Efficacy, safety and tolerability of the CCR1 antagonist BAY 86-5047 for the treatment of endometriosis-associated pelvic pain: a randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Antagonism of CC chemokine receptor type 1 (CCR1) may provide a novel treatment approach for women with symptomatic endometriosis. Studies of CCR1 antagonists in these patients have not been reported. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Women (n = 110; 18-45 years) with symptomatic endometriosis were randomized to BAY 86-5047 or placebo for 12 weeks. Pelvic pain was assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and women recorded the intake of pain medication in a diary. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of the absolute change in VAS score and the cumulative change in consumption of analgesics between baseline and the end of treatment. Safety assessments included adverse events, blood and urine evaluation and electrocardiography. RESULTS: Mean VAS scores decreased from 64.8 mm at baseline to 49.2 mm at week 12 in the BAY 86-5047 group and from 67.2 mm to 47.8 mm in the placebo group. The proportion of women using analgesics decreased from 33.9% to 11.5% or from 44.4% to 15.4% for patients who received BAY 86-5047 or placebo, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two treatment groups in terms of change in VAS scores (p = 0.45) or intake of analgesics (p = 0.82). A three-step sensitivity analysis failed to show superiority of BAY 86-5047 over placebo (p = 0.67). BAY 86-5047 was well tolerated and no significant safety concerns arose during the study. CONCLUSIONS: Based on these results, BAY 86-5047 is unlikely to be useful in the treatment of women with endometriosis-associated pelvic pain.

Adherence to a flexible extended regimen for oral hormonal contraception provided in blister packaging compared with an adherence-supporting digital tablet dispenser: historical comparison of data from two clinical studies.

BACKGROUND: The Clyk™ digital pill dispenser helps ensure correct and consistent administration of a flexible extended regimen of the combined oral contraceptive, ethinylestradiol (EE) 20 µg/drospirenone 3 mg (EE/drospirenone ; YAZ(®) Flex Flex), guiding users through the intake cycle and 4-day pill break and providing visible and acoustic daily reminders when pill intake is due. A study showed that the audible alarm function of the dispenser could help reduce the number of missed pills, but it lacked an appropriate "non-dispenser" group for a meaningful assessment of the impact of the dispenser on adherence. This study indirectly assessed the overall effect of the digital dispenser on adherence by comparing data from a treatment with standard blister packaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One-year adherence data were compared from two similarly designed, Phase III, open-label, randomized trials of EE/drospirenoneFlex. In study 1, women used diary cards to record adherence with EE/drospirenoneFlex dispensed in blister packs (n=640), and in study 2 the dispenser was used with the alarm activated (n=250) or deactivated (n=248) in addition to using diary cards. RESULTS: A mean (±SD) of 4.3 (±4.24) missed pills over 1 year were recorded in diary cards among women who dispensed their pills from the blister packages (study 1) compared with 1.0 (±2.4) recorded by the alarm-activated dispenser (study 2). In study 2, a mean of 1.9 (±4.2) missed pills were reported in the diaries over 1 year compared with 4.4 (±9.1) from automatic recording by the dispenser (both arms of study 2), indicating underreporting of missed pills in diary cards vs the digital dispenser. Adjusting for this rate of underreporting, an estimated mean of ten pills were missed over 1 year by women using EE/drospirenoneFlex in blister packs, or ten times more than with the digital dispenser with activated acoustic alarm. CONCLUSION: The digital dispenser helps reduce the number of missed pills and increases adherence.

Hormone withdrawal-associated symptoms with ethinylestradiol 20 µg/drospirenone 3 mg (24/4 regimen) versus ethinylestradiol 20 µg/desogestrel 150 µg (21/7 regimen).

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether the combined oral contraceptive (COC) ethinylestradiol (EE) 20 µg/drospirenone 3 mg taken in a 24/4-day regimen (ie, 4-day hormone-free interval) is more effective than an EE 20 µg/desogestrel (DSG) 150 µg COC taken in a 21/7-day regimen (ie, 7-day hormone-free interval) in reducing hormone withdrawal-associated symptoms (HWAS). METHODS: This double-blind, randomized study (NLM identifier: NCT01076582) was conducted at 34 centers in 12 countries. Otherwise healthy women who experienced ≥2 HWAS of headache, pelvic pain, and/or bloating when using their current COCs in a 21/7-day regimen were recruited. Subjects rated the severity of their HWAS daily on a seven-point Likert scale during a baseline cycle and during four 28-day cycles with EE/drospirenone 24/4 (n=290) or EE/DSG 21/7 (n=304). The primary variable was the mean change from baseline to cycle 4 in the composite HWAS score (sum of scores for all three symptoms) during cycle days 22-28. RESULTS: In the EE/drospirenone 24/4 group, the mean (standard deviation) composite HWAS score during cycle days 22-28 was reduced from 42.2 (24.8) at baseline to 12.8 (13.4) at cycle 4 (change from baseline: -30.3 [22.9]). In the EE/DSG 21/7 group, the corresponding value was reduced from 41.9 (25.8) to 14.3 (13.2) (change from baseline: -27.7 [24.8]), not significantly different versus EE/drospirenone 24/4. Bleeding pattern, treatment response, rescue medication use, compliance, quality of life, and tolerability were similar between treatments. CONCLUSION: Both EE/drospirenone 24/4 and EE/DSG 21/7 reduced the composite HWAS score from baseline to cycle 4 in otherwise healthy women. The differences between treatments were too small to be statistically significant.

Investigation of the hemostatic effect of a transdermal patch containing 0.55 mg ethinyl estradiol and 2.1 mg gestodene compared with a monophasic oral contraceptive containing 0.03 mg ethinyl estradiol and 0.15 mg levonorgestrel: an open-label, randomized, crossover study.

BACKGROUND: Transdermal delivery of contraceptives offers several advantages over combined oral contraceptives (COCs), including effective absorption and the provision of relatively constant serum concentrations. Ethinyl estradiol (EE) and the progestin gestodene are well-absorbed through the skin and, therefore, well-suited for use in a transdermal contraceptive patch. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of a once-weekly transparent, transdermal patch delivering low doses of EE and gestodene equivalent to a COC containing 0.02 mg EE and 0.06 mg gestodene on hemostasis parameters compared with a monophasic COC containing 0.03 mg EE and 0.15 mg levonorgestrel. METHODS: In this single-center, open-label, randomized, crossover study, 30 women (aged 18-35 years) received three cycles of each treatment, separated by a two-cycle washout period. The primary outcome measure was the absolute change from baseline in prothrombin fragments 1 + 2 and D-dimer. RESULTS: For both treatments, prothrombin fragments 1 + 2 remained stable during the first treatment period, and increased only slightly in the second period (mean absolute change 0.025 and 0.028 nmol/L in the novel Bayer patch and COC groups, respectively). Increases in D-dimer were observed in both periods (mean absolute change 107.0 ± 147.2 ng/L for the novel Bayer patch and 113.7 ± 159.0 ng/L for the COC). There were no statistically significant treatment differences in prothrombin 1 + 2 or D-dimer (p = 0.667 and p = 0.884, respectively) and no statistically significant treatment sequence or period effects. CONCLUSION: A COC containing 0.03 mg EE and 0.15 mg levonorgestrel and the novel Bayer patch have comparable influence on hemostatic endpoints. Both treatments were well-tolerated by subjects.

EE-drospirenone-levomefolate calcium versus EE-drospirenone + folic acid: folate status during 24 weeks of treatment and over 20 weeks following treatment cessation.

BACKGROUND: Adequate folate supplementation in the periconceptional phase is recommended to reduce the risk of neural tube defects. Oral contraceptives may provide a reasonable delivery vehicle for folate supplementation before conception in women of childbearing potential. This study aimed to demonstrate that a fixed-dose combination of an oral contraceptive and levomefolate calcium leads to sustainable improvements in folate status compared with an oral contraceptive + folic acid. METHODS: This was a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study in which 172 healthy women aged 18-40 years received ethinylestradiol (EE)-drospirenone-levomefolate calcium or EE-drospirenone + folic acid for 24 weeks (invasion phase), and EE-drospirenone for an additional 20 weeks (folate elimination phase). The main objective of the invasion phase was to examine the area under the folate concentration time-curve for plasma and red blood cell (RBC) folate, while the main objective of the elimination phase was to determine the duration of time for which RBC folate concentration remained ≥ 906 nmol/L after cessation of EE-drospirenone-levomefolate calcium. RESULTS: Mean concentration-time curves for plasma folate, RBC folate, and homocysteine were comparable between treatment groups during both study phases. During the invasion phase, plasma and RBC folate concentrations increased and approached steady-state after about 8 weeks (plasma) or 24 weeks (RBC). After cessation of treatment with levomefolate calcium, folate concentrations decreased slowly. The median time to RBC folate concentrations falling below 906 nmol/L was 10 weeks (95% confidence interval 8-12 weeks) after cessation of EE-drospirenone-levomefolate calcium treatment. Plasma and RBC folate levels remained above baseline values in 41.3% and 89.3% of women, respectively, at the end of the 20-week elimination phase. CONCLUSION: Improvements in folate status were comparable between EE-drospirenone-levomefolate calcium and EE-drospirenone + folic acid. Plasma and RBC folate levels remained elevated for several months following cessation of treatment with EE-drospirenone-levomefolate calcium.

Pituitary, ovarian and additional contraceptive effects of an estradiol-based combined oral contraceptive: results of a randomized, open-label study.

BACKGROUND: The estrogen step-down/progestogen step-up 28-day estradiol valerate/dienogest (E(2)V/DNG) oral contraceptive effectively inhibits ovulation; however, limited data are available regarding its effects on estradiol (E2), progesterone, luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) or its additional extraovarian contraceptive effects. STUDY DESIGN: In this secondary analysis, 100 women received E(2)V 3 mg on days 1-2, E(2)V 2 mg/DNG 2 mg on days 3-7, E(2)V 2 mg/DNG 3 mg on days 8-24, E(2)V 1 mg on days 25-26 and placebo on days 27-28 for one treatment cycle. Measures included the presence/absence of cervical mucus; endometrial thickness; and serum E2, progesterone, and gonadotropin levels. RESULTS: E2, progesterone, LH and FSH levels did not exhibit the typical ovulatory increase and remained relatively stable during the cycle. E(2)V/DNG reduced mean maximal endometrial thickness and proportion of women with visible cervical mucus. All parameters returned to pretreatment levels during the posttreatment cycle. CONCLUSION: E(2)V/DNG provides extraovarian contraceptive effects (reducing endometrial thickness and cervical mucus production) in addition to inhibiting ovulation, assuring contraceptive efficacy.

Bioequivalence evaluation of a folate-supplemented oral contraceptive containing ethinylestradiol/drospirenone/levomefolate calcium versus ethinylestradiol/drospirenone and levomefolate calcium alone.

BACKGROUND: Neural tube defects (NTDs) are congenital malformations that occur during early embryonic development. Suboptimal maternal folate status is a well-known risk factor for the occurrence of NTDs, and periconceptional folic acid supplementation has been shown to reduce the risk of NTDs. Folate-supplemented oral contraceptives (OCs) offer a means of improving folate status in women of childbearing potential by increasing their likelihood of having raised folate levels at the time of conception. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to demonstrate bioequivalence of ethinylestradiol (EE), drospirenone and L-5-methyl-tetrahydrofolate (L-5-methyl-THF; active moiety of levomefolate calcium) when taken as a new folate-supplemented OC containing EE/drospirenone/levomefolate calcium, with the respective OC containing EE/drospirenone and a tablet containing levomefolate calcium only. METHODS: This was a randomized, open-label, three-period crossover study carried out at a single centre in Germany. The study included 45 healthy women (age range 18-38 years). The women were randomly assigned to single doses of (i) EE 0.03 mg/drospirenone 3 mg/levomefolate calcium 0.451 mg (SAFYRAL®), (ii) EE 0.03 mg/drospirenone 3 mg (Yasmin®), and (iii) levomefolate calcium 0.451 mg, administered using a crossover design, with one or more menstrual cycle washout between doses. The primary variables were maximum concentrations (C(max)) and area under the concentration versus time curve (AUC) values for EE, drospirenone and L-5-methyl-THF. RESULTS: The bioavailability of EE and drospirenone was similar after administration of EE/drospirenone/levomefolate calcium and EE/drospirenone. The geometric mean ratios (GMRs) and its 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for AUC values and C(max) were within the pre-specified range (80.00-125.00%) for bioequivalence for EE and drospirenone in both formulations. The bioavailability of L-5-methyl-THF was similar after administration of EE/drospirenone/levomefolate calcium and levomefolate calcium. The respective GMRs and 90% CIs of baseline-uncorrected and -corrected AUC(last) (AUC from time zero to time of last measurable concentration) and C(max) were also within the 80.00-125.00% range. CONCLUSION: The novel folate-supplemented OC EE/drospirenone/levomefolate calcium is bioequivalent to the established OC Yasmin® (EE/drospirenone components) and to levomefolate calcium (folate component).

Contraceptive efficacy and tolerability of ethinylestradiol 20 µg/drospirenone 3 mg in a flexible extended regimen: an open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled study.

BACKGROUND: The contraceptive efficacy and tolerability of a new flexible extended regimen of ethinylestradiol (EE) 20 µg/drospirenone (DRSP) 3 mg to extend the menstrual cycle and enable management of intracyclic (breakthrough) bleeding (flexible(MIB)) was investigated and the bleeding pattern compared with a conventional 28-day regimen and a fixed extended 124-day regimen. STUDY DESIGN: This Phase III, 2-year, multicentre, open-label study randomly (4:1:1) allocated women (aged 18-35 years) to the following regimens: flexible(MIB) (24-120 days' active hormonal intake with 4-day tablet-free intervals); conventional (24 days' active hormonal intake followed by a 4-day hormone-free interval); or fixed extended (120 days' uninterrupted active hormonal intake followed by a 4-day tablet-free interval). Primary outcomes included the number of bleeding/spotting days during Year 1 (all regimens) and the number of observed unintended pregnancies over 2 years (flexible(MIB) only). RESULTS: Results were analysed in 1067 women (full analysis set). The mean number of bleeding/spotting days was lower with the flexible(MIB) vs the conventional regimen [41.0±29.1 (95% CI 38.8-43.3) vs 65.8±27.0 (95% CI 62.2-69.4) days, p<0.0001; treatment difference -24.8 (95% CI -29.2 to -20.3) days]. The corresponding value for the fixed extended regimen was 60.9±51.1 (95% CI 53.9-67.9) days. The Pearl Index for the flexible(MIB) regimen was 0.64 (95% CI 0.28-1.26). All regimens had comparable tolerability profiles. CONCLUSIONS: EE 20 µg/DRSP 3 mg administered as a flexible extended regimen with MIB is effective, well tolerated and is associated with statistically significantly fewer bleeding/spotting days and fewer withdrawal bleeding episodes vs EE/DRSP in a conventional 28-day regimen. The flexible(MIB) also provided statistically significantly fewer spotting days vs EE/DRSP in a fixed extended 124-day regimen (post hoc evaluation). The flexible(MIB) regimen allows women to extend their menstrual cycle and manage their intracyclic (breakthrough) bleeding.

Long-term tolerability of ethinylestradiol 20 µg/drospirenone 3 mg in a flexible extended regimen: results from a randomised, controlled, multicentre study.

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to assess the long-term safety and tolerability of a new flexible extended regimen of ethinylestradiol (EE) 20 µg/drospirenone (DRSP) 3 mg, which allows management of intracyclic (breakthrough) bleeding [flexible management of intracyclic (breakthrough) bleeding (MIB)], in comparison to conventional 28-day and fixed extended regimens. STUDY DESIGN: In this Phase III, multicentre, open-label study, women (aged 18-35 years) were randomised to EE/DRSP in the following regimens: flexible(MIB) (24-120 days' active hormonal intake followed by a 4-day tablet-free interval), conventional 28-day (24 days' active hormonal intake followed by a 4-day hormone-free interval) or fixed extended (120 days' uninterrupted active hormonal intake followed by a 4-day tablet-free interval) during a 1-year comparative phase. Thereafter, women entered a 1-year safety extension phase in which the majority received the flexible(MIB) regimen. Safety/tolerability outcomes were measured over 2 years. A separate analysis of certain safety parameters (endometrial, hormonal, lipid, haemostatic and metabolic variables) was conducted at two of the study centres. RESULTS: Results were analysed in 1067 and 783 women in the comparative and safety extension phases. Overall, 56.3% of women experienced ≥1 adverse event (AE) in the safety extension phase. Serious AEs occurred in 3.0%, 1.4% and 3.3% of women receiving the flexible(MIB), conventional and fixed extended regimens, respectively. No unexpected endometrial, hormonal, lipid, haemostatic or metabolic findings occurred with any of the three regimens. CONCLUSIONS: EE/DRSP in a flexible extended regimen with management of intracyclic (breakthrough) bleeding is well-tolerated and, when administered for up to 2 years, has a good safety profile comparable to other estrogen/progestogen oral contraceptives.

Bleeding profile of a flexible extended regimen of ethinylestradiol/drospirenone in US women: an open-label, three-arm, active-controlled, multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Unscheduled bleeding may affect satisfaction and compliance with extended oral contraceptive (OC) regimens. The bleeding patterns of two variants of a flexible dosing regimen designed to manage intracyclic bleeding problems during extended cycles were compared with that of a conventional OC regimen. STUDY DESIGN: This was a 1-year, open-label, active-controlled, Phase 3 study conducted in the USA. Healthy women (18-45 years) received an ethinylestradiol (EE) 20 mcg/drospirenone 3 mg OC in two flexible extended regimens or in a conventional 24/4 (i.e., 28-day) regimen. The primary regimen [management of intracyclic bleeding (flexible(MIB)) regimen] was an extended dosing regimen that required subjects to initiate 4-day tablet-free intervals after 3 days of breakthrough bleeding/spotting. An alternative extended regimen [active period control (flexible(APC)) regimen] allowed subjects to initiate a 4-day tablet-free interval irrespective of the occurrence of bleeding. Bleeding profiles were compared between treatments. Efficacy and safety outcomes were also assessed. RESULTS: The full analysis set comprised 1864 women (flexible(MIB), N=1406; flexible(APC), N=232; conventional 24/4, N=226). Over 1 year, subjects in the flexible(MIB) group experienced significantly fewer (mean±SD, 40±30) bleeding/spotting days than those in the conventional 24/4 group (52±35). The corresponding value in the flexible(APC) group was 47±33 days. The pregnancy rate in the flexible(MIB) group was 1.65 per 100 woman-years (95% confidence interval, 0.96-2.65). All three regimens were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: A flexible(MIB) dosing regimen of EE 20 mcg/drospirenone 3 mg is associated with good contraceptive efficacy and fewer bleeding/spotting days than the conventional 24/4 regimen.

Bioequivalence study of an oral contraceptive containing ethinylestradiol/drospirenone/levomefolate calcium relative to ethinylestradiol/drospirenone and to levomefolate calcium alone.

BACKGROUND: A new tablet formulation containing 0.02 mg ethinylestradiol/3 mg drospirenone/0.451 mg levomefolate calcium (calcium salt containing 0.416 mg L-5-methyltetrahydrofolate) was assessed for bioequivalence compared to the approved oral contraceptive (OC) tablet containing identical amounts of ethinylestradiol and drospirenone and to a tablet containing 0.451 mg levomefolate calcium. STUDY DESIGN: Forty-four subjects received in an intraindividual crossover design single doses of the new tablet formulation or the established ethinylestradiol/drospirenone tablet or the levomefolate calcium tablet. RESULTS: Bioequivalence was demonstrated for ethinylestradiol, drospirenone and L-5-methyltetrahydrofolate (active moiety of levomefolate calcium) between the investigated tablet formulations. The geometric mean ratios of the AUC((0-tlast)) and C(max) values for all three compounds and their 90% confidence intervals were well within the 80%-125% range generally accepted to demonstrate bioequivalence. CONCLUSION: The rate and extent of absorption of ethinylestradiol and drospirenone were not affected by the concomitant administration of levomefolate calcium and vice versa.

Folate status and homocysteine levels during a 24-week oral administration of a folate-containing oral contraceptive: a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, parallel-group, US-based multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: This study investigated the effects of adding levomefolate calcium 0.451 mg (the calcium salt of L-5-methyltetrahydrofolate; Metafolin®) to an oral contraceptive containing ethinylestradiol (EE) 20 mcg/drospirenone (drsp) 3 mg on folate levels in healthy women seeking contraception. STUDY DESIGN: In this randomized, double-blind, multicenter US-based study, women (18-40 years) received 24 weeks (six cycles) of EE/drsp/levomefolate calcium or EE/drsp for 24 days followed by 4 days of levomefolate calcium alone or placebo, respectively. The primary efficacy variables were red blood cell (RBC) and plasma folate levels at 24 weeks. RESULTS: At week 24, increases from baseline in mean RBC (990 ± 390 nmol/L to 1406 ± 440 nmol/L) and plasma folate (45.0 ± 17.6 nmol/L to 60.8 ± 19.9 nmol/L) levels were observed in women who received EE/drsp/levomefolate calcium [per protocol set (n=262); all values are displayed as mean ± standard deviation]. In contrast, marginal fluctuations were observed with EE/drsp (p<.0001 for between-treatment differences at week 24). CONCLUSION: Clinically significant increases in folate status were observed with EE/drsp/levomefolate calcium compared with EE/drsp alone in US women of childbearing age.

Efficacy and safety of a low-dose combined oral contraceptive containing drospirenone 3 mg and ethinylestradiol 20 mcg in a 24/4-day regimen.

OBJECTIVE: The study was conducted to assess the efficacy of a low-dose combined oral contraceptive (COC) containing drospirenone (drsp) 3 mg/ethinylestradiol (EE) 20 mcg administered for 24 days of active treatment followed by a 4-day hormone-free interval (24/4 regimen). STUDY DESIGN: In this open-label uncontrolled study conducted in 50 European centers, healthy females aged 18-35 years with a body mass index of less than 30 kg/m(2) received drsp 3 mg/EE 20 mcg 24/4 over 13 cycles. The primary efficacy variable was the number of unintended pregnancies. RESULTS: Five pregnancies occurred among 1101 women over 13,248 treatment cycles, resulting in a Pearl Index (PI) of 0.49 with an upper two-sided 95% CI limit of 1.14. Of these pregnancies, three were attributed to noncompliance with tablet use resulting in an adjusted PI for 'perfect use' of 0.22 (upper limit of two-sided 95% CI: 0.80) based on 11,755 cycles. CONCLUSION: Drospirenone 3 mg/EE 20 mcg 24/4 is a highly effective COC in nonobese women.

Ovulation inhibition with four variations of a four-phasic estradiol valerate/dienogest combined oral contraceptive: results of two prospective, randomized, open-label studies.

BACKGROUND: Attempts to improve the tolerability of combined oral contraceptives (COCs) have included the substitution of ethinylestradiol (EE) with 17beta-estradiol (E2). However, this has proved unsatisfactory, specifically in terms of cycle control. To improve upon the poor cycle control seen previously, E2 [in the form of estradiol valerate (E2V); 1 mg of E2V contains 0.76 mg of E2] was combined with dienogest (DNG) in a novel four-phasic regimen. In the current studies, the ovulation-inhibition potency of four variations of this regimen was assessed. STUDY DESIGN: Two randomized, open-label, Phase II studies were performed. The first study compared two regimens (Regimens 1A and 2A) with similar dosages of DNG but different lengths of application. Having established in Study 1 that the length of application of Regimen 2A was most suitable, but that the dosages of DNG were too low for effective ovulation inhibition, a second study, which compared two regimens (Regimens 2B and 2C) with similar lengths of application but with increased dosages of DNG, was undertaken. The primary efficacy variable in both studies was the proportion of women with a Hoogland score of 5 or 6 during Cycle 2. RESULTS: The full analysis set comprised 192 and 203 women in Studies 1 and 2, respectively. In Study 1, 10 women (10.9%) in Regimen 1A and 6 women (6.4%) in Regimen 2A had a Hoogland score of 5 or 6. In Study 2, three women (3.1%) in Regimen 2B and one woman (1.0%) in Regimen 2C had a Hoogland score of 5 or 6. There were no safety concerns with any of the regimens. CONCLUSION: The results of these studies identified a four-phasic COC preparation comprising E2V/DNG that provides efficient ovulation inhibition. It is expected that this regimen will lead to an innovative COC containing E2 instead of EE.

Suppression of ovarian activity with a drospirenone-containing oral contraceptive in a 24/4 regimen.

BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to compare ovarian activity of an oral contraceptive containing drospirenone (drsp) 3 mg plus ethinylestradiol (EE) 20 mcg administered in 24/4 regimen compared with the conventional 21/7 regimen, during intended use and following predefined dosing errors. STUDY DESIGN: Women aged 18-35 years who ovulated or had a follicular diameter of >or=15 mm on or before Day 23 during a pretreatment cycle were admitted into this double-blind, randomized study. Participants underwent 3 treatment cycles with drsp 3 mg/EE 20 mcg in a 24/4 (n=52) or a 21/7 (n=52) regimen. In the third treatment cycle, the initial three pills in both groups were replaced with placebos. Ovarian activity was classified using the Hoogland scale during pretreatment and during Cycles 2 and 3. RESULTS: Suppression of ovarian activity was more pronounced with the 24/4 regimen--the odds ratio for a lower Hoogland score (i.e., greater ovarian suppression) with the 24/4 regimen compared with the conventional 21/7 regimen were 6.01 (95% CI: 2.29-17.94) and 3.06 (95% CI: 1.44-6.65) for Cycles 2 and 3, respectively. More women in the 24/4 regimen group had no ovarian activity 87.8% vs. 56.0% during Cycle 2 and 55.1% vs. 30.0% during Cycle 3. The 24/4 regimen was associated with a more consistent suppression (less fluctuation) of endogenous estradiol. CONCLUSION: The drsp 3 mg/EE 20 mcg oral contraceptive in a 24/4 regimen was associated with greater ovarian suppression (despite intentional dosing error), which results in decreased hormonal fluctuations, and may increase contraceptive efficacy with the low-dose formulation.