Pain Intensity Scales Comparison in Patient with Abdominal Pain.

BACKGROUND: The aim of study was to explore efficiency of the pain rating scales on patients experiencing abdominal pain, determine correlation between the scales and their applicability to general population and determine the minimal clinical important difference in mm on the VAS as discriminatory for difference in pain intensity. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The study was performed at the Emergency Department of the University Clinical Hospital of Mostar on patients with abdominal pain which started less than 24 hours before, excluding patients under 16 years old, uncooperative patients and those with altered state of consciousness. The sample data were collected from February to May 2010. Hundred patients completed the questionnaire. Two patients, admitted to the Abdominal Surgery Department, were excluded. The patients were asked to sign the informed consent form and assess the level of pain on three scales (VAS, NRS, VRS). RESULTS: The NRS showed a significant difference in assessing the pain intensity in the observed time. By lapse of time, the patients were reporting lower pain intensity (P=0.017). VAS and NRS had high correlation coefficient values, indicating strong correlation and credibility. The NRS showed strong results correlation (r=0.784; P<0.001). Inter-scale correlation was growing over time. Correlation between VAS and NRS was very strong, the strongest in the last measurement (r=0.950; P<0.001). The NRS correlation with VRS (r=0.430; P<0.001) was slightly better than with VAS (r=0.402; P<0.001). The NRS proved to be the most sensitive to changes in pain intensity (SRM=0.305), whereas the VRS showed extremely low responsiveness (SRM=0.185). CONCLUSION: Having proved as the most useful, reliable and efficient pain assessment instrument, the NRS is hereby recommended as method of pain objectification and determining changes in pain intensity.

Attitudes of Students of Medicine, University of Mostar According to Induced Abortion.

BACKGROUND: Aim of this study was to establish attitudes of medical students on induced abortion and connection of those attitudes with religiousness, length of their studies, sex and various circumstances of pregnancy. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In total, 148 students of the first, second, fifth and sixth year of medical faculty participated in the research. The study was conducted at the Medical Faculty of the University in Mostar. While collecting the data, we used a survey taken over from literature. The data were tested with adequate statistical methods afterwards. RESULTS: 81.1% of students would perform an abortion under certain circumstances (χ2=57.189; P<0.001). Most students answered that they would perform an abortion in case that a fetus had malformations (χ2=3.892; P=0.49) or if the mother's life were endangered (χ2=47.676; P<0.001). By comparison of students' readiness to perform an abortion under various circumstances of pregnancy depending on length of medical education, statistically significant difference was proved in the following circumstances: rape (χ2=6.097; P=0.014) and if the pregnancy would endanger mother's mental health (χ2=4.488; P=0.034). Students with shorter medical education expressed more liberal attitudes in the above stated circumstances. By comparison of students' readiness to perform an abortion under various circumstances of pregnancy depending on religiousness statistically significant difference was proved in the following circumstances: in case of 'abortion on demand', no matter the reason (χ2=11.908; P=0.012), teenage pregnancy (χ2=33.308; P<0.001) and if the pregnancy would interfere with mother's career χ2=35.897; P<0.001). Unreligious students expressed more liberal attitudes. CONCLUSION: Influence of length of medical education and sex on attitudes on abortion was not proved statistically. Impact of religiousness on that attitude cannot be commented due to very small share of unreligious students in the sample.

Accuracy of Modified Alvarado Score, Eskelinen Score and Ohmann Score in Diagnosing Acute Appendicitis.

INTRODUCTION: By processing the data of a large number of patients with abdominal pain, diagnostic scores whose implementation attempts to facilitate acute appendicitis diagnostics were developed. Modified Alvarado score, Ohmann score and Eskelinen score are used as assistance when setting the diagnosis and making a decision to undertake surgery. AIM: To assess accuracy of Alvarado score, Ohmann score and Eskelinen score in diagnosing acute appendicitis and to establish connection of total score of these scoring systems with histopathological degree of appendicitis. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted at the Department of Surgery of University Clinical Hospital Mostar. The study included 70 patients who underwent appendectomy and were scored before surgery. All tested persons were examined by experienced surgeon who took anamnesis, physical status and ordered laboratory diagnostic tests. Appendicitis was excluded or confirmed by means of histopathological diagnostics, and the degree of appendicitis was determined. RESULTS: According to accuracy parameters (sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive value), the score which was of highest value was Ohmann score, followed by Eskelinen score, while the lowest value was the one of modified Alvarado score. Total score in all three scoring systems follows the degree of appendicitis, but statistical significance was proven only for Ohmann and Eskelinen scores. CONCLUSION: Ohmann and Eskelinen scores can be useful in diagnosing acute appendicitis, predicting the degree of appendicitis, as well as assistance when making decision to undertake an operative procedure. Modified Alvarado score in our subjects did not prove sufficient value. Diagnostics of acute appendicitis still must be led by contemporary algorithms in which diagnostic scoring is implemented.

Comparison of results of surgical treatments of primary inguinal hernia with flat polypropylene mesh and three-dimensional prolene (Phs) mesh--one year follow up.

The aim of this study was to compare the results of the surgery of inguinal hernias using flat polypropylene mesh and three-dimensional prolene (PHS) mesh. The study included two groups of 40 male patients, aged 18-50 years, with the diagnosis of inguinal hernia. One group was operated with a flat polypropylene mesh, while the second group was operated with three-dimensional prolene (PHS) mesh. The study has shown that the operation with three-dimensional prolene mesh lasted 15 minutes longer and that the patients had stronger inflammatory response. Statistically, there was no significant difference in post-operative pain intensity, post-operative use of analgesics, length of hospitalization, return to daily activities, early and late post-operative complications. No recurrence was registered in any of the groups. The analysis of results indicates that there is no difference in treatment of inguinal hernia with flat polypropylene and three-dimensional prolene (PHS) mesh.

Quality of life after colorectal cancer surgery in patients from University Clinical Hospital Mostar, Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Quality of life (QoL) has become an important outcome measure for patients with cancer, but results from population-based studies are infrequently published. The objective of this study was to asses QoL in patients who underwent the colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery and to compare it to the QoL of general population. The patients who were admitted from January 2004 until May 2006 at the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery at the Clinical Hospital Mostar, Bosnia and Herzegovina were divided in three groups: group of CRC patients who had received surgery and as a result of surgical treatment have colostomy, group of CRC patients who had received surgery in the same period and don't have colostomy and the third group that consisted of controls. QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR38 questionnaires by the European Organization for Cancer Research and Treatment (EORTC) were used. A total of 67 patients were included in this study, supplemented by the thirty healthy examinees. Healthy group had significantly better results in physical functioning compared with colorectal cancer patients and better results in cognitive and social functioning. Also, they reported symptoms of diarrhea and constipation less frequently than the group with colostomy and. The group with colostomy had poorer results in emotional functioning than the group without colostomy, and also reported significantly poorer results for domain "body image". Healthy group showed better results in sexual enjoinment than the patient with colorectal cancer. Patients without colostomy reported more micturition and defecation problems and female sexual problems compared to the healthy group. Generally we found that healthy population had better results than the CRC patients, while the patients with stoma had worse results than the nonstoma patients. The results presented here suggest that psychological treatment should be an integral part of the CRC treatment plan.