Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in pregnancy.

BACKGROUND: Pancreaticobiliary disease in pregnancy is relatively uncommon. The frequency of choledocholithiasis in pregnancy requiring intervention has been reported to be as low as one in 1200 deliveries. Traditionally, intervention in these patients has been surgical. Although surgery has an overall low morbidity and mortality for the expectant mother, it carries with it a 4- to 6-wk recovery period and a possibly increased risk of fetal wastage. Published information regarding the role and safety of ERCP in pregnancy is limited. This series of 23 pregnant patients undergoing ERCP was collected from six different medical centers. METHODS: Twenty-three pregnant patients with symptomatic pancreaticobiliary disease underwent a total of 29 ERCPs (three patients had diagnostic ERCP, and 20 had therapeutic ERCP). Fifteen, eight, and six procedures were performed in the first, second, and third trimesters, respectively. The only ERCP complication was pancreatitis in one patient. There was one spontaneous abortion (3 months after ERCP) and one neonatal death; however, casual relationship to ERCP was not apparent. CONCLUSION: Diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP appears reasonably safe and effective in pregnancy. Cautious and selective use of this procedure offers a viable alternative to surgery or observation in patients with emergent pancreaticobiliary problems.

A simple technique for laparoendoscopic management of choledocholithiasis.

Laparoscopic surgical treatment of calculous disease of the gallbladder and biliary system has largely replaced the open surgical approach because of its well known and obvious advantages. This approach has also changed the traditional management of biliary duct stones. Formally, biliary calculous disease was managed by the surgeon in one setting usually by laparotomy with choledochotomy and common duct exploration. Referral for postoperative Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and Endoscopic Sphincterotomy (ES) was most commonly done for retained stones.

Low-cost, office-based, screening colonoscopy.

OBJECTIVES: Performing full colonoscopy at regular intervals and removing lesions at an early stage might significantly lower the incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer. Such a program must be inexpensive, safe, and time-efficient. METHODS: Screening colonoscopy was performed on 639 patients. For a normal examination, the physician's time is limited to giving the medication for conscious sedation, performing the colonoscopy, and completing a written report form. The total charge for a normal screening colonoscopy is $150. RESULTS: Adenomatous and/or hyperplastic polyps were detected in 218 patients (34.1%). One hundred sixty adenomatous and 134 hyperplastic polyps were removed. Forty-eight percent (48.1%) of the adenomatous and 21.6% of the hyperplastic polyps were above the sigmoid colon. Six adenocarcinomas were detected in five patients. One patient had a delayed bleeding episode requiring no transfusion or therapeutic intervention, and one patient had a "post-polypectomy syndrome" requiring no therapeutic intervention. The average physician time in the endoscopy room for normal examinations was 18 min. CONCLUSIONS: Screening colonoscopy can be safely performed in an office facility. Physician time with the patient should be limited to allow a low cost that compares favorably with screening costs for other malignancies. Long-term studies to assess the capability of screening colonoscopy to lower mortality from colorectal cancer should continue.

Pancreatitis following bile duct sphincter of Oddi manometry: utility of the aspirating catheter.

The aspirating sphincter of Oddi manometry (SOM) catheter was shown to reduce the frequency of post-procedure pancreatitis from 31% to 4% following a pancreatic duct evaluation. This study was designed to prospectively evaluate the utility of the aspirating manometry catheter in reducing the frequency of pancreatic enzyme elevation and clinical pancreatitis following isolated bile duct manometry. Thirty-eight patients were randomly assigned to undergo bile duct SOM with the standard perfusion (infused group) catheter or the aspirating catheter (aspirated group). Overall, the frequency of both amylase and lipase level elevation at least two times the upper limits of normal was 30% at 2 hours, 25% at 6 hours, and 18% at 18 hours after the procedure and was similar for the aspirated and infused groups. No episodes of clinical pancreatitis occurred in either group. The SOM catheter was perfused with full-strength contrast in 12 consecutive patients undergoing a bile duct evaluation. Only one patient had any contrast material identified in the pancreatic duct. The results of this study support the theory that increased pancreatic duct hydrostatic pressure is the major cause for post-SOM pancreatitis and suggests that SOM evaluation of the bile duct alone appears to be safe.

Frequency of abnormal sphincter of Oddi manometry compared with the clinical suspicion of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction.

Patients with pancreaticobiliary pain or idiopathic pancreatitis have been classified as having definitive (type I), presumptive (type II), or possible (type III) sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD) based on clinical, laboratory, and ERCP data. This study was undertaken to determine the frequency of abnormal sphincter of Oddi manometry (SOM) when patients are classified by this system. Two hundred and thirteen patients with pancreaticobiliary pain were evaluated clinically; SOM, ERCP, and ductal contrast drainage time tests were performed. For biliary types I, II, and III, the frequency of abnormal SOM was 85.7%, 55.1%, and 28.1%, respectively. Similarly, for pancreatic types I, II, and III, an elevated basal sphincter pressure occurred in 92.3%, 58.2%, and 35.1%, respectively. When patients with an abnormal basal sphincter pressure were characterized by the magnitude of the elevation, the manometric profiles were similar for types I, II, and III. These data suggest that elevated sphincter pressure occurs more frequently in type III patients than previously reported, and supports consideration of SOM when evaluating and treating type II and type III patients.

Sphincter of Oddi manometry: decreased risk of clinical pancreatitis with use of a modified aspirating catheter.

This study was undertaken to determine whether routine use of a modified triple-lumen five French sphincter of Oddi manometry catheter would reduce the frequency and severity of post-manometry pancreatitis and pancreatic enzyme elevation. Seventy-six patients were alternately assigned to undergo sphincter of Oddi manometry (SOM) with a standard perfusion (infused group) catheter or the newly developed aspiration (aspirated group) catheter. After SOM, there were significantly more patients in the infused group with both amylase and lipase values elevated at least two times the upper limits of normal at 2 (p less than 0.001), 6 (p = 0.01), and 18 hours (p = 0.03) after the procedure. As compared with the standard perfusion system, the aspiration catheter was associated with a decreased frequency of clinical pancreatitis (23.5% vs. 3%, p = 0.01) reduced hospital stay (5 +/- 1.83 days, mean +/- SE, versus 1 day; p = 0.03) and milder pancreatitis. The aspiration manometry catheter should be considered for standard use for SOM, particularly if the pancreatic duct sphincter is being evaluated.