ABSTRACT
A microcomputer system for studying photo-plethysmography of the finger (PPF) was designed and applied to 50 non-premedicated healthy boys (one to ten years old) undergoing general anaesthesia (halothane in 70% N2O, with mechanical ventilation) for outpatient inguinal hernia repair. The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of computerized estimations of the photo-plethysmographic (arterial waves) amplitude and to evaluate whether or not PPF allows discrimination between two different surgical stimuli (skin incision, and manipulation of the spermatic cord). When anaesthesia was stable for at least five minutes (end-tidal halothane = 1.25-1.5%; PETCO2 = 32-38 mmHg; SpO2 > or = 98%; rectal temperature = 36.3-37 degrees C; ambient operating room temperature = 20-21 degrees C), and immediately before the skin incision, computerized estimations of the photo-plethysmographic (arterial waves) amplitudes (PPA) were recorded and saved for later comparison with direct (manual) measurements of the plethysmographic tracing, using an arbitrary scale of 0-255 units. Also, the values of PPA, systolic blood pressure, and pulse rate recorded immediately before the skin incision were later compared with the maximum changes in these same values recorded 30-90 sec after skin incision, and 30-90 sec after manipulation (traction+dissection) of the spermatic cord. Six boys (three to ten years old) stayed quiet enough, during induction of anaesthesia by mask, to allow regression analysis of PPA, systolic blood pressure, and pulse rate (Y) on end-tidal halothane/70% N2O (X). Computerized estimations tended to give a higher reading, by between 0.2 to 0.8 units, than direct measurements.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
