ABSTRACT
Calcium chloride has been advocated since the 1920s for the resuscitation of asystole, electromechanical dissociation (EMD), and ventricular fibrillation. Reports of side effects and complications have been numerous. Studies of calcium assays following American Heart Association recommended dosages have shown dangerously elevated serum levels. Large retrospective clinical studies in Milwaukee and Tampa have found no evidence of improved survival with calcium chloride in asystole and EMD. A prospective randomized double-blind study comparing calcium chloride and saline controls in the Milwaukee Paramedic system for asystole and EMD using standard AHA protocols showed no statistically significant difference in resuscitation rates or long-term survival between the calcium and no-calcium groups for the rhythm of asystole. Although patients with EMD had statistically improved resuscitation rates when calcium chloride was given, only one of the patients survived to hospital discharge. Because of the low rates of resuscitation and long-term survival in patients presenting in asystole and EMD, proving that calcium chloride does not enhance survival would require large multicenter trials. However, since no controlled study has ever documented significant benefit, its routine use in asystole and EMD cannot be supported. Calcium has long been used in medical treatment of hypocalcemic and hyperkalemic states and should be administered in moribund patients who have the proper clinical history and clinical signs of hypocalcemia.
