Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 20(9): 881-7, 2008 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18794602

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: It is important to identify factors responsible for the development of Barrett's oesophagus (BO). The effect of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) on oesophageal clearance of both acid and alkaline reflux in these patients is uncertain and studies comparing BO patients and healthy controls (HCs) have not been performed earlier. METHODS: Two groups of patients were studied: 18 HCs and 12 BO patients. Oesophageal motility, acid reflux and duodenogastro-oesophageal reflux (DGOR) were measured using a three-pressure transducer catheter with an antimony pH tip, connected to a sodium ion selective electrode. All patients were studied both on and off PPIs. RESULTS: Without PPI therapy, BO patients had significantly more upright and supine acid reflux and upright DGOR compared with HCs. During acid reflux, HC demonstrated more peristalsis than BO [HC, % peristalsis=64 (9), BO=53 (8), P<0.01], but this was not seen during DGOR. [HC, % peristalsis=68 (14), BO=56 (11)]. In Barrett's patients, DGOR was significantly reduced with PPIs [off PPI, % upright DGOR=61 (17), on PPIs=19 (15), P<0.01], and no oesophageal motility differences were seen compared with results without PPIs. CONCLUSION: HCs demonstrate better oesophageal motility compared with BO patients to prevent acid and alkaline reflux. When acid reflux occurred, HCs had better coordinated motility to remove it. This increased coordination did not occur during DGOR, suggesting different stimulation mechanisms. PPI reduced DGOR in BO patients, without any change in oesophageal motility.


Subject(s)
Barrett Esophagus/complications , Gastroesophageal Reflux/etiology , Gastroesophageal Reflux/prevention & control , Proton Pump Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Adult , Barrett Esophagus/drug therapy , Barrett Esophagus/physiopathology , Duodenogastric Reflux/etiology , Duodenogastric Reflux/physiopathology , Duodenogastric Reflux/prevention & control , Esophageal pH Monitoring , Esophagus/physiopathology , Female , Gastroesophageal Reflux/physiopathology , Humans , Male , Manometry/methods , Middle Aged , Peristalsis/drug effects , Posture , Young Adult
2.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 17(10): 1047-52, 2005 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16148549

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the impact of infliximab therapy on health care resource utilization in the UK. METHODS: A retrospective audit was undertaken at seven centres in the UK, which reviewed patient notes for a period of 6 months before and 6 months after an initial infliximab infusion. Details of hospital admissions, outpatient visits, operations, diagnostic procedures, drug usage, and overall efficacy were collected. Results were compared for the two 6 month study periods. RESULTS: A total of 205 patients (62% female, median age 33 years) with moderate/severe Crohn's disease were audited. The majority of patients had chronic active disease (62%) and most received one infusion initially (72%). Clinicians rated 74% of responses as good to excellent and patients 72%. Most patients had concomitant immunosuppression (pre: 75%, post: 75%). Approximately half of the patients (45%) stopped taking steroids, with a further 34% having a dosage reduction. A fall of 1093 inpatient days was seen (1435 vs. 342) in the 6 months following infliximab administration. There were seven fewer operations, 33 fewer examinations under anaesthetic, and 99 fewer diagnostic procedures. Outpatient visits were similar pre- versus post- (555 vs. 534). The total reduction in direct costs amounted to an estimated pounds 591,006. Three hundred and fifty-three infliximab infusions were administered at an estimated cost of pounds 562,719. Thus, there was a net reduction of pounds 28,287 or pounds 137.98 per patient. CONCLUSIONS: Infliximab appears to be a potentially cost effective treatment for selected patients based on the reduced number of inpatient stays, examinations under anaesthetic, and diagnostic procedures over a 6 month period.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Crohn Disease/drug therapy , Health Resources/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antibodies, Monoclonal/economics , Antirheumatic Agents/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Crohn Disease/economics , Crohn Disease/surgery , Drug Costs/statistics & numerical data , Epidemiologic Methods , Female , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Health Services Research , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Infliximab , Male , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/antagonists & inhibitors , United Kingdom
3.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 15(3): 305-12, 2003 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12610326

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The metaplastic change of Barrett's oesophagus is linked to both acid and duodenal reflux together with impaired motility. Proton pump inhibitors (PPI) reduce acid reflux, but no treatment is available that reduces duodenogastro-oesophageal reflux (DGOR). The aim of this study was to investigate whether adding a prokinetic to PPI treatment could improve oesophageal motility and subsequently reduce reflux. METHODS: Two groups of patients with Barrett's oesophagus on PPI therapy (prokinetic, n = 12; placebo, n = 11) were investigated. At visit 1, ambulatory oesophageal manometry was performed, and peristaltic and simultaneous wave percentage and characteristics were measured. DGOR and pH measurements were also performed. After treatment with either the prokinetic cisapride or placebo, all investigations were repeated (visit 2). Analysis of covariance and Spearman's correlation coefficients of changes from visit 1 to visit 2 were used to compare data. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the two groups with respect to DGOR, DGOR characteristics, or the percentage of peristalsis and simultaneous waves and their characteristics. There was no correlation between DGOR and motility changes. Although no significant differences existed between acid reflux in the two groups, five patients with high supine acid reflux showed a significant reduction after treatment with cisapride. CONCLUSIONS: Addition of cisapride to PPI treatment does not appear to improve oesophageal motility or reduce DGOR in patients with Barrett's oesophagus.


Subject(s)
Barrett Esophagus/drug therapy , Cisapride/therapeutic use , Duodenogastric Reflux/drug therapy , Gastroesophageal Reflux/drug therapy , Proton Pump Inhibitors , Adult , Aged , Anti-Ulcer Agents/therapeutic use , Barrett Esophagus/etiology , Double-Blind Method , Drug Therapy, Combination , Duodenogastric Reflux/complications , Female , Gastroesophageal Reflux/complications , Gastrointestinal Agents/therapeutic use , Humans , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration/drug effects , Male , Middle Aged , Peristalsis/drug effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...