Cardiac psychology training in a rural health care setting: East Carolina Heart Institute.

The full partnership of clinical health psychology and cardiology optimizes patient-centered care to address the mental and behavioral needs of patients living with heart disease. This scenario is realized as the East Carolina Heart Institute (ECHI) at East Carolina University (ECU) in Greenville, North Caroline with co-location and co-training of psychologists and cardiologists. ECHI provides services to patients across the full disease continuum of cardiovascular disease (CVD), given the higher rates of heart disease in this rural area. The purpose of this article is to describe the cardiovascular behavioral medicine training model for clinical health psychology doctoral students and its adaptation during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) era. Through illustrative case examples, we describe the training model before the COVID-19 pandemic, during the transition to telehealth following the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, and then the entirely telehealth-based service model. We highlight notable strengths and challenges to delivering telehealth care to cardiac patients in a rural setting, while also discussing the health disparities that uniquely occur within this patient population in Eastern North Carolina. This innovative partnership fosters a responsive environment for training and clinical care, where the complex needs of patients with CVD are treated to increase their overall quality of life and well-being. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Managing atrial fibrillation: The intersection of cardiology, health psychology, and the patient experience.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac dysrhythmia and is an accelerating public health challenge. Challenges related to detection, management, and prevention of disability and dysfunction secondary to AF are increasingly apparent. The subspecialty of cardiology, cardiac electrophysiology, is primarily tasked with the treatment of AF. Patients with AF are often ambushed by the condition with approximately 28% to 38% of patients experiencing significant anxiety or depressive symptoms. Behavioral risk reduction can be targeted by achieving and maintaining a healthy BMI, abstaining from smoking, avoiding alcohol consumption, and sustaining regular physical activity. AF patients are also tasked with considering possible treatment options, adhering to medication regiments & lifestyle changes, utilizing wearable technologies, and managing emotional distress, to minimize health risks and optimize quality of life. Major medical organizations have called for integrated, multidisciplinary management as the treatment of choice for AF patients. Health psychologists bring valuable expertise but are not uniformly involved in the care of AF patients. The purposes of this article are to (a) review the existing research on the medical, psychological, and behavioral aspects of contemporary management of AF, (b) highlight the intersections between cardiac electrophysiology and clinical health psychology in managing AF, and (c) call for more health psychologists in this specialized area of cardiac electrophysiology. This opportunity for health psychologists may challenge the profession to further specialize as "cardiac psychologists" and mirror our medical colleagues. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on physical and mental health in the two largest economies in the world: a comparison between the United States and China.

The broad impact of the COVID-19 on self-reported daily behaviors and health in Chinese and US samples remains unknown. This study aimed to compare physical and mental health between people from the United States (U.S.) and China, and to correlate mental health parameters with variables relating to physical symptoms, knowledge about COVID-19, and precautionary health behaviors. To minimize risk of exposure, respondents were electronically invited by existing study respondents or by data sourcing software and surveys were completed via online survey platforms. Information was collected on demographics, physical symptoms, contact history, knowledge about COVID-19, psychologic parameters (i.e. IES-R; DASS-21), and health behaviors. The study included a total of 1445 respondents (584 U.S.; 861 China). Overall, Americans reported more physical symptoms, contact history, and perceived likelihood of contracting COVID-19. Americans reported more stress and depressive symptoms, while Chinese reported higher acute-traumatic stress symptoms. Differences were identified regarding face mask use and desires for COVID-19 related health information, with differential mental health implications. Physical symptoms that were possibly COVID-19 related were associated with adverse mental health. Overall, American and Chinese participants reported different mental and physical health parameters, health behaviors, precautionary measures, and knowledge of COVID-19; different risk and protective factors were also identified.

Measurement of patient confidence in self-management of atrial fibrillation: Initial validation of the Confidence in Atrial fibriLlation Management (CALM) Scale.

BACKGROUND: The patient experience of atrial fibrillation (AF) involves several daily self-care behaviors and ongoing confidence to manage their condition. Currently, no standardized self-report measure of AF patient confidence exists. The purpose of this study is to provide preliminary support for the reliability and validity of a newly developed confidence in AF management measure. METHODS: This study provides preliminary analysis of the Confidence in Atrial FibriLlation Management (CALM) scale, which was rationally developed to measure patient confidence related to self-management of AF. The scale was provided to a sample of AF patients N = 120, (59% male) electronically through a patient education platform. Principal component analysis (PCA) and Cronbach's α were employed to provide preliminary assessment of the validity and reliability of the measure. RESULTS: PCA identified a four-factor solution. Internal consistency of the CALM was considered excellent with Cronbach's α = .910. Additional PCA confirmed the value of a single factor solution to produce a total confidence score for improved utility and ease of clinical interpretation. CONCLUSIONS: Initial assessment of a novel scale measuring patient confidence in managing AF provided promising reliability and validity. Patient confidence in self-management of AF may prove useful as a key marker and endpoint of the patient experience beyond QOL.

A chain mediation model on COVID-19 symptoms and mental health outcomes in Americans, Asians and Europeans.

The novel Coronavirus-2019 (COVID-19) was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO) in March 2020, impacting the lifestyles, economy, physical and mental health of individuals globally. This study aimed to test the model triggered by physical symptoms resembling COVID-19 infection, in which the need for health information and perceived impact of the pandemic mediated the path sequentially, leading to adverse mental health outcomes. A cross-sectional research design with chain mediation model involving 4612 participants from participating 8 countries selected via a respondent-driven sampling strategy was used. Participants completed online questionnaires on physical symptoms, the need for health information, the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) questionnaire and Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21). The results showed that Poland and the Philippines were the two countries with the highest levels of anxiety, depression and stress; conversely, Vietnam had the lowest mean scores in these areas. Chain mediation model showed the need for health information, and the perceived impact of the pandemic were sequential mediators between physical symptoms resembling COVID-19 infection (predictor) and consequent mental health status (outcome). Excessive and contradictory health information might increase the perceived impact of the pandemic. Rapid COVID-19 testing should be implemented to minimize the psychological burden associated with physical symptoms, whilst public mental health interventions could target adverse mental outcomes associated with the pandemic.

Patient reported outcomes and quality of life in Chinese patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators✰.

OBJECTIVES: Patient reported outcomes in Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) patients can describe the experience of living with heart disease and with an ICD. However, very little is known about patient outcomes among Chinese patients which may limit effective patient discussions and interventions for these patients. The purposes of this study were to examine device related experiences (e.g., device acceptance, shock anxiety) in Chinese ICD patients and identify potential variables that influence health related quality of life (HRQOL) and to compare HRQOL outcomes to healthy and heart failure populations. METHODS: This study used a cross-sectional research design with serially recruited ICD patients (N = 100) from clinics in China. Participants completed surveys including: the 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey Questionnaire (SF-12), Florida Patient Acceptance Survey (FPAS), Florida Shock Anxiety Scale (FSAS), Type D Scale (DS-14), and general information questionnaire. RESULTS: Participants were 100 ICD patients in China with a mean age of 53.32(SD = 13.70). The mean scores of the SF-12 physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS)of ICD patients (43.55 and 47.07, respectively) were lower than the Chinese general population (P<0.001) and general health, social functioning, and role emotional scores were lower than chronic heart failure patients (P<0.001). Multiple linear regression analysis indicated that LVEF, positive shock history, age and shock anxiety were significant predictors of physical function and accounted for 24.5% of the adjusted variance. Type D personality, shock history, and shock anxiety were predictors of the mental health component and accounted for 25.9% of the variance. Shock history, age, type D personality, and shock anxiety significantly predicted device acceptance (FPAS-Total) and accounted for 32% of variance. CONCLUSIONS: ICD patients reported health outcomes were generally lower than the Chinese general population and patients with heart failure in relation to general health, social functioning, and role emotional. Both generic and disease specific HRQOL were influenced by both medical and psychosocial predictors. This suggests that current Western society based comprehensive models of patient HRQOL and patient care needs may extend to Chinese patients with ICDs.

Collaborative care for the wearable cardioverter defibrillator patient: Getting the patient and medical team "vested and active".

Patients with a reduced ejection fraction of 35% or less and a history of myocardial infarction (MI) are at increased risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD). These patients have a class I indication for an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator after allowing time for medical therapy optimization and potential cardiac recovery. The rates of SCD are highest in this "gap" period early after a cardiac event, and the wearable cardioverter-defibrillator (WCD) is an intervention that can be used to protect against SCD during this time period. There has been a clinical trial that randomized patients with a reduced ejection fraction at the time of MI to a WCD versus control. Results of the trial showed no statistically significant difference in the primary endpoint of SCD. There are many intricacies to the interpretation of the trial, including the importance of patient adherence to WCD therapy, which is affected by the patient experience and psychological factors. Patients with a new cardiomyopathy are affected by a mix of psychological factors, including the feeling of safety and protection from a WCD contrasted by the WCD providing a reminder of awareness and fear of ventricular arrhythmias and SCD. Beyond the capabilities of a WCD to defibrillate a life-threatening ventricular arrhythmia, the device can also provide activity and heart failure diagnostics monitoring. Patients need to be engaged in shared decision-making conversations about a WCD, so that patients can make a decision based on their own values construct, ultimately increasing adherence among the patients that want a WCD.

Mobile-ECG screening in rural pharmacies: rates of atrial fibrillation and associated risk factors.

INTRODUCTION: Atrial fibrillation (AFib) is a growing health concern, affecting more than 40 million patients worldwide and increasing stroke risk by five times. Community screening initiatives in rural healthcare establishments are becoming more feasible with the development of innovative, mobile-ECG (mECG) technology. The purpose of this research was to characterize increased rates of stroke risk factors and to determine AFib incidence in rural, pharmacy settings. METHODS: The researchers examined the prevalence of risk factors associated with AFib and calculated CHA2DS2-VASc stroke risk scores in a previously undiagnosed AFib community sample of 250 participants. Eligible participants at two rural pharmacies were administered a 1-lead mECG reading. Participants were then asked to complete questionnaires on demographic and medical history information. All participants were given educational materials on AFib and medical referrals when indicated. RESULTS: Prevalence rates of six, known independent stroke risk factors (CHA2DS2-VASc scores: (2.68 ± 1.35)) were significantly higher in the study sample than reported national US averages. Screening via mECG indicated preliminary AFib rates of approximately 4%; however, upon independent adjudication of the readings from three electrophysiologists AFib prevalence ranged between 1% and 8%. DISCUSSION: Collectively, an alarming rate of untreated stroke risk in a rural pharmacy sample was identified by the researchers utilizing mECG technology. These results suggest potential value to the use of mECG technology to screen for AFib in at-risk communities.

Physical Activity in Adults With Wearable Cardioverter Defibrillators in the Post-Myocardial Infarction Period.

PURPOSE: Wearable cardioverter defibrillators (WCDs) provide lifesaving defibrillation and are equipped with accelerometers, capable of providing information on patient wear time and physical activity (PA). The purpose of this study was to report on patient PA while wearing a WCD. METHODS: This study derived data from the WCD vendor in patients prescribed WCD post-myocardial infarction (MI) with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35% in 2016. Using the device accelerometer, the relationship between wear time and PA was examined in a sample of consistent wearers of the WCD. Demographic variables, including sex and age, were examined for impact on wear time and PA. Changes in PA over time were also examined. RESULTS: A total of 1952 patients (71% male) with a median age of 63 yr were included. Descriptive analyses indicated that overall median wear time was 23.8 hr/d; PA was 5568 steps/d. Significant differences in PA over time were identified, with median steps increasing by 67% from the first week of wear to the last week of wear. Patient age and wear time significantly predicted PA; patient age also significantly predicted patient wear time. There were significant differences in median hours of wear time, as well as median steps, based on sex. CONCLUSIONS: PA in adults early after hospital discharge is modest and improves over the course of the 90-d WCD prescription in regular wearers. Improved health status may account for this change. The WCD accelerometer may have value in future clinical care and research by providing a window into daily patient PA levels via remote monitoring.

Evaluation and acceptance of mobile-electrocardiogram use in implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients - Can I see my ECG?

BACKGROUND: Medical technologies for consumers aim to help prevent, manage, and even forecast cardiovascular events, but their emotional impact is not fully known. The value of mobile-electrocardiogram (mECG) technology to an existing group of cardiac patients is unknown. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of readily available mECG capability for a sample of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) patients. METHODS: Patients with ICDs (N = 51) were recruited and consented in a large academic cardiology clinic. Participants were given a mECG device and asked to take a 30-ss reading at least once per day for 30 days. Technology satisfaction, cardiac anxiety, shock anxiety, and ICD device acceptance were measured pre- and post-mECG usage. RESULTS: mECG technology was regularly used (M = 36.6 readings completed per month) and positively appraised by ICD patients (mean of 4.4 out of possible 5). Self-reported symptoms of general cardiac anxiety were not significantly affected by the utilization of mECG technology. ICD specific measures were mixed with increased overall ICD device acceptance but also increased shock anxiety. CONCLUSIONS: ICD patients positively viewed and used mECG technology regularly as prescribed. However, the overall psychological impact of mECG was mixed and suggests that ICD patients may have idiosyncratic adjustments to the increased access of cardiac device data.

Measuring ICD shock anxiety: Status update on the Florida Shock Anxiety Scale after over a decade of use.

INTRODUCTION: Approximately 44% of patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) experience some form of shock anxiety, associated with cardiac fear, physical inactivity, and increased morbidity and mortality. The Florida Shock Anxiety Scale (FSAS) was created to measure ICD-specific fears for a more precise target of patient psychologic distress and potential need for intervention. The current paper describes results from a focused literature review of studies using FSAS over the past 15 years, with the aim of summarizing its current reliability and validity, associated outcomes, and potential future directions for its clinical and research implementation. METHODS: In this review, 26 peer-reviewed articles were analyzed and selected from an in-depth literature search of two electronic databases. RESULTS: The reliability and validity of FSAS has been upheld since its initial validation and remain positive. The majority of studies used FSAS as an assessment tool to evaluate a clinical need for psychologic support or psychoeducation. The most frequently reported predictors of FSAS shock anxiety include experience of shock, appropriate and inappropriate, and number of shocks experienced. Common correlates of higher FSAS scores include lower device-related knowledge, lower perceived support from healthcare providers, greater posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms, and negative attitudes about device dependency. Younger age and female gender are also associated with increased shock anxiety. CONCLUSIONS: Since 2006, FSAS has been widely represented as a valid and reliable assessment tool for quantifying device-related anxiety in ICD recipients in diverse populations. Future directions for FSAS should explore its potential role in support of measurement-based care.