Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Clin Nutr ; 113(5): 1199-1208, 2021 05 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33668050

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although there is growing evidence on the role of preconception nutrition for birth outcomes, very few studies have evaluated the long-term effects of nutrition interventions during the preconception period on offspring cognitive outcomes. OBJECTIVE: We evaluate the impact of preconception weekly multiple micronutrients (MMs) or iron and folic acid (IFA) supplementation compared with folic acid (FA) alone on offspring intellectual functioning at age 6-7 y. METHODS: We followed 1599 offspring born to women who participated in a double-blinded randomized controlled trial of preconception supplementation in Vietnam. Women received weekly supplements containing either 2800 µg FA only, 60 mg iron and 2800 µg FA, or MMs (15 micronutrients including IFA) from baseline until conception, followed by daily prenatal IFA supplements until delivery. We used the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children to measure full-scale IQ (FSIQ) and 4 related domains of intellectual functioning [Verbal Comprehension Index (VCI), Perceptual Reasoning Index (PRI), Working Memory Index (WMI), and Processing Speed Index (PSI) scores] at 6-7 y. Group comparisons were done using ANOVA tests for all children and the subgroup born to women who consumed the supplements ≥26 wk before conception (per-protocol analyses). RESULTS: The final sample with data at 6-7 y (n = 1321) was similar for baseline maternal and offspring birth characteristics and age at follow-up by treatment group. Compared with the offspring in the FA group, those in the MM group had higher FSIQ (ß = 1.7; 95% CI: 0.1, 3.3), WMI (ß = 1.7; 95% CI: 0.2, 3.2), and PSI (ß = 2.5; 95% CI: 0.9, 4.1). Similar findings were observed in the per-protocol analyses. There were no significant differences by treatment group for VCI and PRI. CONCLUSIONS: Preconception supplementation with MMs improved certain domains of intellectual functioning at age 6-7 y compared with FA. These findings suggest the potential for preconception micronutrient interventions to have long-term benefits for offspring cognition.


Subject(s)
Dietary Supplements , Micronutrients/administration & dosage , Micronutrients/pharmacology , Prenatal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena , Adult , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Pregnancy , Vietnam/epidemiology , Young Adult
2.
J Nutr ; 147(8): 1593-1601, 2017 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28615372

ABSTRACT

Background: Maternal health and nutrition play a crucial role in early child growth and development. However, little is known about the benefits of preconception micronutrient interventions beyond the role of folic acid (FA) and neural tube defects.Objective: We evaluated the impact of weekly preconception multiple micronutrient (MM) or iron and folic acid (IFA) supplementation on child growth and development through the age of 2 y compared with FA alone.Methods: We followed 1599 offspring born to women who participated in a randomized controlled trial of preconception supplementation in Vietnam. Women received weekly supplements that contained either 2800 µg FA, 60 mg Fe and 2800 µg FA, or 15 MMs including IFA, from baseline until conception followed by daily prenatal IFA supplements until delivery. Child anthropometry was measured at birth and at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 mo. Child development was measured with the use of the Bayley Scales for Infant Development III at 24 mo.Results: The groups were similar for baseline maternal and offspring birth characteristics. At 24 mo of age, the offspring in the IFA group had significantly higher length-for-age z scores (LAZs) (0.14; 95% CI: 0.03, 0.26), reduced risk of being stunted (0.87; 95% CI: 0.76, 0.99), and smaller yearly decline in LAZs (0.10; 95% CI: 0.04, 0.15) than the offspring in the FA group. Similar trends were found for the offspring in the MM group compared with the FA group for LAZs (0.10; 95% CI: -0.02, 0.22) and the risk of being stunted (0.88; 95% CI: 0.77, 1.01). Offspring in the IFA group had improved motor development (P = 0.03), especially fine motor development (0.41; 95% CI: 0.05, 0.77), at the age of 24 mo, but there were no differences for measures of cognition or language.Conclusions: Preconception supplementation with IFA improved linear growth and fine motor development at 2 y of age compared with FA. Future studies should examine whether these effects persist and improve child health and schooling. The trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01665378.


Subject(s)
Body Height , Child Development , Dietary Supplements , Folic Acid/therapeutic use , Iron/therapeutic use , Motor Skills , Preconception Care , Child, Preschool , Growth Disorders/prevention & control , Humans , Infant , Iron, Dietary/therapeutic use , Male , Micronutrients/therapeutic use , Nutritional Status , Vietnam
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...