants enhance osseointegration in areas that demonstrate localized bone deficit. Clinical confirmation of a biomechanically stable interface is essential for functional implant loading. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate biomechanically the effect of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein (rhBMP)-2 on implant osseointegration and correlate it with periotest and radiographic measurements. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Hollow cylinder implants were filled with absorbable collagen sponge soaked with rhBMP-2 or left empty and implanted in dog mandibles. The animals were followed for 4, 8, and 12 weeks, periotest assessment was performed at the end of each time interval, and specimens were collected for pullout biomechanical testing and radiographic evaluation of bone-implant contact levels. RESULTS: Periotest assessment did not provide evidence of statistically significant differences between the two groups and correlated well with the radiographic bone-implant contact levels. The pullout test revealed a higher correlation between force/displacement and displacement/energy for the experimental group, suggesting that the addition of rhBMP-2 did influence the rate of osseointegration. CONCLUSION: The results from the pullout test support the potential role of rhBMP-2 in clinical applications by promoting a biomechanically mature interface at 12 weeks. However, radiographic and periotest assessment of the bone-implant interface did not provide evidence of the differences observed with biomechanical testing.


Subject(s)
Bone Morphogenetic Proteins/pharmacology , Dental Implants , Osseointegration/drug effects , Transforming Growth Factor beta/pharmacology , Animals , Biomechanical Phenomena , Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2 , Dental Prosthesis Design , Dogs , Drug Carriers , Gelatin Sponge, Absorbable , Humans , Male , Mandible/diagnostic imaging , Mandible/drug effects , Mandible/surgery , Osteotomy , Radiography , Recombinant Proteins , Stress, Mechanical , Surface Properties , Surgical Flaps , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...