ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In the diagnosis and treatment of biliary disorders, establishing percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) is an invasive procedure that can potentially lead to infectious complications in both the short and long-term. We therefore prospectively analysed the time course and spectrum of biliary bacteria in patients undergoing PTBD. METHODS: Forty-nine patients (19 F, 30 M; mean age 64 years) with malignant (65%) or benign (35%) biliary disorders were included, 20 of whom had a newly established PTBD (group A), while the remaining 29 had already had their PTBD in situ (group B) for a mean of 8 months. Bacteriological analyses of bile and blood were carried out, and clinical symptoms and laboratory values were obtained. RESULTS: Biliary bacteria were found in 60% of cases during the initial PTBD placement, and 24 h later this rate had already increased to 85%; two or more microorganisms were found in 40% initially and in 70% after a few days. At later PTBD exchanges, bacteriobilia was found in 100%, with all patients harbouring multiple organisms. Whereas the initial spectrum was mixed, Escherichia coli and enterococci (97% each), Klebsiella (73%) and Bacteroides species (37%) later predominated; Candida increased initially from 15% to 80%, but later decreased to 30%. Clinical signs of cholangitis were observed in 30% initially (no sepsis), but decreased to 6% at later exchanges. CONCLUSIONS: Bacteriobilia is initially a frequent, and later a regular, event in PTBD; however, clinically significant complications are rare during the long-term course and limited to the initial, more invasive, phase of PTBD. A knowledge of the bacterial spectrum is important for selecting appropriate antibiotic coverage if complications arise and/or major interventions such as surgery are planned.
Subject(s)
Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic/microbiology , Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic/surgery , Biliary Tract Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Drainage/adverse effects , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/etiology , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/etiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anti-Infective Agents/therapeutic use , Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde , Ciprofloxacin/therapeutic use , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/diagnosis , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/diagnosis , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pancreatitis, Acute Necrotizing/diagnosis , Pancreatitis, Acute Necrotizing/etiology , Pancreatitis, Acute Necrotizing/mortality , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Survival Analysis , Time Factors , Treatment FailureABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Long-term percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) is a valid alternative to surgery in patients with benign or malignant bile duct strictures in whom endoscopic drainage has failed. However, few data are available on the long-term outcome with percutaneous drainage, specially when the application of Yamakawa-type prostheses is considered. METHODS: During 1996, 48 patients who were either treated with primary PTBD insertion followed by PTBD exchanges (n = 15) or who presented only for exchange of an earlier PTBD (n = 33) were included in the study. Thirty-one patients had malignant strictures, and 17 had benign ones. The PTBD catheters were scheduled for exchange every 3 months or earlier if signs and symptoms of obstruction or other problems were present. The data were collected prospectively during each follow-up visit and included both symptoms and the status and function of the PTBD at the time of exchange. RESULTS: Although PTBD was highly effective in relieving jaundice (progression of cholestasis was observed in only 2 cases), 73 of the 157 PTBD exchanges (47%) had to be carried out earlier than scheduled. Premature exchange was needed for clinical reasons, such as fever indicating PTBD dysfunction, in only 19% of these cases. The other reasons were related to the PTBD catheter and consisted of bile leakage alongside the drain (33%), PTBD disconnection or complete dislocation (30%), or occlusion suspected during regular flushing of the drain (15%). In most cases exchanging the drain was sufficient to solve the problem; in cases of complete dislocation, dilation of the same tract (n = 6) or fresh puncture and establishment of a new drainage site (n = 2) were necessary. Reducing the PTBD exchange interval from 3 to 2 months would have decreased the number of premature stent exchanges by 26%. CONCLUSIONS: Although PTBD is an effective method of biliary drainage, there are frequently minor problems-mostly catheter-related-which require premature exchange of the drain in almost half of the cases, and this may affect the patients' quality of life. Improvements in PTBD materials and catheter design are therefore needed. The effectiveness of reducing the intervals between PTBD exchanges should also be examined.
