The role of ultrasound and FDG-PET/CT to detect extracranial artery involvement in patients with suspected large vessel vasculitis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the accuracy of ultrasound (US) versus fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) to identify extracranial involvement in large vessel vasculitis (LVV). METHODS: A retrospective observational study of patients with suspected LVV. All patients underwent US exam within 24 h per protocol. FDG-PET/CT was performed according to clinician criteria. The gold standard for LVV diagnosis was clinical confirmation after 6 months. RESULTS: Of the 113 patients included (74.3% female, mean age 74 years), 37 (32.7%) were diagnosed with LVV after 6 months. The sensitivity and specificity of US were 86.5% and 96.1%, respectively. Only 12 (42.9%) of 28 patients undergoing a FDG-PET/CT per clinician criteria showed positive findings. The sensitivity and specificity of FDG-PET/CT for LVV were 61.1% and 90%, respectively. Taking FDG-PET/CT as the reference, US showed extracranial inflammation in 10/12 (83.3%) and detected 2 (12.5%) additional cases of extracranial involvement with negative FDG-PET/CT. Conversely, FDG-PET/CT was positive in two patients with negative US (one isolated aortitis and one aortoiliac involvement). CONCLUSIONS: US and FDG-PET/CT are both valid tools to detect extracranial involvement. The presence of US extracranial artery inflammation is consistent with FDG-PET/CT examination, although a negative US scan does not rule out extracranial involvement.

The Importance of Outcome Measures in the Management of Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases.

Rheumatic inflammatory diseases include a diverse and heterogeneous group of multifaceted disorders in which clinical history and physical examination are essential to make treatment choices and for optimizing outcomes. Composite outcome measures have become very relevant in rheumatology to evaluate disease activity as they capture the most important dimensions of the disease into one single measure. Most outcome measures may include disease manifestations, laboratory data, physician examination as well as the patient perspective as different outcome dimensions of the disease into a simple index. These outcome measures have proved their utility for guiding treatment in treat-to- target strategies and personalized medicine, with remission being the ultimate goal. In this narrative review, we go over the most commonly used outcome measures in rheumatoid arthritis, spondyloarthropathies, including psoriatic arthritis, and systemic lupus erythematosus to provide a practical summary for clinicians for everyday routine care.

Clinical impact of confinement due to the COVID-19 pandemic on patients with fibromyalgia: a cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: To our knowledge, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on fibromyalgia (FM) patients has not been studied before. FM patients often experience clinical impairment with stress. The aim of this study was to determine whether severity of FM increases because of confinement by the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: This prospective study includes patients from the Combined Index of Severity of Fibromyalgia (ICAF) cohort who met the 2010 ACR FM criteria. In this cohort, all patients have a periodical evaluation of their quality of life through two questionnaires, the ICAF, which assesses the ability to perform daily living activities, anxiety and depression, and through the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), which assesses overall change after a therapeutical intervention. Pre- and post-confinement measurements were analysed. Inferential statistical analysis and ANOVA for repeated measurements were used. RESULTS: A total of 93 patients received a phone consultation, (95.5% females), mean (SD) age of 48.23 (8.38) years. Four patients were excluded as presenting COVID-19 and 51 (57%) completed the post-confinement ICAF. Following confinement, 25 (49%) patients got worse (group-worse) and 26 (51%) patients experienced no change or improved (group-stable). Comparisons between pre- and post-confinement ICAF did not show significant differences in both groups. Passive coping was significantly different in group-worse in pre-confinement evaluation. In the 80% of patients with passive coping predominance there were no changes in coping strategy. CONCLUSIONS: No clinical impairment due to COVID-19 confinement occurred. The perceived worsening among FM patients relies primarily on how patients cope with their disease, without a real impact on clinical manifestations.