Pediatric rapid response system innovations.

Rapid Response Systems (RRSs) are an organizational approach to support the timely recognition and treatment of decompensating patients and are used in many pediatric hospitals. These systems are comprised of afferent and efferent Limbs, as well as oversight arms. When incorporated into an RRS, standardized care algorithms can be helpful in identifying deteriorating patients and improving behaviors of the multidisciplinary team. The aim of this paper is to provide an overview of pediatric RRS and provide an example in which standardized care algorithms developed for the efferent limb of a pediatric RRS were associated with improvement in early escalation of care.PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARYThe Rapid Response System (RRS) is used in hospitals to recognize and care for hospitalized patients that are decompensating outside of an Intensive Care Unit. RRSs are made up of two main response components. The afferent limb focuses on the recognition and calls for help; the efferent limb focuses on correcting the deteriorating patient's physiology. Much energy has been put into afferent limb development to identify worsening patients before they progress to full cardiac or respiratory arrest. Standardization of efferent limb care algorithms can assist in developing and maintaining a shared mental model of care to improve communication and function of the multidisciplinary team.

Characteristics of Pediatric Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Programs in the United States and Canada.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the current infrastructure and practice characteristics of pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) programs. A 40-question survey of center-specific demographics, practice structure, program experience, and support network utilized to cannulate and maintain a pediatric patient on ECMO was designed via a web-based survey tool. The survey was distributed to pediatric ECMO programs in the United States and Canada. Of the 101 centers that were identified to participate, 41 completed the survey. The majority of responding centers are university affiliated (73%) and have an intensive care unit (ICU) with 15-25 beds (58%). Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation has been offered for >10 years in 85% of the centers. The median number of total cannulations per center in 2017 was 15 (interquartile range [IQR] = 5-30), with the majority occurring in the cardiovascular intensive care unit (median = 13, IQR = 5-25). Fifty-seven percent of responding centers offer ECPR, with a median number of four cases per year (IQR = 2-7). Most centers cannulate in an operating room or ICU; 11 centers can cannulate in the pediatric ED. Sixty-three percent of centers have standardized protocols for postcannulation management. The majority of protocols guide anticoagulation, sedation, or ventilator management; left ventricle decompression and reperfusion catheter placement are the least standardized procedures. The majority of pediatric ECMO centers have adopted the infrastructure recommendations from the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization. However, there remains broad variability of practice characteristics and organizational infrastructure for pediatric ECMO centers across the United States and Canada.

Pediatric Critical Care Medicine Fellowship Simulation Use Survey.

OBJECTIVES: Simulation-based education is used in the U.S. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine fellowship programs, yet the prevalence and types of simulation used is unknown. A survey was developed to determine the prevalence, the perceived importance, and barriers associated with simulation-based education in these programs. DESIGN: A 43-item survey instrument was sent to all 66 U.S. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited Pediatric Critical Care Medicine fellowship programs during the summer of 2018. We defined simulation broadly as "any type of simulation that involved mannequins, task trainers, standardized actors, team training, etc." SETTING: An online survey was used to obtain information regarding simulation used in Pediatric Critical Care Medicine fellowship programs. SUBJECTS: All sixty-six U.S. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited Pediatric Critical Care Medicine fellowship programs were sent a survey request. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Forty-four of the 66 U.S. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited Pediatric Critical Care Medicine fellowship programs (67%) responded to the survey. Ninety-eight percent of responding programs (n = 43) use simulation-based education in their Pediatric Critical Care Medicine fellowship curriculum. Most programs (56%) have incorporated simulation training into their Pediatric Critical Care Medicine fellowship curriculum in the last 4-10 years (range, <1 to >15 yr, median 4-6 yr). A variety of principles, concepts, and programs were reported as used in their simulation programs. The most commonly reported barriers to Pediatric Critical Care Medicine fellowship simulation-based education were lack of funding (56%) and lack of faculty with simulation experience (56%). The majority of programs (64%; N = 28) think simulation-based education is absolutely necessary to Pediatric Critical Care Medicine fellowship training. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly, all responding U.S. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited Pediatric Critical Care Medicine fellowship programs use simulation-based education to train Pediatric Critical Care Medicine fellows with the majority perceiving simulation as absolutely necessary to Pediatric Critical Care Medicine fellow training. The reported types of simulation used in fellow training varied, as did training theories and concepts in the simulation programs. More research is needed to understand how to optimize and perhaps standardize parts of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine fellowship simulation training to improve the impact and outcomes of such training.

Healthcare Provider Perceptions of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality During Simulation Training.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the relationship between quantitative and perceived cardiopulmonary resuscitation performance when healthcare providers have access to and familiarity with audiovisual feedback devices. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: In situ simulation events throughout a pediatric quaternary care center where the use of continuous audiovisual feedback devices during cardiopulmonary resuscitation is standard. SUBJECTS: Healthcare providers who serve as first responders to in-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest. INTERVENTIONS: High-fidelity simulation of resuscitation with continuous audiovisual feedback. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Objective data was collected using accelerometer-based measurements from a cardiopulmonary resuscitation defibrillator/monitor. After the simulation event but before any debriefing, participants completed self-evaluation forms to assess whether they believed the cardiopulmonary resuscitation performed met the American Heart Association guidelines for chest compression rate, chest compression depth, chest compression fraction, chest compression in target, and duration of preshock pause and postshock pause. An association coefficient (kappa) was calculated to determine degree of agreement between perceived performance and the quantitative performance data that was collected from the CPR defibrillator/monitor. Data from 27 mock codes and 236 participants was analyzed. Average cardiopulmonary resuscitation performance was chest compression rate 106 ± 10 compressions per minute; chest compression depth 2.05 ± 0.6 in; chest compression fraction 74% ± 10%; chest compression in target 22% ± 21%; preshock pause 8.6 ± 7.2 seconds; and postshock pause 6.4 ± 8.9 seconds. When all healthcare providers were analyzed, the association coefficient (κ) for chest compression rate (κ = 0.078), chest compression depth (κ = 0.092), chest compression fraction (κ = 0.004), preshock pause (κ = 0.321), and postshock pause (κ = 0.40) was low, with no variable achieving moderate agreement (κ > 0.4). CONCLUSIONS: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation performance during mock codes does not meet the American Heart Association's quality recommendations. Healthcare providers have poor insight into the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during mock codes despite access to and familiarity with continuous audiovisual feedback.