Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 205(5): 1139-42, 2015 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26496564

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Selective sacral neuromodulation may fail after fluoroscopically guided lead placement because of malpositioning. We implemented a new technique to attain precise lead placement. CONCLUSION: CT-guided tined lead placement was successful in eight patients after 12-month follow-up. Especially in patients with an altered anatomy in the sacral region, this new technique may prevent treatment failure.


Subject(s)
Electric Stimulation Therapy/methods , Radiography, Interventional , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Urinary Bladder, Neurogenic/therapy , Adult , Aged , Electrodes, Implanted , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome
2.
World J Urol ; 32(4): 911-6, 2014 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24510119

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To test a novel technique of processing prostate biopsy specimen by marking the peripheral end (PE) as a predictive tool for positive resection margin after radical prostatectomy (RP) or for locally advanced carcinoma of the prostate (PC). METHODS: Prospective, multi-institutional study of a consecutive cohort of men who underwent prostate biopsy with marking the peripheral biopsy end and subsequent RP at the same institution. RESULTS: The study cohort comprised 445 men with a mean age of 63 years (40-77 years). Overall, PE-positive cores were found in 174 men (39.1 %) and R1 status was diagnosed in 132 men after RP (29.7 %). In the multivariate analysis, the presence of at least one PE-positive core was correlated with an increased risk of R1 status (OR 2.29, 95 % CI 1.31-4.00, p = 0.003) and was the strongest predictor followed by Gleason score, PSA and percentage of positive cores. Including all predictive parameters, a nomogram with a concordance index of 72.1 % was calculated. In the pT3/pT4 subgroup, PE positivity was the only predictive factor for R1 status (OR 3.03, 95 % CI 1.36-6.75, p = 0.006). In pT2 stage, no single factor was predictive for R1 status. PE-positive biopsies were not predictive for pT3/pT4 stages. CONCLUSIONS: PC at the peripheral end of prostate biopsy specimen predicts an increased risk of R1 status in subsequent RP. This simple and cheap technique may contribute to an increased accuracy of risk stratification for curative treatment for PC.


Subject(s)
Prostate/pathology , Prostatectomy , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery , Adult , Aged , Biopsy , Cohort Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Predictive Value of Tests , Prospective Studies , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...