Outcomes of heart transplants in children with heterotaxy syndrome.

OBJECTIVES: End-stage congenital heart disease (CHD) in children with heterotaxy syndrome might necessitate a heart transplant (HTx). An HTx in heterotaxy patients can be associated with several technical (e.g. redo, systemic/pulmonary-venous/situs anomalies, pulmonary artery reconstruction) and extra-cardiac (e.g. ciliary dyskinesia, infections, gastrointestinal) challenges. Our goal was to determine if heterotaxy syndrome is associated with increased early or late transplant risks. METHODS: The United Network for Organ Sharing transplant database was merged with the Paediatric Health Information System administrative database to identify children with heterotaxy who received an HTx. Characteristics and outcomes were compared between children with heterotaxy and contemporaneous non-heterotaxy congenital and non-congenital cardiomyopathy control groups. RESULTS: After we merged the databases, we divided our cohort of 1122 patients into 3 groups: the heterotaxy (n = 143), group the non-heterotaxy congenital (n = 428) group and the cardiomyopathy (n = 551) group. There were differences in the characteristics between the 3 groups, with the heterotaxy group being comparable to the non-heterotaxy congenital group. The waiting list duration was longer for the heterotaxy than for the non-heterotaxy congenital and cardiomyopathy groups (91 vs 63 vs 56 days, P < 0.001). Early post-transplant complications were similar for all groups except for operative mortality, which was 1% for the cardiomyopathy and 4% for the heterotaxy and non-heterotaxy congenital groups (P < 0.001). The post-transplant hospital stay was shorter for the cardiomyopathy (57 days) compared to the non-heterotaxy congenital (99 days) and heterotaxy (89 days) groups (P < 0.001). Whereas rejection prior to discharge was comparable between the heterotaxy and the CHD groups, it was higher at 1 year for the heterotaxy (22%) than for the non-heterotaxy congenital (19%) and cardiomyopathy (13%) groups (P < 0.001). Survival at 5 years was superior for the cardiomyopathy (87%) compared to the heterotaxy (69%) and non-heterotaxy congenital groups (78%) (P < 0.001). For the heterotaxy group, no risk factors affecting survival were identified on multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of the complexity, an HTx in selected children with heterotaxy is associated with good mid-term outcomes. Despite early results that are comparable to those of other patients with CHD, the increasing rejection rate at 1 year and the relatively accelerated attrition at mid-term warrant further follow-up. Due to database limitations in defining morphologic and surgical details, further work is warranted to delineate anatomical and surgical variables that could affect survival.

Impact of new allocation policy on waitlist and transplant outcomes of adult congenital heart patients supported with ECMO.

BACKGROUND: The use of ECMO as a bridge to heart transplantation has been growing rapidly in all heart transplant recipients since the implementation of the new UNOS allocation policy; however, the impact on adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) patients is not known. METHODS: We analyzed the UNOS data (2015-2021) for ACHD patients supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) during the waitlist, before and after October 2018, to assess the impact on the waitlist and posttransplant outcomes. We compared the characteristics and outcomes of ACHD patients with or without ECMO use during the waitlist and pre- and postpolicy changes. RESULTS: A total of 23 821 patients underwent heart transplantation, and only 918 (4%) had ACHD. Out of all ACHD patients undergoing heart transplants, 6% of patients in the prepolicy era and 7.6% in the postpolicy era were on ECMO at the time of listing. Those on ECMO were younger and sicker compared to the rest of the ACHD cohort. Those on ECMO had similar profiles pre- and postpolicy change; however, there was a very significant decrease in the waitlist time [136 days (IQR 29-384) vs. 38 days (IQR 11-108), p = 0.01]. There was no difference in waitlist mortality; however, competing risk analyses showed a higher likelihood of transplantation (51% vs. 29%) and a lower likelihood of death or deterioration (31% vs. 42%) postpolicy change. Long-term outcomes posttransplant for those supported with ECMO compared to the non-ECMO cohort are similar for ACHD patients, although there was higher attrition in the first year for the ECMO cohort. CONCLUSION: The new allocation policy has resulted in shorter waitlist times and a higher likelihood of transplantation for ACHD patients supported by ECMO. However, the appropriate use of ECMO and the underuse of durable circulatory support devices in this population need further exploration.

Trends and outcomes of heart transplantation in adults with congenital heart disease.

OBJECTIVES: Heart transplantation for adult congenital heart disease is complicated and associated with challenging pretransplant support, long waiting and high early post-transplant mortality. We explored if surgical and medical advances and allocation system changes have affected outcomes. METHODS: From United Network for Organ Sharing database, adults with congenital heart disease listed for heart transplantation were queried. To explore practice and outcome trends, patients were divided into 4 eras (eras 1-3: nearly 3 equal periods from 1992 to 2018, era 4: after 2018, corresponding with new allocation system). Univariate and multivariable analysis was performed to evaluate outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 2737 patients were listed. There was gradual increase in listed and transplanted patients, along with significant increase in use of mechanical support, simultaneous kidney and liver transplantation. While proportion of transplanted remained constant, there was decrease in proportion delisted/died after listing (P = 0.01) and waiting list duration (P = 0.01), especially in era 4. Thirty-day post-transplant mortality remains high; however, it has significantly improved starting era 3 (P = 0.01). Current survival at 1-year and 5-years is 85% and 65%, with improvement mainly related to decreased early death. On multivariable analysis, factors associated with survival were lower glomerular filtration rate (hazard ratio = 0.99, P = 0.042), bilirubin (hazard ratio = 1.17, P<0.001) and mechanical ventilation (hazard ratio = 2.3, P=0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Heart transplantation in adults with congenital heart disease is increasing, along with added complexity, higher usage of pretransplant mechanical support and simultaneous organ transplantation. Despite that, more complex patients do not experience worse outcomes. Early mortality improved but remains high. New donor allocation system allowed shorter waiting time and higher proportion transplanted without altering early mortality.

Ambulatory Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Use in Patients Listed for Lung Transplant.

There has been an increase in the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) to bridge critically ill patients to lung transplant (LTX). This study evaluates how ambulatory status on ECMO affected waitlist and post-LTX outcomes. The United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) database was queried for patients aged of greater than or equal to 18 years and between 2016 and 2021 to identify pre-LTX patients supported by ECMO. The patients were classified in venous-arterial (VA) ECMO and veno-venous (VV) ECMO cohorts and further classified as ambulatory (AMB) and non-AMB (nAMB). Each cohort was controlled against the non-ECMO patients. Univariate statistical tests, as well as Kaplan-Meier survival curves, were used for analysis. The 90 day waitlist survival was the highest among the non-ECMO group (96%), but both AMB VV and VA groups had superior survival compared to the nAMB group (85% vs. 75%, 78% vs. 65%, p < 0.01). After adjusting for the median lung allocation score (LAS) (88) in the VV ECMO group, the waitlist survival was superior in the AMB VV ECMO compared to those not on ECMO (86% vs. 78%, p > 0.01). The 1 year post-LTX survival between non-ECMO and AMB VV ECMO was comparable (88% vs. 88%, p = 0.66). Ambulating patients or use of physical therapy while on ECMO can help improve lung transplant outcomes.

Cannula Placement for Cerebral Protection Without Circulatory Arrest in Patients Undergoing Hemiarch Aortic Aneurysm Repair.

BACKGROUND: Aortic aneurysms involving the proximal aortic arch, which require hemiarch-type repair, typically require circulatory arrest with antegrade cerebral perfusion. Left carotid antegrade cerebral perfusion (LCP) via distal arch cannulation without circulatory arrest was used in this study's patient population. The goal was to assess the operative efficiency and clinical outcomes of using a distal arch cannulation technique that would not require any hypothermic circulatory arrest (HCA) time compared with more traditional brachiocephalic artery cannulation with right-sided unilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion (RCP) and HCA. METHODS: A single-center retrospective review of patients with replacement of the distal ascending aorta involving the proximal arch was performed. Patients with an intramural hematoma or dissection were excluded. Between January 2015 and December 2019, 68 adult patients had undergone a hemiarch repair because of aneurysmal disease. Analysis of baseline demographics, operative data, and clinical outcomes was performed. RESULTS: Comparing the 68 patients: 21 patients were treated with RCP (via brachiocephalic artery graft with HCA), and 47 patients were treated with LCP (via distal aortic arch cannulation with cross-clamp between the brachiocephalic and left common carotid arteries without HCA). Baseline characteristics and outcomes were evaluated for both groups. The LCP group was younger (LCP median [IQR] age, 60 [53-65] years vs RCP median [IQR] age, 67 [59-71] years]. Sex, race, body mass index, comorbidities, and ejection fraction were similar between the groups. Cardiopulmonary bypass time (LCP, 123 minutes vs RCP, 149 minutes) and unilateral cerebral perfusion time (LCP, 17 minutes vs RCP, 22 minutes) were longer in the RCP group. Bleeding, prolonged ventilatory support, kidney failure, and length of stay were similar. In-hospital mortality was 2% in the LCP group vs 0% in the RCP group. Stroke occurred in 2 patients (4.2%) in the LCP group and in 0% of the RCP group. Mortality at 6 months in the LCP and RCP groups was 3% and 10%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Distal arch cannulation with LCP without HCA is a reasonable and safe alternative strategy for patients requiring hemiarch replacement for aneurysmal disease. This technique may provide additional benefits by avoiding circulatory arrest in these complex cases.

Associated Factors and Impact of Persistent Renal Dysfunction in Pediatric Heart Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the impact of significant renal dysfunction (SRD) on listing and pediatric heart transplantation (PHT) outcomes. METHODS: The United Network of Organ Sharing registry was queried. Our cohort included 11,625 children listed for PHT (2000-2020). At listing, 1494 (13%) had SRD, defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate of <45 mL/min/1.73 m2 and/or dialysis requirement. Characteristics of children with and without SRD were compared. SRD impact on outcomes was examined. Factors associated with waiting list mortality, persistent SRD at PHT, and post-PHT survival with and without simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation were assessed. RESULTS: Compared with children with an estimated glomerular filtration rate >45 mL/min/1.73 m2, those with SRD had higher waiting list death (37% vs 14%, P < .01) and lower transplantation rate (51% vs 71%, P < .01). On multivariable analysis, SRD was associated with waiting list death (hazard ratio, 3.016; P < .0001). Among 767 children with SRD who received PHT, 361 (47%) had persistent SRD at the time of PHT. On multivariable analysis, factors associated with persistent SRD were older age (odds ratio [OR], 1.147 per year; 95% CI, 1.046-1.258 per year; P = .0035), bilirubin (OR, 1.127 per 1-mg/dL; 95% CI, 1.061-1.197 per 1-mg/dL; P < .0001), dialysis (OR, 1.839; 95% CI, 1.017-3.326; P = .0115), mechanical ventilation (OR, 1.972; 95% CI, 1.336-2.911; P = .0006), extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (OR, 1.747; 95% CI, 1.074-2.842; P = .0247), and not using a ventricular assist device (VAD) (OR, 0.498 [VAD use]; 95% CI, 0.277-0.895 VAD use; P = .0198). Post-PHT survival was 72%, 70%, and 56% (P < .01) at 8 years for PHT alone with improved renal function, simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation (n = 69), and PHT alone with persistent SRD, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: SRD is associated with high waiting list death and decreased transplantation rate. Timely proper pre-PHT support with VAD could enhance kidney recovery. Simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation neutralized persistent SRD effect on survival and might be considered in high-risk patients such as those on dialysis, mechanical ventilation, or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support.

Predictors of Survival After Heart Transplant in the New Allocation System: A UNOS Database Analysis.

Clinical predictors of posttransplant graft loss since the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) heart allocation system change have not been well characterized. Single organ adult heart transplants from the UNOS database were identified (n = 10,252) and divided into a test cohort (n = 6,869, 67%) and validation cohort (n = 3,383, 33%). A Cox regression analysis was performed on the test cohort to identify recipient and donor risk factors for posttransplant graft loss. Based on the risk factors, a score (max 16) was developed to classify patients in the validation cohort into risk groups of low (≤1), mid (2-3), high (≥4) risk. Recipient factors of advanced age, Black race, recipient blood group O, diabetes, etiology of heart failure, renal dysfunction, elevated bilirubin, redo-transplantation, elevated pulmonary artery pressure, transplant with a durable ventricular assist device, or transplant on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) or ventilator were associated with more posttransplant graft loss. Donor factors of ischemic time and donor age were also associated with outcomes. One year graft survival for the low-, mid-, high-risk groups was 94%, 91%, and 85%, respectively. In conclusion, easily obtainable clinical characteristics at time of heart transplant can predict posttransplant outcomes in the current era.

Perioperative Morbidity and Outcomes in Pediatric Patients Transitioned From Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation to Ventricular Assist Device Support: A Study of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Congenital Heart Surgery Database.

As a bridge to transplant strategy, children transitioned from extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) to ventricular assist device (VAD) have higher waitlist mortality compared with those who receive de novo VAD. However, the contribution of the immediate perioperative period and differences in the two groups are not well studied. We performed a nested case-control study between children receiving de novo VAD (group 1) and those transitioned from ECMO to VAD (group 2) between 2014 and 2019 using The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) database. A total of 735 children underwent VAD placement with 498 in group 1 and 237 in group 2. Patients in group 2 were significantly younger, smaller, and significantly sicker, were twice as likely to transition to biventricular VAD and need unplanned reoperations. Overall mortality was 16% for group 1 and 34% for group 2 ( p < 0.01). Regression analysis showed that ECMO use (odds ratio [OR], 2.17 [1.3-3.4]), ventilator need (OR, 2.2 [1.3-3.9]), and cardiogenic shock (OR, 1.8 [1.2-2.8]) were all independent preoperative predictors of VAD mortality while dialysis need (OR, 25.5 [8.6-75.3]), stroke (OR, 6.2 [3.1-12.6]), and bleeding (OR, 1.9 [1.1-3.4]) were independent postoperative predictors of VAD mortality within 30 days (all p < 0.05). The study demonstrated significant baseline differences between the two cohorts, warranting avoidance of comparison. Early elective VAD placement in this cohort of patients should be sought to avoid interim ECMO and high post-VAD mortality.

Increasing donor-recipient weight mismatch in infant heart transplantation is associated with shorter waitlist duration and no increased morbidity or mortality.

OBJECTIVES: Infants awaiting paediatric heart transplantation (PHT) experience long waitlist duration and high mortality due to donor shortage. Using the United Network for Organ Sharing database, we explored if increasing donor-recipient weight ratio (DRWR) >2.0 (recommended cutoff) was associated with adverse outcomes. METHODS: Between 2007 and 2020, 1392 infants received PHT. We divided cohort into 3 groups: A (DRWR ≤1.0, n = 239, 17%), B (DRWR 1.0-2.0, n = 947, 68%), C (DRWR >2.0, n = 206, 15%). Group characteristics and PHT outcomes were analysed. RESULTS: DRWR ranged between 0.5 and 4.1. Underlying pathology (congenital versus cardiomyopathy), gender, race, renal function and mechanical circulatory support were comparable between groups. Group C patients were more likely to be ventilated, to receive ABO blood group (ABO)-incompatible heart and to have longer donor ischaemic time. Waitlist duration was significantly shorter for group C (33 vs 50 days, P < 0.1). Early outcomes for groups A, B and C were the following (respectively): operative death (6%, 4%, 3%, P = 0.29), primary graft dysfunction (5%, 3%, 3%, P = 0.30), renal failure (10%, 7%, 7%, P = 0.42) and stroke (3%, 4%, 1%, P = 0.36). The DRWR group was not associated with operative death in either congenital (odds ratio (OR) = 0.819, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.523-1.282) or cardiomyopathy (OR = 1.221, 95% CI = 0.780-1.912) patients and only significant factor was pre-PHT extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (OR = 4.400, 95% CI = 2.761-7.010). Additionally, survival at 1 year (87%, 87%, 85%, P = 0.80) and 5 years (76%, 78%, 77%, P = 0.80) was comparable between the DRWR groups. CONCLUSIONS: Infants who received PHT with DRWR >2.0, up to 4.1, experienced shorter waitlist duration with no demonstrable increase in peri-transplant complications, operative or late mortality. Historic practice to avoid DRWR > 2.0 due to complications (e.g. hypertension-related stroke, graft dysfunction, death) is not currently supported in infants and stretching DRWR acceptance criteria would decrease PHT waitlist duration and potentially improve waitlist complications and mortality.

Identification of risk factors and prediction models for secondary malignant neoplasms (SMNs)-free survival and SMNs-specific survival in testicular cancer survivors.

OBJECTIVE: This research endeavored to determine the key demographic and pathological factors tied to secondary malignant neoplasms (SMNs) in survivors of testicular cancer and to develop a predictive model. METHOD: A total of 53,309 testicular cancer patients from the SEER national database (1975-2016) were included in our analysis. The primary outcome measured was SMNs-free survival, defined as the duration from testicular cancer diagnosis to the detection of a non-testicular malignancy. The secondary outcome was SMN-specific survival, defined as the period from testicular cancer diagnosis until the patient's death due to SMNs. FINDINGS: Of the patients in the SEER cohort, 2978 (5.6%) developed non-testicular cancer SMNs. Higher age, receipt of chemotherapy, and radiation treatment were all significantly associated with the development of SMNs in survivors of testicular cancer (all p < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a worse SMNs-free survival and poor SMN-specific survival in patients who underwent radiation therapy (both p < 0.001). Multivariable Cox regression analysis found non-Hispanic Black ethnicity, higher age, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy to be significantly associated with worse SMNs-free survival (p = 0.002, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively), while lymphoma histology was associated with better SMNs-free survival (p < 0.001). The most common SMN types in patients receiving radiation therapy were prostate, lung, and bladder cancers. Predictive nomograms for SMNs-free survival and SMNs-specific survival were developed, with a C-index of 0.776 and 0.824, respectively. CONCLUSION: The age of diagnosis, non-Hispanic Black ethnicity, lymphoma histology, and treatment history with chemotherapy and radiation therapy were identified as prognostic factors for SMNs-free survival.

Durable left ventricular assist device implant-how I teach it.

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have become a mainstay of advanced heart failure therapy. The technical aspects of performing a device implant are nuanced and attention to these details allows for successful therapy with good outcomes. As more patient with heart failure are expected to benefit from mechanical circulatory support, the need for a concise and consistent technique for LVAD implantation is needed. Teaching this procedure is most comprehensible when broken down into separate steps, as with many other procedures. Here, we describe our standard protocol for LVAD implantation, as well as rudimentary outcomes of 6-year experience in our center. We hope this will provide some insight and guidance to centers who are expanding into the field of mechanical circulatory support and can help them form a foundation with which to build their own experience and success.

Venous External Support in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Neointimal hyperplasia and lumen irregularities are major contributors to vein graft failure and the use of VEST(R) should prevent this. In this review, we aim to evaluate the angiographic outcomes of externally supported vein grafts. Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library were systematically reviewed for randomized clinical trials published by August 2022. The primary outcome was graft failure. Secondary outcomes included graft ectasia, intimal hyperplasia area and thickness, and graft nonuniformity. Odds ratios (OR) for dichotomous variables and mean difference (MD) for continuous variables with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled using a fixed-effects model. Three randomized controlled trials with a total of 437 patients were included with follow-up ranging from 1 to 2 years. The odds of graft failure were similar in the 2 groups (OR 1.22; 95%CI 0.88-1.71; I²â€¯= 0%). Intimal hyperplasia area [MD -0.77 mm2; 95%CI -1.10 to -0.45; I2 = 0%] and thickness [MD -0.06 mm; 95% CI -0.08 to -0.04; I2=0%] were significantly lower in the VEST group. Fitzgibbon Patency Scale of II or III (representing angiographic conduit nonuniformity; OR 0.67; 95%CI 0.48-0.94; I2 = 0%) and graft ectasia (OR 0.53; 95%CI 0.32-0.88; I2 = 33%) were also significantly lower in the VEST group. At short-term follow-up, VEST does not seem to reduce the incidence of graft failure, although it is associated with attenuation of intimal hyperplasia and nonuniformity. Longer angiographic follow-up is warranted to determine whether these positive effects might translate into a positive effect in graft failure and in long-term clinical outcomes.

Influence of Body Mass Index in Donor-Recipient Size Mismatch in Pediatric Heart Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Body weight is the traditional metric for matching donor and recipient size for pediatric heart transplantation (pHT). We hypothesized that mismatch in body mass index (BMI) or body surface area (BSA) rather than weight is better associated with outcomes of transplantation and therefore should be used for donor-recipient size matching. METHODS: Analysis of the United Network for Organ Sharing database limited to pHT recipients was performed. Donor and recipient mismatch groups were created for weight, BMI, and BSA ratios. Differences in recipient characteristics between each cohort and the impact of mismatch on outcomes were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 4,465 patients were included in the analysis of which 43% had congenital heart disease (CHD). There were significant differences in patient characteristics by matching, independent of the matching parameter. Multivariable regression analysis showed that a low donor-recipient BMI ratio (compared to normal) (CHD OR 1.70; non-CHD 2.78) was a predictor of one-year mortality (all P < .001) in both CHD and non-CHD cohorts. Low BMI ratio was also associated with worse long-term survival in non-CHD groups, but not in the CHD cohort. Weight and BSA ratio did not predict one year or long-term survival. CONCLUSION: The use of low BMI donors compared to recipient may predict poor early and long-term survival and therefore should be avoided in pHT. The use of BMI matching may improve donor-recipient matching in pHT.

Meta-Analysis on the Impact of Ventricular Arrhythmias on Mortality in Patients With Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

Patients with continuous flow left ventricular assist devices (CFLVADs) have an increased risk of ventricular arrhythmias (VA), but the impact of VA on survival is unclear. A systematic search of electronic databases was conducted to identify studies that reported the impact of VA on all-cause mortality and right ventricular failure (RVF) in patients with CFLVAD. The Mantel-Haenszel method was used to calculate the 95% confidence interval (CI) and pooled risk ratio (RR) with a random-effects model. A total of 19 observational studies with 4,544 patients and a median follow-up of 18.5 months (interquartile range 11.5 to 26.4) were included. There was statistically significantly higher mortality in patients with any VA than in those with no VA after CFLVAD implantation (RR 1.33, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.75, p = 0.04, I2 = 78%). On sensitivity analysis, after removing the largest study by Rehorn et al,10 the association between overall mortality and VA was lost, suggesting that these results should be interpreted with caution. Early VA developing within 30 days after implantation was associated with a higher risk of mortality (RR 1.37, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.63, p <0.01, I2 = 52%), whereas late VA developing after 30 days after CFLVAD implantation was not associated with any significant difference in mortality (RR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.80 to 1.24; p = 0.98, I2 = 35%). In addition, there was a statistically significant higher risk of RVF in patients with VA than in those with no VA (RR 1.58, 95% CI 1.20 to 2.08, p <0.01, I2 = 0%). In conclusion, in patients with CFLVAD, the development of any VA was associated with a 33% higher risk of all-cause mortality. Early VA developing within 30 days after implantation was significantly associated with a higher risk of mortality, whereas late VA was not associated with mortality. VA after left ventricular assist device was significantly associated with a higher risk of developing RVF.

Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Is Associated with Superior Survival Compared to Open Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) has not been associated with a long-term survival advantage compared to open esophagectomy (OE). We investigated survival differences between MIE, including laparoscopic and robotic, and OE. METHODS: Patients undergoing esophagectomy from 2010 to 2014 with T1-4N0-3M0, adenocarcinoma or squamous cell histology, in middle or lower esophagus were queried from the National Cancer Database and stratified into groups based on their surgical procedure: robotic, laparoscopic, or OE. Propensity matching (1:1) was done between robotic and laparoscopic to produce an MIE group. The MIE group was matched to OE yielding a 1:1:2 matching of robotic:laparoscopic:OE. Postoperative outcomes and survival (Kaplan-Meier) were compared between groups. RESULTS: Prior to matching, 7,163 patients met inclusion criteria and a greater portion underwent OE (67.7%) than MIE (laparoscopic 24.9% and robotic 7.4%). Matching yielded similar groups (robotic = 527, laparoscopic = 527, and OE =1054). Compared to OE, MIE patients had a significantly greater number of nodes sampled and trended toward increased R0 resections (96.1% vs 94.3%, P = .053). OE was associated with a longer median postoperative stay (10 vs 9 days, P = .001). Mortality at 30 and 90 days was similar. However, postoperative survival for MIE was significantly greater than OE (P < .001). No survival difference existed between robotic and laparoscopic (P = .723). CONCLUSIONS: MIE is associated with increased number of nodes examined and a shorter postoperative length of stay. After propensity matching, patients undergoing MIE had better long but not short-term survival than OE. This benefit seems to be independent of the use of robotic technology.