El papel de la resonancia magnética multiparamétrica en el diagnóstico de la recidiva local tras la prostatectomía radical y antes de la radioterapia de rescate / The role of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of local recurrence after radical prostatectomy and before salvage radiotherapy

Objetivo Evaluar la precisión diagnóstica de la resonancia magnética multiparamétrica (RMmp) en la detección de la recidiva local del cáncer de próstata (CaP) después de la prostatectomía radical (PR) y antes de la radioterapia (RT). Materiales y métodos Un total de 188 pacientes se sometieron a una RMmp de 1,5T después de la PR y antes de la RT. Los pacientes se dividieron en 2 grupos: con recidiva bioquímica (grupo A) y sin recidiva bioquímica, pero con alto riesgo de recidiva local (grupo B). Las variables continuas se compararon entre los 2 grupos mediante la prueba t de Student; las variables categóricas se analizaron mediante chi-cuadrado de Pearson. El análisis ROC se realizó considerando como variables de agrupación el PSA antes de la RT, el grado ISUP, el pT y el pN. Resultados La recidiva del CaP (reducción de los niveles de PSA después de la RT) fue del 89,8% en el grupo A y del 80,3% en el grupo B. Al comparar los pacientes con y sin recidiva del CaP, hubo una diferencia significativa en los valores de PSA antes de la RT para el grupo A, y en los valores de PSA antes y después de la RT para el grupo B. En el grupo A hubo una correlación significativa entre el PSA antes de la RT y el diámetro de la recidiva, y entre el PSA antes de la RT y el tiempo transcurrido hasta la recidiva. La precisión diagnóstica de la RMmp en la detección de la recidiva local del CaP tras la RT es del 62,2% en el grupo A y del 38% en el grupo B. La imagen potenciada en difusión es la secuencia de RM más específica y la perfusión dinámica con contraste la más sensible. Para el PSA=0,5ng/ml, el AUC disminuye, mientras que la sensibilidad y la precisión aumentan para cada secuencia de RM. Para el PSA=0,9ng/ml, el AUC de la perfusión dinámica con contraste aumenta significativamente (AU)

Purpose Assess multiparametric-MRI (mp-MRI) diagnostic accuracy in the detection of local recurrence of prostate cancer (PCa) after radical prostatectomy (PR) and before radiation therapy (RT). Materials and methods A total of 188 patients underwent 1.5-T mp-MRI after RP before RT. Patients were divided into 2 groups: with biochemical recurrence (group A) and without but with high risk of local recurrence (group B). Continuous variables were compared between 2 groups using Student-t test; categoric variables were analyzed using Pearson chi-square. ROC analysis was performed considering PSA before RT, ISUP, pT and pN as grouping variables. Results PCa recurrence (reduction of PSA levels after RT) was 89.8% in group A and 80.3% in group B. Comparing patients with and without PCa recurrence, there was a significant difference in PSA values before RT for group A and for PSA values before RT and after RT for group B. In group A, there was a significant correlation between PSA before RT and diameter of recurrence and between PSA before RT and time spent before recurrence. The mp-MRI diagnostic accuracy in detecting PCa local recurrence after RP is of 62.2% in group A and 38% in group B. Diffusion weighted imaging is the most specific MRI-sequence and dynamic contrast enhanced the most sensitive. For PSA=0.5ng/ml, the AUC decreases while sensitivity and accuracy increase for each MRI-sequence. For PSA=0.9ng/ml, dynamic contrast enhanced-AUC increases significantly. Conclusion mp-MRI should always be performed before RT when a recurrence is suspected. New scenarios can be opened considering the role of diffusion weighted imaging for PSA≤0.5ng/ml (AU)

Postoperative radiotherapy after upfront radical prostatectomy: debated issues at a turning point-a survey exploring management trends on behalf of AIRO (Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology)

Objectives Postoperative prostate cancer patients are a heterogeneous population, and many prognostic factors (e.g., local staging, PSA kinetics, margin status, histopathological features) may influence their clinical management. In this complex scenario, univocal recommendations are often lacking. For these reasons, the present survey was developed by the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) to collect the opinion of Italian radiation oncologists and delineate a representation of current clinical practice in our country. Methods A questionnaire was administered online to AIRO (Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology) members registered in 2020 with a clinical interest in uro-oncological disease. Results Sixty-one per cent of AIRO members answered the proposed survey. Explored topics included career and expertise, indications to adjuvant RT, additional imaging in biochemical recurrence setting, use of salvage radiotherapy (SRT), management of clinically evident locoregional recurrence and future considerations. Conclusions Overall, good level of agreement was found between participants for most of the topics. Most debated issues regarded, as expected, implementation of new imaging methods in this setting. Notably, trend in favour of early SRT vs. immediate adjuvant RT was underlined, and preference for global evaluation rather than isolated risk factors for RT indications was noticed (AU)

Postoperative radiotherapy after upfront radical prostatectomy: debated issues at a turning point-a survey exploring management trends on behalf of AIRO (Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology).

OBJECTIVES: Postoperative prostate cancer patients are a heterogeneous population, and many prognostic factors (e.g., local staging, PSA kinetics, margin status, histopathological features) may influence their clinical management. In this complex scenario, univocal recommendations are often lacking. For these reasons, the present survey was developed by the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) to collect the opinion of Italian radiation oncologists and delineate a representation of current clinical practice in our country. METHODS: A questionnaire was administered online to AIRO (Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology) members registered in 2020 with a clinical interest in uro-oncological disease. RESULTS: Sixty-one per cent of AIRO members answered the proposed survey. Explored topics included career and expertise, indications to adjuvant RT, additional imaging in biochemical recurrence setting, use of salvage radiotherapy (SRT), management of clinically evident locoregional recurrence and future considerations. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, good level of agreement was found between participants for most of the topics. Most debated issues regarded, as expected, implementation of new imaging methods in this setting. Notably, trend in favour of early SRT vs. immediate adjuvant RT was underlined, and preference for global evaluation rather than isolated risk factors for RT indications was noticed.

MR imaging of rectal cancer before and after chemoradiation therapy.

PURPOSE: This study was done to determine the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in patients with rectal carcinoma by comparing post-chemoradiation MR imaging with pathological specimens. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We enrolled 39 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. All patients received chemoradiation therapy before surgery and neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy followed by MR imaging. MR images were analysed by a team of two expert radiologists unaware of the clinical and histopathological findings. RESULTS: Following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy, the analysis of MR images showed 23 (59%) patients with a rectal disease staged ≤T2 and 16 (41%) with a disease staged >T2. Post-treatment histological staging (TNM) revealed 13 patients with a disease >T2 and 26 patients with a disease ≤T2. Cohen's kappa to measure concordance between post-chemoradiation MR staging and histological response showed 83.6% concordance for disease confined to the serosa (≤T3): concordance was 97.22% for disease ≤N1 and 33.33% for disease >N1. CONCLUSIONS: MR imaging is critical for discovering T3 disease; moreover, morphological MR imaging does not always provide the opportunity to discern small residual cancer cells hidden in fibrotic tissue that could cause involvement of circumferential resection margin (CRM) on histology.