Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair ; 23(3): 281-6, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18955513

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Sitting balance and the ability to perform selective trunk movements are important predictors of functional outcome after stroke. However, studies evaluating the effect of exercises aimed at improving trunk performance are sparse. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of additional trunk exercises on trunk performance after stroke. METHODS: An assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial was carried out at an inpatient stroke rehabilitation center. In total 33 participants were assigned to an experimental group (n = 17) or a control group (n = 16). In addition to conventional therapy, the experimental group received 10 hours of individual and supervised trunk exercises; 30 minutes, 4 times a week, for 5 weeks. Trunk performance was evaluated by the Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS) and its subscales of static and dynamic sitting balance and coordination. A general linear repeated measures model was used to analyze the results of our study. RESULTS: No significant differences were found pretreatment between the 2 groups for the collected demographic variables, stroke-related parameters, clinical measures, number of therapy sessions received, and primary outcome measure used. Posttreatment, a significantly better improvement was noted in the experimental group compared to the control group for the dynamic sitting balance subscale only; measuring selective lateral flexion initiated from the upper and lower part of the trunk, (P = .002, post hoc power calculation = .90, effect size = 1.16). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that, in addition to conventional therapy, trunk exercises aimed at improving sitting balance and selective trunk movements have a beneficial effect on the selective performance of lateral flexion of the trunk after stroke.


Subject(s)
Exercise Therapy/methods , Movement Disorders/rehabilitation , Postural Balance/physiology , Stroke Rehabilitation , Aged , Disability Evaluation , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Movement/physiology , Movement Disorders/etiology , Movement Disorders/physiopathology , Muscle Contraction/physiology , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Physical Fitness/physiology , Pilot Projects , Stroke/physiopathology , Treatment Outcome
2.
Clin Rehabil ; 20(5): 451-8, 2006 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16774097

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate trunk performance in non-acute and chronic stroke patients by means of the Trunk Control Test and Trunk Impairment Scale and to compare the Trunk Control Test with the Trunk Impairment Scale and its subscales in relation to balance, gait and functional ability after stroke. SUBJECTS: Fifty-one stroke patients, attending a rehabilitation programme, participated in the study. MAIN MEASURES: SUBJECTS were evaluated with the Trunk Control Test, Trunk Impairment Scale, Tnetti balance and gait subscales, Functional Ambulation Category, 10-m walk test, Timed Up and Go Test and motor part of the Functional Independence Measure. RESULTS: Participants obtained a median score of 61 out of 100 on the Trunk Control Test and 11 out of 23 for the Trunk Impairment Scale. Twelve participants (24%) obtained the maximum score on the Trunk Control Test; no subject reached the maximum score on the Trunk Impairment Scale. Measures of trunk performance were significantly related with values of balance, gait and functional ability. Multivariate linear regression analysis showed an additional, significant contribution of the dynamic sitting balance subscale of the Trunk Impairment Scale in addition to the Trunk Control Test total score for measures of gait and functional ability (model R2 = 0.55-0.62). CONCLUSIONS: This study clearly indicates that trunk performance is still impaired in non-acute and chronic stroke patients. When planning future follow-up studies, use of the Trunk Impairment Scale has the advantage that it has no ceiling effect.


Subject(s)
Abdomen/physiopathology , Stroke/physiopathology , Thorax/physiopathology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Exercise Test , Female , Gait/physiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Motor Activity/physiology , Postural Balance/physiology , Recovery of Function/physiology , Stroke Rehabilitation , Task Performance and Analysis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...