[Long-term follow-up of 2 therapeutic programs for the treatment of high-risk childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Experience at the 20 de Noviembre National Medical Center]. / Seguimiento a largo plazo de dos programas terapéuticos para el tratamiento de la leucemia aguda linfoblástica infantil de riesgo alto. Experiencia del Centro Médico Nacional 20 de Noviembre.

This paper reports the long-term, disease-free survival of children with high-risk (HR) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) treated with two different chemotherapy regimens. HR was defined in children with ALL, younger than 2 or older than 10 years, with or without initial extrahematopoietic disease, with a leukocyte count higher than 25 x 10(9)L, or with L3 FAB type. The first group, LAL1, included 67 patients; they received induction with vincristine (VCR) and prednisone (PDN), early consolidation with 3 cycles of 6-mercaptopurine (6MP), citarabine (ARA) and VCR: central nervous system (CNS) prophylaxis (PFX) consisted of both chemotherapy in induction, consolidation and maintenance, radiotherapy (RT) in consolidation. Maintenance was given with 6MP, methotrexate (MTX), VCR adriamycin (ADR), ARA, cyclophosphamide (CFA) and PDN. The second group, LAL2, with 45 patients, received induction with VCR, PDN, CFA, epirrubicin (EPI), L-Asparaginase (L-ASP); early and late consolidation with 6MP, ARA, VCR, carmustine (BCNU), CFA, EPI, MTX and teniposide 8VM26): CNS PFX consisted of both chemotherapy in induction, consolidation and maintenance, RT in consolidation, maintenance with 6MP, MTX, EPI, CFA, ARA VM26 and BCNU. At the time of diagnosis, both groups were comparable. Disease-free survival probability, for LAL1 group was 0.41 at 14 years and for LAL2 group 0.34 at 8 years (p = 0.45). In the LAL1 group there were three failures and 20 relapses, and in the LAL2 group, there were two failures and 22 relapses. CNS relapses were one and seven in LAL1 and LAL2 groups respectively (p = 0.04). In the LAL2, group relapses were more frequent in patients with dose reduction or difered dose due to marrow toxicity (p = 0.02). We believe that the increase in CNS relapse in the LAL2 group was caused by the late administration of CNS PFX. We also believe that although intensive chemotherapy can increase long-term survival, dose adjustments due to marrow toxicity have a negative effect on long-term, relapse-free survival.

Neutrophil recovery time and adverse side effects in acute leukemia patients treated with intensive chemotherapy and concomitant G or GM-CSF.

OBJECTIVE: Compare the speed of neutrophil recovery and the unwanted secondary effects in two groups of acute leukemia patients treated with intensive chemotherapy and G or GM-CSF. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive subcutaneous G-CSF at a daily dose of 300 micrograms for adults and 150 micrograms for children or GM-CSF at 400 and 200 micrograms respectively, starting With chemotherapy and stopping when the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) reached 500/microL. Secondary effects were attributed to growth factors only when not coincidental with infection, chemotherapy or hemoderivative transfusion. RESULTS: 34 patients were included in the G-CSF arm and 37 in the GM-CSF arm. Distribution by sex, age, type of acute leukemia, induction or post-induction therapy, as well as initial neutrophil count were comparable among the two groups. Mean time for ANC > 500/microL was 19 days for G-CSF group and 16 days for GM-CSF group (p = 0.08). There were no statistically significant differences in secondary unwanted side effects between the two groups. There were two cases of growth factor-related-fever in the G-CSF group and five in the GM-CSF group (p = 0.25). There was a case of systemic reaction in the G-CSF group. Twenty-nine patients in each group presented febrile neutropenia episodes (p = 0.45). The only factor that showed significance on neutrophil recovery speed was type of leukemia (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: We found no clear advantage of one growth factor over the other for this indication.

[Comparison of 2 regimens of polychemotherapy in refractory acute leukemia or in relapse]. / Comparación de dos regímenes de poliquimioterapia en leucemia aguda refractaria o en recaída.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of two chemotherapy regimens for the treatment of relapsed and refractory acute leukemias. METHODS: We randomly assigned 24 patients in two groups: the LARR1 group received induction with 4 days of etoposide and 4 days of high-dose ara-C; the LARR2 group received induction therapy with 4 days of etoposide plus 3 days of mitoxantrone. Consolidation was given using the same drugs at the same dosage. Maintenance therapy was the same for both groups alternating methotrexate, vincristine, L-asparaginase, carmustine, cyclophosphamide and Ara-C. Every 15 weeks both groups repeated consolidation according to their group. Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor was used in both groups. RESULTS: Median survival for both groups was 5 months (range 1-17). Ten months after starting therapy three patients were disease free in the LARR1 group and two in the LARR2 group. There were no statistically significant differences in complete remission rate (p = 0.62), refractoriness (p = 0.58), deaths in induction (0.14) and other parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Our results were comparable with those of others. The only advantage we found was the possibility of using the LARR1 treatment in patients who have reached or are about to reach cardiotoxic-anthracycline doses.

[Long-term results of 2 therapeutic protocols in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia of usual risk. Experience at the 20th of November National Medical Center]. / Resultados a largo plazo de dos protocolos terapéuticos, en niños con leucemia linfoblástica aguda de riesgo habitual. Experiencia en el Centro Médico Nacional "20 de Noviembre".

The purpose of this study is to know the disease-free survival in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), submitted to two therapeutic programs. Habitual risk was defined as age older than 2 and younger than 10 years, without neurological, mediastinal or testicular infiltrations, leukocytes < 25 x 10(9)/l and morphologic cell type distinct of L-3. The first group (LAL81) included 30 patients, from 1981 to 1986, and they received: induction with vincristine (VCR) and prednisone (PDN); consolidation with mercaptopurine (MP), cytosine arabinoside (ARA) and doxorubicin (DOX); prophylaxis to the central nervous system (CNS) with radiotherapy and methotrexate (MTX)-ARA-hydrocortisone (HDR) intrathecal, and maintenance with MP and MTX. In the second group (LAL87), 28 patients were included from 1987 to 1993. They received: induction with VCR, PDN and lasparaginase (ASP); consolidation with MP, ARA, DOX, carmustine (BCNU) and cyclophosphamide (CFA); prophylaxis to the (CNS) with intrathecal MTX-ARA-HDR, and maintenance with MP and MTX. There was just one therapeutic failure. In the LAL81, protocol 11 relapses and 9 in LAL87 (p = 0.71) were observed. Of these, two in each group went to the CNS. The disease-free survival in LAL81 was 0.39 at 14 years; in LAL87, was 0.53 at 8 years (p = 0.62).

[Busulfan versus busulfan-interferon as maintenance therapy in chronic myeloid leukemia]. / Busulfán versus busulfán-interterón como terapia de mantenimiento en leucemia mieloide crónica.

We studied 30 patients in order to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and toxicity of alfa interferon associated with busulfan as maintenance treatment in de novo chronic granulocytic leukemia. Patients received 0.2 mg/kg of busulfan and reached complete hematological remission (CHR). Patients were then randomized in two groups: one to receive busulfan to be administered when the leukocyte count was above 15 x 10(9)/L, and another to receive subcutaneously 5 million IU of alpha-interferon three times per week (plus busulfan if the leukocyte count went above 15 x 10(9)/L). The duration of CHR was longer in the alfa-interferon group: 31 vs 16 months (p = 0.03) but no cytogenetic remissions were observed. Alfa interferon was well tolerated: no patient was excluded from the study due to toxicity.