Three-Dimensional Isotropic MRI of the Cervical Spine: A Diagnostic Comparison With Conventional MRI.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective diagnostic trial. OBJECTIVE: To determine the diagnostic performance of 3-dimensional turbo spin-echo (3D-TSE) isotropic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the assessment of cervical spine pathology. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: MRI is the imaging modality of choice for many cervical spine pathologies. However, axial imaging may be suboptimal if the image plane is oriented differently than the plane of interest, due to lordosis, kyphosis, or deformity. 3D-TSE isotropic MRI is a promising novel technology that bypasses this limitation by enabling dynamic image reformation in any desired orientation. METHODS: Forty-eight patients who underwent 3D-TSE and conventional 2-dimensional fast spin-echo (2D-FSE) T2-weighted cervical spine MRI at our institution were randomly selected. 3D-TSE and 2D-FSE sequences from each subject were independently evaluated by 2 orthopedic spine surgeons and 4 musculoskeletal radiologists. Images were assessed using specific pilot-tested criteria for stenosis, herniation, and degenerative changes. Intermethod, interrater, and intrarater agreements for 3D-TSE and 2D-FSE, and Fleiss κ coefficients were determined. RESULTS: The overall intermethod agreement was 80.7%. The interrater agreement was 75.9% for 3D-TSE and 75.7% for 2D-FSE (P=0.47). The intrarater agreement was 82.2% for 3D-TSE and 81.5% for 2D-FSE (P=0.71). Fleiss κ coefficients were 0.42 for 3D-TSE and 0.43 for 2D-FSE (P=0.62), indicating moderate interrater reliability. The intermethod agreement and the 2D-FSE intrarater agreement were statistically similar (P=0.49). CONCLUSIONS: There is a high degree of agreement between 3D-TSE and 2D-FSE MRI in assessing the cervical spine. The intermethod variability was statistically similar to the intrinsic intrarater variability of 2D-FSE MRI. This study demonstrates that 3D-TSE yields at least equivalent diagnostic information as conventional 2D-FSE in the cervical spine. In addition, reviewers noted subjective advantages of 3D-TSE image reprocessing, especially when evaluating greater pathology or deformity, with a simplified image acquisition process.

Comparison of agreement of cervical spine degenerative pathology findings in magnetic resonance imaging studies.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is often used in the evaluation of degenerative conditions of the cervical spine. However, the agreement of interpreting and reporting varying degenerative findings on cervical MRI has not been well assessed. PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the inter-rater and intra-rater agreement of MRI findings between common degenerative findings of the cervical spine. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective diagnostic study was used as study design. PATIENT SAMPLE: The sample consisted of 48 patients who underwent routine cervical spine MRI at our institution between January 2011 and June 2012. OUTCOME MEASURES: Reviewers evaluated each MRI study at each vertebral level for disc hydration, disc space height, central stenosis, foraminal stenosis, end plate changes, spondylolisthesis, and cord signal change. METHODS: A panel of two orthopedic spine surgeons and four musculoskeletal radiologists independently reviewed 48 sets of T2-weighted axial and sagittal MRI sequences for a series of preselected criteria, and their findings were compared with those of the other panelists to determine inter-rater agreement. Each panelist also re-reviewed the first 10 studies to determine intra-rater agreement. Absolute inter-rater and intra-rater agreements were then calculated and compared for different findings. A modified analysis ignored disagreements between the least severe grades of findings to determine the inter-rater and intra-rater agreements of the most clinically important severity grades. RESULTS: Absolute inter-rater agreement ranged from 54.6% to 95.0%. Disc hydration (54.6%), central stenosis (72.7%), and foraminal stenosis (73.1%) demonstrated the lowest inter-rater agreement, whereas spondylolisthesis (95.0%) and cord signal change (92.9%) demonstrated the highest agreement. The modified analysis found better inter-rater agreement, ranging from 80.9% to 95.0%. Absolute intra-rater agreement ranged from 74.2% to 94.7%. The modified analysis again found better agreement, ranging from 85.0% to 94.7%. As would be expected, overall intra-rater agreement (81.6%, 95% CI 78.9%-84.3%) was higher than inter-rater agreement (75.7%, 95% CI 74.4%-77.0%). The clinical specialty of the reviewer had no significant impact on inter- or intra-rater agreement. CONCLUSIONS: MRI findings play an important role in the management of patients with cervical spine conditions. For this reason, consistent descriptions of these findings are essential and physicians should be aware of the relative reliability of these findings. This systematic study developed standardized grading criteria and nomenclature for common clinically significant MRI findings in the cervical spine. Even in this optimized research setting, we found significant ranges in agreement across these MRI findings. In the clinical setting, inter- and intra-rater agreements may be lower, and the range of agreements between findings may be greater. Physicians should be aware of inconsistencies inherent in the interpretation of cervical MRI findings and should be aware that some findings demonstrate lower agreement than others.

Study of two techniques for midline laparotomy fascial wound closure.

To study the results of two techniques, simple interrupted closure and continuous with intermittent Aberdeen knot technique for midline laparotomy fascial wound closure. A random selection of 200 midline laparotomy cases was done. In one group (group A) of 100 cases, midline fascial wound closure was done with continuous sutures with intermittent Aberdeen knot technique using Prolene No. 1 suture material. In the other group (group B) of 100 cases, closure was done with the technique of simple interrupted sutures with Prolene No.1 suture material. Comparison of both the techniques regarding preoperative status and postoperative complication such as incisional hernia, wound dehiscence, suture sinus formation, stitch granuloma, and chronic wound pain was done according to clinical examination and recorded in the pro forma prepared. In group A, postoperative complications were incisional hernia 3 %, wound dehiscence 4 %, and suture sinus formation 1 %. In group B, postoperative complication were incisional hernia 5 %, wound dehiscence 4 %, and suture sinus formation 1 %. All these complications were statistically insignificant, in both group comparisons. While the complication such as stitch granuloma 3 %, chronic wound pain 3 %, and wound infection 4 % in group A was significantly less than in group B where the complication of stitch granuloma was 12 %, chronic wound pain 13 %, and wound infection 13 % (P value 0.03, P value 0.018, and P value 0.048, respectively). Both the techniques, simple interrupted suture closure and continuous with intermittent Aberdeen knot closure for midline laparotomy fascial wounds, show a similar rate of postoperative complication such as incisional hernia, wound dehiscence, and suture sinus formation. But the continuous suturing with intermittent Aberdeen knot technique is a better option to prevent complications such as stitch granuloma, chronic wound pain, and wound infection, which are higher in the simple interrupted fascial wound closure technique.