Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Clin Oral Implants Res ; 25(1): 74-81, 2014 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23735182

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To test the fracture load and fracture patterns of zirconia abutments restored with all-ceramic crowns after fatigue loading, exhibiting internal and external implant-abutment connections as compared to restored and internally fixed titanium abutments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A master abutment was used for the customization of 5 groups of zirconia abutments to a similar shape (test). The groups differed according to their implant-abutment connections: one-piece internal connection (BL; Straumann Bonelevel), two-piece internal connection (RS; Nobel Biocare ReplaceSelect), external connection (B; Branemark MkIII), two-piece internal connection (SP, Straumann StandardPlus) and one-piece internal connection (A; Astra Tech AB OsseoSpeed). Titanium abutments with internal implant-abutment connection (T; Straumann Bonelevel) served as control group. In each group, 12 abutments were fabricated, mounted to the respective implants and restored with glass-ceramic crowns. All samples were embedded in acrylic holders (ISO-Norm 14801). After aging by means of thermocycling in a chewing simulator, static load was applied until failure (ISO-Norm 14801). Fracture load was analyzed by calculating the bending moments. Values of all groups were compared with one-way ANOVA followed by Scheffé post hoc test (P-value<0.05). Failure mode was analyzed descriptively. RESULTS: The mean bending moments were 464.9 ± 106.6 N cm (BL), 581.8 ± 172.8 N cm (RS), 556.7 ± 128.4 N cm (B), 605.4 ± 54.7 N cm (SP), 216.4 ± 90.0 N cm (A) and 1042.0 ± 86.8 N cm (T). No difference of mean bending moments was found between groups BL, RS, B and SP. Test group A exhibited significantly lower mean bending moment than the other test groups. Control group T had significantly higher bending moments than all test groups. Failure due to fracture of the abutment and/or crown occurred in the test groups. In groups BL and A, fractures were located in the internal part of the connection, whereas in groups RS and SP, a partial deformation of the implant components occurred and cracks and fractures of the zirconia abutment were detected. CONCLUSION: The differently connected zirconia abutments exhibited similar bending moments with the exception of one group. Hence, the type of connection only had a minor effect on the stability of restored zirconia abutments. In general, restored titanium abutments exhibited the highest bending moments.


Subject(s)
Crowns , Dental Abutments , Dental Implants, Single-Tooth , Dental Restoration Failure , Dental Stress Analysis , Titanium/chemistry , Zirconium/chemistry , Ceramics/chemistry , Dental Implant-Abutment Design , In Vitro Techniques , Mastication , Materials Testing
2.
Clin Oral Implants Res ; 24(8): 839-46, 2013 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22672584

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to compare the clinical, aesthetic and radiological outcome of immediately placed implants in sockets with or without periapical pathology 5 years after placement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven patients were followed 5 years after immediate implant placement (test-group: 12 patients with periapical pathologies; control-group: 15 patients without periapical pathology). Clinical (FMBS, FMPS, CAL, keratinized mucosa), aesthetical (length of clinical crown, Papilla index), and radiological (vertical distance implant shoulder to first bone to implant contact (IS-BIC)) parameters were assessed. Both 95% confidence intervals, as well as results of statistical tests (one-sample, two-sample, paired t-test) were provided. RESULTS: After 5 years the implant survival rate was 100% for all 27 implants. In the test group the width of the keratinized mucosa increased significantly over the observation period (0.8 ± 1.0 mm). Concerning aesthetic parameters at the 3-month as well as at the 5-year examination no statistically significant difference could be found between the two groups. In the control-group the papilla mesial and distal to the implant increased statistically significant during the observation period by 0.5 ± 0.5 and 0.4 ± 0.6 index score points, respectively. The position of the gingival margin at the implant site and the two neighboring teeth remained stable. At the 5-year visit IS-BIC measured between 1.4 ± 0.5 mm (mesial, control) and 1.7 ± 0.7 mm (distal, test), no significant difference could be found between the two groups. Over the observation period no statistically significant change of IS-BIC could be found in the test- as well as in the control-group. None of the examined radiographs revealed any signs of retrograde peri-implantitis. CONCLUSION: The replacement of teeth exhibiting periapical pathologies by implants placed immediately after tooth extraction can be a successful treatment modality with no disadvantages in clinical, aesthetical and radiological parameters to immediately placed implants into healthy sockets.


Subject(s)
Dental Implantation, Endosseous/methods , Periapical Diseases/complications , Tooth Socket/surgery , Absorbable Implants , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Alveolar Process/diagnostic imaging , Bone Substitutes/therapeutic use , Collagen , Crowns , Dental Plaque Index , Esthetics, Dental , Follow-Up Studies , Gingiva/pathology , Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal/methods , Humans , Membranes, Artificial , Middle Aged , Minerals/therapeutic use , Osseointegration/physiology , Periodontal Attachment Loss/complications , Periodontal Index , Prospective Studies , Radiography , Tooth Extraction , Treatment Outcome
3.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants ; 27(3): 505-12, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22616042

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to examine the bending moments and fracture patterns of different zirconia abutments with internal implant-abutment connections after static loading and to compare their bending moments to those of internally connected titanium abutments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three types of customized zirconia abutments (Straumann CARES abutments/Straumann BL implants [T1], Astra ZirDesign abutments/Astra Micro Thread OsseoSpeed implants [T2], Zirabut prototype abutments/Straumann SP implants [T3]) and one type of customized titanium abutment (control group, Straumann CARES abutments/Straumann BL implants [C]) were included. All abutments were one-piece abutments with an internal implant-abutment connection and were customized to the same shape but featured different implant-abutment connection designs. For each group, 20 identical copies of a master abutment were fabricated and fixed on their corresponding implants. Half of the abutments in each group were left unrestored, and the other 10 received glass-ceramic crowns. Static loading was applied at a 30-degree angle to the palatal surface until failure, and bending moments were calculated. The type of failure was characterized visually by dismounting the abutments and by examination of cross-sections of the embedded specimens. The results were analyzed statistically. RESULTS: The mean range of bending moments was higher for the unrestored groups (158.2 to 678.2 Ncm) than for the restored groups (117.9 to 419.4 Ncm). The highest mean bending moments were seen in the control group, both restored and unrestored (419.4/678.2 Ncm). Unrestored, T1 and T2 exhibited significantly higher bending moments than T3. This was also observed in the restored groups. CONCLUSION: Both the abutment material and the implant-abutment connection design affected the bending moments of abutments after static loading. Internally connected zirconia abutments with horizontal mismatch to the implant exhibited significantly higher bending moments compared to those without horizontal mismatch.


Subject(s)
Dental Abutments , Dental Implant-Abutment Design , Dental Porcelain , Dental Stress Analysis , Dental Prosthesis Retention , Dental Restoration Failure , Elasticity , Humans , Statistics, Nonparametric , Titanium , Zirconium
4.
Clin Oral Implants Res ; 23(1): 12-8, 2012 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21443610

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To test the fracture load of zirconia abutments with different types of implant-abutment connections after chewing simulation and to compare their bending moments to internally connected identical titanium abutments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-eight identical customized zirconia abutments with different implant-abutment connections were fabricated for four different test groups: one-piece internal implant-abutment connection (BL; Straumann Bonelevel), two-piece internal implant-abutment connection (RS; Nobel Biocare Replace Select), external implant-abutment connection (B; Brånemark MK III), two-piece internal implant-abutment connection (SP; Straumann Standard Plus). Twelve titanium abutments with one-piece internal implant-abutment connection (T; Straumann Bonelevel) served as control group. After aging by means of thermocycling (5-50°C, 120 s) and chewing simulation (1,200,000 cycles, 49 N load, 1.67 Hz), static load was applied at a 30° angle to the palatal surface until failure. Bending moments were calculated for comparison of the groups. Data were analyzed descriptively and by performing the Kruskal-Wallis test with Bonferroni correction. RESULTS: The mean bending moments of the abutments were 714.1 ± 184.9 N cm (T), 331.7 ± 57.8 N cm (BL), 429.7 ± 62.8 N cm (RS), 285.8 ± 64.4 N cm (B) and 379.9 ± 59.1 N cm (SP). The bending moments of control group T were significantly higher than those of all other groups. The values of group RS were significantly higher than those of group B but within the value range of groups SP and BL. CONCLUSION: The bending moments of the different tested types of zirconia abutments vary with different implant-abutment connections after chewing simulation. The use of a secondary metallic component might have a beneficial influence on the stability of zirconia abutments.


Subject(s)
Dental Abutments , Dental Implant-Abutment Design , Dental Stress Analysis , Mastication/physiology , Titanium/chemistry , Zirconium/chemistry , Dental Restoration Failure , Materials Testing , Statistics, Nonparametric , Stress, Mechanical
5.
Clin Oral Implants Res ; 22(1): 20-7, 2011 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20678132

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: the aim of the present study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcome of immediately placed implants in sockets with or without periapical pathology 3 years after implant placement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: twenty-nine patients with immediate implant placement were clinically and radiologically followed 3 years after implant placement (test group: 16 patients without periapical pathology, control group: 13 patients with periapical pathologies). Clinical (full-mouth bleeding score, full-mouth plaque score, clinical attachment level measurements and width of keratinized mucosa buccaly of the implant) and radiological parameters (vertical distance from the implant shoulder to the first bone-to-implant contact [IS-BIC]) were assessed. Both 95% confidence intervals, as well as results of statistical tests (one-sample, two-sample and paired t-test) were provided. RESULTS: the implant survival rate was 100% for all 29 implants after 3 years. The clinical and radiological parameters showed no statistically significant difference between the test and the control group at 3 years (two-sample t-test). The IS-BIC was between 1.54 ± 0.88 mm (mesial, test) and 1.69 ± 0.92 mm (distal, test). Between the 1- and 3-year visit the IS-BIC increased in both groups significantly on one side of the implant: 0.30 ± 0.37 mm (mesial, test) and 0.33 ± 0.43 mm (distal, control) (one-sample t-test). None of the 13 examined radiographs of implants immediately placed in sockets with periapical pathologies revealed retrograde peri-implantitis after 3 years. CONCLUSION: it is concluded within the limitations of this study, that after careful debridement of the extraction socket, immediate placement of implants into sites with periapical pathologies can be a successful treatment modality for at least 3 years with no disadvantages in clinical and radiological parameters to immediately placed implants into healthy sockets.


Subject(s)
Alveolar Bone Loss/etiology , Dental Implantation, Endosseous/methods , Osseointegration , Periapical Periodontitis/complications , Tooth Socket/surgery , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Alveolar Bone Loss/diagnostic imaging , Contraindications , Dental Implantation, Endosseous/adverse effects , Dental Restoration Failure , Follow-Up Studies , Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal/methods , Humans , Middle Aged , Peri-Implantitis/etiology , Periapical Periodontitis/diagnostic imaging , Periodontal Index , Prospective Studies , Radiography , Root Canal Therapy/adverse effects , Statistics, Nonparametric , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...