Self-compression Technique vs Standard Compression in Mammography: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Many women dread undergoing mammography, and some may not attend or reattend breast cancer screening because of the discomfort or pain induced by breast compression. Objective: To evaluate the noninferiority of the self-compression mammography technique for reducing breast thickness compared with standard compression. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective, parallel-group, noninferiority randomized clinical trial was conducted from May 7, 2013, to October 26, 2015, at 6 cancer care centers in France. Participants were women aged 50 to 75 years, without a history of recent breast surgical procedure or treatment, and who could perform self-compression. Analyses were performed on intention-to-treat basis from January 27, 2017, to March 30, 2018. Interventions: Patients were randomized 1:1 to the self-compression group or the standard compression group. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary end point was breast thickness expressed as the mean of 4 views: right and left craniocaudal and right and left mediolateral oblique. The predefined noninferiority margin was a difference of 3 mm, with a 1-sided 95% CI. Secondary end points included compression force, image quality, requirement for additional views, pain, and patient satisfaction and radiographer assessment questionnaires. Results: Among the 549 women randomized, 548 (97.3%) completed the trial. Of these, 275 (48.8%) (mean [SD] age, 61.35 [6.34] years) were randomized to the self-compression arm and 273 (48.5%) (mean [SD] age, 60.84 [6.41] years) to the standard compression arm. The difference in the mean thickness between the 2 arms was lower than the noninferiority margin, with an upper 1-sided 95% CI less than 3 mm (-0.17; 95% CI,-∞ to 1.89 mm; P < .05). Compression force was higher in the self-compression group compared with the standard compression arm for the 4 mammographic views. Pain was statistically significantly lower in the self-compression group (n = 274) compared with the standard compression group (n = 269) (median [interquartile range (IQR)] score, 2 [1-5] vs 3 [1-5]; P = .009). No difference was reported in the image quality scores of the 2 groups or in the number of additional views performed (median [IQR] extra views, 2 [2-2] vs 2 [2-3] extra views; P = .64), whatever the indication, including insufficient image quality (29 [16.8%] vs 27 [15.0%] insufficient quality views; P = .65). No adverse effects or pain were reported by the participants after the self-compression mammography. Conclusions and Relevance: Self-compression does not appear to be inferior to standard compression mammography in achieving minimal breast thickness without increasing pain or compromising image quality; this technique may be an effective option for women who want to be involved in their breast examination. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02866591.

Radiofrequency ablation in palliative supportive care: early clinical experience.

We report our early experience with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in palliative supportive care. The medical files of eight patients were retrospectively reviewed. Four patients had a renal tumor, and nephrectomy was contraindicated in each patient since they had a poor general status. The fifth patient had a local recurrence in the site of a previous nephrectomy with a pancreatic tail extension, and surgical resection was contraindicated because of abdominal carcinomatosis. Two other patients had bone metastasis, one with a painful metastasis of mammary carcinoma in the head of the humerus resistant to radiotherapy, and the other with metastasis of the tibia of cutaneous melanoma. The last patient had a local recurrence of a sacral chordoma. Management, outcomes and complications were evaluated with 13.1+/-0.3 months follow-up. All five patients with renal carcinomas did not have local recurrence. The two patients treated for bone metastases had no pain 8 weeks after RFA and remained stable over time. One complication occurred 2 months after using the procedure to treat the chordoma, and this patient was hospitalized for a fistula between the sigmoid and hypogastric artery false aneurysm and subsequently died. In conclusion, RFA can be a safe and useful adjuvant treatment in supportive care or unresponsive cancer pain patients. However, the destruction of tumoral tissues in contact with sensitive structures using RFA should be done with caution due to potentially severe complications.

Dynamic maneuvers in local staging of head and neck malignancies with current imaging techniques: principles and clinical applications.

Imaging has been widely demonstrated to be important in local staging of head and neck malignancies as a complement to clinical examination, including endoscopy. Recent developments in multidetector row computed tomography (CT) provide better anatomic resolution within a shorter acquisition time and wider anatomic coverage. However, in many cases lesions still remain undefined. In such cases, performance of dynamic maneuvers could provide useful information about the local extent of a tumor. The usefulness of dynamic maneuvers has increased with the improvement in temporal and spatial resolution that resulted from the most recent techniques of multidetector row CT. The puffed cheek technique and the modified Valsalva maneuver allow evaluation of a lesion that was poorly demonstrated owing to apposition of mucosal surfaces. In some cases, phonation improves demonstration of small lesions of the vocal cords and allows more precise anatomic localization. The open mouth technique allows demonstration of a lesion that was previously overlooked due to dental amalgam artifacts.