A Seizure and Hemiplegia following Contrast Exposure: Understanding Contrast-Induced Encephalopathy.

Contrast-induced encephalopathy is a rare, reversible phenomenon known to occur after intravenous or intra-arterial contrast exposure. This report describes a case involving a 73-year-old female admitted for an elective thoracic aortic aneurysm repair. During the procedure, a large volume of nonionic iodinated contrast was necessary for arteriography. Postoperatively, the patient developed seizure activity followed by left-sided hemiplegia. Computed tomography (CT) of the brain without contrast and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were negative for acute stroke but did show residual contrast surrounding the brain. Antiepileptic medications were administered with resolution of the seizure activity. The patient was treated with supportive management and improved to baseline over the next seven days. This case demonstrates a rare, nonionic iodinated contrast-induced encephalopathy with seizure activity and transient hemiplegia. The unique imaging findings differentiate it from other neurologic conditions.

Is it possible to recover from traumatic brain injury and a Glasgow coma scale score of 3 at emergency department presentation?

INTRODUCTION: A Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 3 on presentation in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) portends a poor prognosis. Consequently, there is often a tendency to treat these patients less aggressively because of low expectations for a good outcome. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a retrospective review of patients with TBI and a GCS score of 3. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS): Group 1 (GOS=1-3) and Group 2 (GOS=4-5). A total of 62 patients were included. The overall mortality rate was 80.6%. At 6-month, 9 patients (14.5%) achieved a GOS 4-5. Compared to Group 2 (n=9), Group 1 (n=53) had higher average APACHE IV score (104±19 vs 89±27, p=0.04), more patients with bilateral fixed pupils (59% vs 22%, p=0.04), and higher ICP burden (50±34 vs 0±0, p=0.0001). Using the CRASH calculator, the estimated mortality at 14days was 66% compared to actual mortality of 81%; difference of 15%, (p=0.05), and the estimated GOS 1-3 was 85.5% compared to actual of 85.5%, (p=1.0). CONCLUSIONS: 14.5% of patients with TBI and a GCS of 3 at presentation achieved a good outcome at 6months, and 6.9% of patients with GCS of 3 and bilateral fixed pupils on presentation to the ED achieved a good outcome at 6months.

Do All Acute Stroke Patients Receiving tPA Require ICU Admission?

BACKGROUND: Limited resources warrant investigating models for predicting which stroke tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA) patients benefit from admission to neurologic intensive care unit (neuroICU). METHODS: This model classifies patients who on day 1 of their ICU admission are predicted to receive one or more of 30 subsequent active life supporting treatments. Two groups of patients were compared: low risk monitor (LRM) (patients who did not receive active treatment (AT) on the first day and whose risk of ever receiving active treatment was ≤ 10%) and AT (patients who received at least one treatment on any day of their ICU admission). RESULTS: Compared to LRM group (21 patients), AT group (59 patients) had similar age (75 ± 13 vs. 72 ± 17, P = 0.4), similar gender (male: 56% vs. 52%, P = 0.8), similar National Institutes of Health stroke scale (NIHSS, 16 ± 9 vs. 14 ± 8, P = 0.4), and higher Acute Physiologic and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) III scores (62 ± 26 vs. 41 ± 15, P = 0.0008). Compared to LRM group, AT group had longer ICU length of stay (4.5 ± 4.4 vs. 2.5 ± 1.3, P = 0.04), higher ICU mortality (22% vs. 4.7% (one patient DNR/hospice); OR: 5.6; 95% CI: 0.7 - 46.0; P = 0.1), and higher hospital mortality (36% vs. 4.7%; OR: 11; 95% CI: 1.4 - 88.0; P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: The outcome of LRM patients with stroke post-tPA suggests that they may not require admission to a formal neuroICU, improving resource use and reducing costs.

Transfusion of red blood cells is associated with improved central venous oxygen saturation but not mortality in septic shock patients.

BACKGROUND: Although the optimum hemoglobin (H) concentration for patients with septic shock (SS) has not been specifically investigated, current guidelines suggest that H of 7 - 9 g/dL, compared with 10 - 12 g/dL, was not associated with increased mortality in critically ill adults. This contrasts with early goal-directed resuscitation protocols that use a target hematocrit of 30% in patients with low central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2) during the first 6 hours of resuscitation of SS. METHODS: Data elements were prospectively collected on all patients with SS patients (lactic acid (LA) > 4 mmol/L, or hypotension). Out of a total of 396 SS patients, 46 patients received red blood cell (RBC) transfusion for ScvO2 < 70% (RBC group). We then matched 71 SS patients that did not receive RBC transfusion (NRBC group) on the following goals (G): LA obtained within 6 hours (G1), antibiotics given within 3 hours (G2), 20 mL/kg fluid bolus followed by vasopressors (VP) if needed to keep mean arterial pressure > 65 mm Hg (G3), central venous pressure > 8 mm Hg within 6 hours (G4) and ScvO2 > 70% within 6 hours (G5). RESULTS: In the RBC group, after one unit of RBC transfusion, ScvO2 improved from average of 63% (± 12%) to 68% (± 10%) (P = 0.02). Sixteen patients required another unit of RBC, and this resulted in increase of ScvO2 to 78% (± 11%) (P < 0.01). The RBC and NRBC groups were matched on sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores and all five goals. There was no difference in mortality between the two groups: 41% vs. 39.4% (OR: 0.8, 95% CI: 0.4 - 1.7, P = 0.6). CONCLUSIONS: In our study, transfusion of RBC was not associated with decreased mortality in SS patients.

Telemedicine intervention improves ICU outcomes.

Telemedicine for the intensive care unit (Tele-ICU) was founded as a means of delivering the clinical expertise of intensivists located remotely to hospitals with inadequate access to intensive care specialists. This was a retrospective pre- and postintervention study of adult patients admitted to a community hospital ICU. The patients in the preintervention period (n = 630) and during the Tele-ICU period (n = 2193) were controlled for baseline characteristics, acute physiologic scores (APS), and acute physiologic and health evaluation (APACHE IV) scores. Mean APS scores were 37.1 (SD, 22.8) and 37.7 (SD, 19.4) (P = 0.56), and mean APACHE IV scores were 49.7 (SD, 24.8) and 50.4 (SD, 21.0) (P = 0.53), respectively. ICU mortality was 7.9% during the preintervention period compared with 3.8% during the Tele-ICU period (odds ratio (OR) = 0.46, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.32-0.66, P < 0.0001). ICU LOS in days was 2.7 (SD, 4.1) compared with 2.2 (SD, 3.4), respectively (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.16, 95% CI, 1.00-1.40, P = 0.01). Implementation of Tele-ICU intervention was associated with reduced ICU mortality and ICU LOS. This suggests that there are benefits of a closed Tele-ICU intervention beyond what is provided by daytime bedside physicians.

Red blood cell transfusions and nosocomial infections in critically ill patients.

OBJECTIVE: A previous retrospective evaluation of Project Impact data demonstrated an association between red blood cell transfusions, nosocomial infections, and poorer outcomes in critically ill patients, independent of survival probability or patient age. The objective of this study was to determine whether transfused patients, independent of survival probability based on Mortality Prediction Model scores, have higher nosocomial infection rates, longer intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay, and higher mortality rates than nontransfused patients. DESIGN: Prospective, observational, cohort study. SETTING: A single-center, mixed medical/surgical, closed intensive care unit. PATIENTS: : Adults admitted to St. John's Mercy Medical Center between August 2001 and June 2003 (n = 2,085) were enrolled using Project Impact software. Both nonoperative and postoperative populations were represented, and transfusion decisions were made independently of patient study inclusion. Patients whose nosocomial infection was diagnosed before transfusion were counted as nontransfused. INTERVENTIONS: : None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Nosocomial infections, mortality rates, and intensive care unit and hospital length of stay were the main outcome measures. Of the 2,085 patients enrolled, 21.5% received red blood cell transfusions. The posttransfusion nosocomial infection rate was 14.3% in 428 evaluable patients, significantly higher than that observed in nontransfused patients (5.8%; p < .0001, chi-square). In a multivariate analysis controlling for patient age, maximum storage age of red blood cells, and number of red blood cell transfusions, only the number of transfusions was independently associated with nosocomial infection (odds ratio 1.097; 95% confidence interval 1.028-1.171; p = .005). When corrected for survival probability, the risk of nosocomial infection associated with red blood cell transfusions remained statistically significant (p < .0001). Leukoreduction tended to reduce the nosocomial infection rate but not significantly. Mortality and length of stay (intensive care unit and hospital) were significantly higher in transfused patients, even when corrected for illness severity. CONCLUSIONS: Red blood cell transfusions should be used sparingly, bearing in mind the potential risks of infection and poor outcomes in critically ill patients.

Percutaneous tracheostomy tube obstruction: warning.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To determine the patency of standard and modified Portex tracheostomy tubes inserted by the percutaneous dilatational technique. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: Medical-surgical ICUs in a tertiary care community hospital. PATIENTS: Medical-surgical ICU patients requiring tracheostomy. INTERVENTIONS: Consecutive medical-surgical ICU patients requiring tracheostomy were eligible for the study. Percutaneous tracheostomy tubes were inserted using the percutaneous dilatational technique with bronchoscopic guidance. The study population consisted of the following two groups: group 1 (receiving the standard Portex Per-fit percutaneous tracheostomy tube); and group 2 (receiving the modified Portex Per-fit percutaneous tracheostomy tube). Patients underwent daily fiberoptic evaluation to assess tracheostomy tube patency following the first 72 h after the tracheostomy tube placement. Demographic data and clinical signs or symptoms of airway obstruction were recorded. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients received the standard percutaneous tracheostomy tube (group 1), and 17 patients received the modified percutaneous tracheostomy tube (group 2). Partial tracheostomy tube occlusion (> 25%) was observed in 21 of 37 group 1 patients (57%) and in 1 of 17 group 2 patients (6%; p < 0.005). Fifteen of 37 group 1 patients (41%) and none of the group 2 patients sustained a > or = 40% occlusion of the distal tracheostomy tube opening (p < 0.005). One patient from group 1 had clinical manifestations of tracheostomy tube obstruction. None of the patients in group 2 experienced signs or symptoms of airway obstruction. CONCLUSIONS: The standard Portex Per-fit percutaneous tracheostomy tubes used in this study were associated with partial airway obstruction. Modifications of the standard Portex percutaneous tracheostomy tube markedly decreased the airway obstruction. Due to the findings in this study, the authors recommend abandoning the continued use of the Portex Per-fit percutaneous tracheostomy tube in its current configuration and replacing it with the modified tracheostomy tube described in this study.

Impact of allogenic packed red blood cell transfusion on nosocomial infection rates in the critically ill patient.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether critically ill patients who receive allogenic packed red blood cell transfusions are at increased risk of developing nosocomial infections during hospitalization. DESIGN: Retrospective database study utilizing Project IMPACT. SETTING: A 40-bed medical-surgical-trauma intensive care unit in an 825-bed tertiary referral teaching hospital. PATIENTS: One thousand seven hundred and seventeen patients admitted to the medical-surgical-trauma intensive care unit. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Data were collected by using the Project IMPACT database. Nosocomial infection rates were compared among three groups: the entire cohort, the transfusion group, and the nontransfusion group. We determined the nosocomial infection rates in these groups while adjusting for probability of survival by using Mortality Prediction Model (MPM-0) scores, age, gender, and number of units of packed red blood cells transfused. The average number of units transfused per patient was 4.0. The nosocomial infection rate for the entire cohort was 5.94%. The nosocomial infection rates for the transfusion group (n = 416) and the nontransfusion group (n = 1301) were 15.38% and 2.92%, respectively (p <.005 chi-square). Transfusion of packed red blood cells was related to the occurrence of nosocomial infection, and there was a dose-response pattern (the more units of packed red blood cells transfused, the greater the chance of nosocomial infection; p< 0.0001 chi-square). The transfusion group was six times more likely to develop nosocomial infection compared with the nontransfusion group. In addition, for each unit of packed red blood cells transfused, the odds of developing nosocomial infection were increased by a factor of 1.5. A subgroup analysis of nosocomial infection rates adjusted for probability of survival by using MPM-0 scores showed nosocomial infection to occur at consistently higher rates in transfused patients vs. nontransfused patients. A second subgroup analysis adjusted for patient age showed a statistically significant increase in rates of nosocomial infection for transfused patients regardless of age. CONCLUSIONS: Transfusion of packed red blood cells is associated with nosocomial infection. This association continues to exist when adjusted for probability of survival and age. In addition, mortality rates and length of intensive care unit and hospital stay are significantly increased in transfused patients.