Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Heart ; 96(17): 1358-63, 2010 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20801854

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) has inherent limitations for displaying complex vascular anatomy, yet it remains the gold standard for stenosis quantification. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the accuracy of stenosis assessment by multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) and QCA compared to known dimensions. METHODS: Nineteen acrylic coronary vessel phantoms with precisely drilled stenoses of mild (25%), moderate (50%) and severe (75%) grade were studied with 64-slice MDCT and digital flat panel angiography. Fifty-seven stenoses of circular and non-circular shape were imaged with simulated cardiac motion (60 bpm). Image acquisition was optimised for both imaging modalities, and stenoses were quantified by blinded expert readers using electronic callipers (for MDCT) or lumen contour detection software (for QCA). RESULTS: Average difference between true and measured per cent diameter stenosis for QCA was similar compared to MDCT: 7 (+/-6)% vs 7 (+/-5)% (p=0.78). While QCA performed better than MDCT in stenoses with circular lumen (mean error 4 (+/-3)% vs 7 (+/-6)%, p<0.01), MDCT was superior to QCA for evaluating stenoses with non-circular geometry (mean error 10 (+/-7)% vs 7 (+/-5)%, p<0.05). In such lesions, QCA underestimated the true diameter stenosis by >20% in 9 of 27 (33%) vs 1 of 29 (3%) in lumen with circular geometry. CONCLUSIONS: QCA often underestimates diameter stenoses in lumen with non-circular geometry. Compared to QCA, MDCT yields mildly greater measurement errors in perfectly circular lumen but performs better in non-circular lesions. These findings have implications for using QCA as the gold standard for stenosis quantification by MDCT.


Subject(s)
Coronary Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Angiography/methods , Coronary Stenosis/pathology , Humans , Motion , Observer Variation , Phantoms, Imaging , Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Reproducibility of Results , Severity of Illness Index , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods
2.
Am Heart J ; 141(1): 148-53, 2001 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11136500

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to determine the effect of postoperative beta-blocker withdrawal on mortality and cardiovascular events after vascular surgery. METHODS: Detailed data were collected on perioperative cardiovascular medication use and discontinuation and cardiovascular risk factors among consecutive major vascular surgical procedures at two university hospitals. RESULTS: A total of 140 patients received beta-blockers preoperatively. Mortality in the 8 patients who had beta-blockers discontinued postoperatively (50%) was significantly greater than in 132 patients who had beta-blockers continued (1.5%, odds ratio 65.0, P<.001). The effect of beta-blocker discontinuation was unaffected by adjustment by stratification for risk factors (all P< or =.01), for contraindications to restarting beta-blockers (P = .006), and by multivariable analyses adjusting for potential confounders (adjusted odds ratio 17.0, P =.01). beta-Blocker discontinuation also was associated with increased cardiovascular mortality (0% vs 29%, P =.005) and postoperative myocardial infarction (odds ratio 17.7, P =.003). CONCLUSION: Discontinuing beta-blockers immediately after vascular surgery may increase the risk of postoperative cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.


Subject(s)
Adrenergic beta-Antagonists/adverse effects , Cardiovascular Diseases/chemically induced , Cardiovascular Diseases/mortality , Substance Withdrawal Syndrome , Vascular Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Aged , Humans , Postoperative Period , Preoperative Care , Risk Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...