Comparative analysis of a rapid diagnostic test and scoring tools for ESBL detection in Enterobacterales bloodstream infections for optimizing antimicrobial therapy.

IMPORTANCE: Our study addresses a significant issue in the medical and scientific community-the delayed administration of appropriate antimicrobial treatments due to the time-consuming process of phenotypic susceptibility data collection in gram-negative bloodstream infections. Our research indicates that a multiplex PCR rapid diagnostic test (RDT) significantly outperformed two clinical scoring tools in predicting ceftriaxone susceptibility. Multiplex PCR also led to reduced instances of undertreatment with ceftriaxone and minimized overtreatment with carbapenems. Furthermore, multiplex PCR demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity in predicting ceftriaxone susceptibility. The results of our study underscore the potential RDTs to reduce the time to appropriate antimicrobial therapy, leading to improved patient outcomes and reduced healthcare costs.

No Implementation Without Representation: Real-Time Pharmacist Intervention Optimizes Rapid Diagnostic Tests for Bacteremia at a Small Community Hospital.

Background: Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for bacteremia allow for early antimicrobial therapy modification based on organism and resistance gene identification. Studies suggest patient outcomes are optimized when infectious disease (ID)-trained antimicrobial stewardship personnel intervene on RDT results. However, data are limited regarding RDT implementation at small community hospitals, which often lack access to on-site ID clinicians. Methods: This study evaluated the impact of RDTs with and without real-time pharmacist intervention (RTPI) at a small community hospital with local pharmacist training and asynchronous support from a remote ID Telehealth pharmacist. Time to targeted therapy (TTT) in patients with bacteremia was compared retrospectively across 3 different time periods: a control without RDT, RDT-only, and RDT with RTPI. Results: Median TTT was significantly faster in both the RDT with RTPI and RDT-only groups compared with the control group (2 vs 25 vs 51 hours respectively; P < .001). TTT was numerically faster for RDT with RTPI compared with RDT-only but did not reach statistical significance (P = .078). Median time to any de-escalation was significantly shorter for RDT with RTPI compared with both RDT-only (14 vs 33 hours; P = .012) and the control group (14 vs 45 hours; P < .001). Median length of stay was also significantly shorter in both RDT groups compared with the control group (4.0 vs 4.1 vs 5.5 hours; P = .013). Conclusion: This study supports RDT use for bacteremia in a small community hospital with ID Telehealth support, suggesting additional benefit with RTPI.

The effectiveness and safety of low dose trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for the treatment of pneumocystis pneumonia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) is an opportunistic fungal infection causing significant morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients. The conventional treatment of PJP is sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (SMX-TMP) dosed at 15-20 mg/kg/day of the trimethoprim component. Several studies have suggested similar mortality outcomes and an improved adverse effect profile using a lower dose (<15 mg/kg/day) SMX-TMP regimen. Our objective of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of lower dose SMX-TMP for PJP pneumonia. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the existing literature according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched from inception to January 15, 2020, for studies in English evaluating low-dose SMX-TMP (<15 mg/kg/day) compared to conventional dosing for the treatment of PJP. Outcomes evaluated in our meta-analysis include survival and adverse reactions. RESULTS: After excluding studies that did not meet our inclusion criteria, four studies were analyzed for adverse reactions and three for mortality. Overall, there was no significant difference in mortality between low-dose and conventional-dose SMX-TMP groups (relative risk [RR]: 0.55, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18-1.70). There was a significant decrease in the rate of adverse reactions for the low-dose group compared with the conventional-dose group (RR: 0.70, 95% CI, 0.53-0.91). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis shows a significant decrease in adverse reactions and similar mortality rates with lower-dose SMX-TMP compared to conventional dosing. A low-dose SMX-TMP regimen in the treatment of PJP should be considered a viable option as it could potentially decrease treatment discontinuation rates and reduce patient harm.

Impact of an Antimicrobial Stewardship Bundle for Uncomplicated Gram-Negative Bacteremia.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies in gram-negative bacteremia (GNB) suggest that intravenous (IV) to oral (PO) switch and short treatment durations yield similar clinical outcomes and fewer adverse events. Antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) bundled initiatives have been associated with improved clinical outcomes for bloodstream infections. METHODS: This single-center retrospective cohort evaluation included inpatient adults from 11/2014-10/2015 and 10/2017-9/2018 with GNB. The pre-ASP period was before the establishment of an ASP program. In the post period, the ASP promoted IV-to-PO switches, avoidance of repeat blood cultures, and short treatment durations for patients with uncomplicated GNB. The primary outcome was duration of antibiotic therapy. Secondary outcomes included process measures associated with the bundle and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-seven patients met criteria for inclusion, with 51 patients in the pre group and 86 patients in the post group. Background characteristics were similar between groups. The median duration of therapy (interquartile range) was 14 (10-16) days in the pre group and 10 days (7-14) in the post group (P < .001). The median day of IV-to-PO switch was day 5 (4-6) in the pre group vs day 4 (3-5) in the post group (P = .046). The average total hospital cost per case decreased by 27% in the post group (P = .19). Mortality rates and bacteremia recurrence were not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSIONS: An ASP bundle for uncomplicated GNB was associated with reduced durations of therapy and earlier PO switch. These findings highlight the synergistic role of ASPs in optimizing antibiotic use and promoting patient safety.