A research agenda for gastrointestinal and endoscopic surgery.

BACKGROUND: Development of a research agenda may help to inform researchers and research-granting agencies about the key research gaps in an area of research and clinical care. The authors sought to develop a list of research questions for which further research was likely to have a major impact on clinical care in the area of gastrointestinal and endoscopic surgery. METHODS: A formal group process was used to conduct an iterative, anonymous Web-based survey of an expert panel including the general membership of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES). In round 1, research questions were solicited, which were categorized, collapsed, and rewritten in a common format. In round 2, the expert panel rated all the questions using a priority scale ranging from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest). In round 3, the panel re-rated the 40 questions with the highest mean priority score in round 2. RESULTS: A total of 241 respondents to round 1 submitted 382 questions, which were reduced by a review panel to 106 unique questions encompassing 33 topics in gastrointestinal and endoscopic surgery. In the two successive rounds, respectively, 397 and 385 respondents ranked the questions by priority, then re-ranked the 40 questions with the highest mean priority score. High-priority questions related to antireflux surgery, the oncologic and immune effects of minimally invasive surgery, and morbid obesity. The question with the highest mean priority ranking was: "What is the best treatment (antireflux surgery, endoluminal therapy, or medication) for GERD?" The second highest-ranked question was: "Does minimally invasive surgery improve oncologic outcomes as compared with open surgery?" Other questions covered a broad range of research areas including clinical research, basic science research, education and evaluation, outcomes measurement, and health technology assessment. CONCLUSIONS: An iterative, anonymous group survey process was used to develop a research agenda for gastrointestinal and endoscopic surgery consisting of the 40 most important research questions in the field. This research agenda can be used by researchers and research-granting agencies to focus research activity in the areas most likely to have an impact on clinical care, and to appraise the relevance of scientific contributions.

National trends in utilization and outcomes of bariatric surgery.

BACKGROUND: Because of the growing interest in surgery to treat morbid obesity, this study examined changes in the utilization and in-hospital outcomes of bariatric surgery in the United States over a 10-year period. METHODS: Data were obtained from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, the largest all-payer discharge database in the United States. International Classification of Disease (ICD-9) codes were used to identify all bariatric procedures performed for adults from 1990 to 2000. Population-based rates of surgery for each year were calculated by applying sampling weights and U.S. Census data. Secular trends in annual rates of surgery, changes in patient characteristics, and in-hospital mortality and complications were analyzed. RESULTS: From 1990 to 2000, the national annual rate of bariatric surgery increased nearly six fold, from 2.4 to 14.1 per 100,000 adults (p = 0.001). There has been more than a ninefold increase in the use of gastric bypass procedures (1.4 to 13.1 per 100,000; p < 0.001). This represents an increase from 55% of all bariatric procedures in 1990 to 93% of such procedures in 2000 (p < 0.001). The rates of in-hospital mortality were low (0.4% overall), but increased slightly over time (0.2% in 1990 to 0.5% in 2000; p = 0.009). There is no significant difference in adjusted mortality for the past 8 years, but a slight rise did occur over the full 10-year period. The rates for reoperation (1.3%) and pulmonary emboli (0.3%) remained stable. The rates for respiratory failure associated with bariatric surgery declined from 7.7% in 1990 to 4.5% in 2000 (p < 0.001). Over this time, the mean length of hospital stay declined from 6.0 to 4.1 days (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The annual rate of bariatric surgery in the United States increased nearly six fold between 1990 and 2000, with little change in in-hospital morbidity and mortality. This appears to be driven largely by the increasing popularity of gastric bypass procedures.

Response of atypical symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux to antireflux surgery.

BACKGROUND: Atypical manifestations of gastro-oesophageal reflux (GOR) include asthma, chest pain, cough and hoarseness. The effectiveness of antireflux surgery for these symptoms is uncertain. The present study compared symptomatic response rates for typical and atypical GOR symptoms after fundoplication. METHODS: Between October 1991 and January 1998, 324 patients underwent laparoscopic fundoplication at Emory University Hospital and returned postoperative questionnaires. Severity of typical (heartburn) and atypical (asthma, chest pain, cough and hoarseness) GOR symptoms was reported by patients on a 0-4 scale before surgery, and at 6 and 52 weeks after operation. Patients were stratified based on preoperative symptoms into three groups: group 1 (severe heartburn/minimal atypical symptoms), group 2 (severe heartburn/severe atypical symptoms) and group 3 (minimal heartburn/severe atypical symptoms). RESULTS: In group 1 (n = 173) heartburn improved in 99 per cent and resolved in 87 per cent. In group 2 (n = 95) heartburn improved in 95 per cent and resolved in 76 per cent, and atypical symptoms improved in 94 per cent and resolved in 42 per cent. In group 3 (n = 56) atypical symptoms improved in 93 per cent and resolved in 48 per cent. Although all symptoms were improved by fundoplication, resolution was more likely for heartburn than for atypical symptoms. CONCLUSION: Atypical symptoms of GOR are improved by fundoplication, but symptom resolution occurs in fewer than 50 per cent of patients.

The decision-making value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients seen in a referral center for suspected biliary and pancreatic disease.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the ability of MRCP to alter the differential diagnosis and to prevent diagnostic and/or therapeutic ERCP. The diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) for biliary and pancreatic disease is well documented. Some believe MRCP may prevent diagnostic ERCP or add useful information, however there are no reports of its impact on clinical management. METHODS: Consecutive patients referred for ERCP underwent clinic evaluation, then MRCP, and then ERCP. In Phase 1, the number of differential diagnoses and the perceived need for diagnostic ERCP were evaluated after each step by the endoscopist who performed the ERCP. In Phase 2, the process was repeated after presenting clinical information and MRCP results to different individual physicians: another endoscopist, a hepatologist, a radiologist, and a surgeon (all were blinded to ERCP results). RESULTS: Forty patients were enrolled. Clinical contexts were jaundice (19.7%), abnormal liver enzymes (42.6%), abdominal pain (11.5%), recurrent acute pancreatitis (11.5%), and suspected complications of chronic pancreatitis (14.7%). In Phase 1, adding MRCP information to diagnostic ERCP information did not change the mean number of differential diagnoses significantly and prevented no therapeutic ERCP. In Phase 2, adding MRCP to clinical information only (without ERCP) reduced the differential diagnosis significantly for the radiologist and the surgeon only and would have prevented < or =3% of diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP for all physicians. CONCLUSION: The value of MRCP information may be limited if patient selection is inappropriate and may differ in physicians depending on their speciality.

Laparoscopic fundoplication failures: patterns of failure and response to fundoplication revision.

OBJECTIVE: To determine rates and mechanisms of failure in 857 consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease or paraesophageal hernia (1991-1998), and compare this population with 100 consecutive patients undergoing fundoplication revision (laparoscopic and open) at the authors' institution during the same period. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Gastroesophageal fundoplication performed through a laparotomy or thoracotomy has a failure rate of 9% to 30% and requires revision in most of the patients who have recurrent or new foregut symptoms. The frequency and patterns of failure of laparoscopic fundoplication have not been well studied. METHODS: All patients undergoing fundoplication revision were included in this study. Symptom severity was scored before and after surgery by patients on a 4-point scale. Evaluation of patients included esophagogastroscopy, barium swallow, esophageal motility, 24-hour ambulatory pH, and gastric emptying studies. Statistical analysis was performed with multiple chi-square analyses, Fisher exact test, and analysis of variance. RESULTS: Laparoscopic fundoplication was performed in 758 patients for gastroesophageal reflux disease and in 99 for paraesophageal hernia. Median follow-up was 2.5 years. Thirty-one patients (3.5%) have undergone revision for fundoplication failure. The mechanism of failure was transdiaphragmatic herniation of the fundoplication in 26 patients (84%). In 40 patients referred from other institutions, after laparoscopic fundoplication, only 10 (25%) had transdiaphragmatic migration (p < 0.01); a slipped or misplaced fundoplication occurred in 13 patients (32%), and a twisted fundoplication in 12 patients (30%). The failure mechanisms of open fundoplication (29 patients) followed patterns previously described. Fundoplication revision procedures were initiated laparoscopically in 65 patients, with six conversions (8%). The morbidity rate was 4% in laparoscopic procedures and 9% in open ones. There was one death, from aspiration and adult respiratory distress syndrome after open fundoplication. A year or more after revision operation, heartburn, chest pain, and dysphagia were rare or absent in 88%, 78%, and 91%, respectively, after laparoscopic revision, and were rare or absent in 91%, 83%, and 70%, respectively, after open revision, but 11 patients ultimately required additional operations for continued or recurrent symptoms, 3 after open revision (17%), and 8 after laparoscopic fundoplication (11%). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic fundoplication failure is infrequent in experienced hands; the rate may be further reduced by extensive esophageal mobilization, secure diaphragmatic closure, esophageal lengthening (applied selectively), and avoidance of events leading to increased intraabdominal pressure. When revision is required, laparoscopic access may be used successfully by the laparoscopically experienced esophageal surgeon.

Common laparoscopic procedures in swine: a review.

Swine serve as excellent models for many laparoscopic procedures. As more operations are being performed laparoscopically, it is essential for the surgeon to have a good understanding of laparoscopic techniques. This manuscript reviews some commonly performed laparoscopic operations with an emphasis on models in swine. Porcine anatomy is generally similar to human anatomy with some minor differences. Practice on porcine models can help refine techniques and increase efficiency and skill.

Improvement in quality of life measures after laparoscopic antireflux surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if patients with gastroesophageal reflux "well controlled medically" had a different quality of life from those with residual symptoms receiving aggressive medical therapy, and to determine whether laparoscopic antireflux surgery significantly altered quality of life in patients with gastroesophageal reflux. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Clinical determinants of outcome may not adequately reflect the full impact of therapy. The medical outcomes study short form (SF-36) is a well-validated questionnaire that assays eight specific health concepts in three general fields. It may provide a more sensitive tool for judging the success of antireflux therapy. METHODS: A total of 345 patients undergoing laparoscopic antireflux surgery completed at least one questionnaire during the study period. Preoperative questionnaires were completed by 290 patients, 223 completed a questionnaire 6 weeks after surgery, and 50 completed the same questionnaire 1 year after surgery. A subgroup of 70 patients was divided before surgery into two groups on the basis of their response to standard medical therapy. RESULTS: Preoperative scores were extremely low. All eight SF-36 health categories improved significantly 6 weeks and 1 year after surgery. In the 70-patient subgroup, 53 patients (76%) underwent laparoscopic antireflux surgery because of symptoms refractory to medical therapy and 17 patients (24%) reported that their symptoms were well controlled but elected to have surgery because they wished to be medication-free. The preoperative quality of life scores of these two patient groups were equivalent in all but one category. Postoperative scores were significantly improved in all categories and indistinguishable between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic antireflux surgery is an effective therapy for patients with gastroesophageal reflux and may be more effective than medical therapy at improving quality of life.

Laparoscopic antireflux surgery in the elderly.

OBJECTIVE: Laparoscopic antireflux surgery is indicated in young patients with medication-dependent gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), both because of their need for lifelong medical treatment and the need to prevent the complications of GERD. Many elderly patients with GERD have similar concerns. We compared the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic antireflux surgery in the elderly with the results achieved in patients <65 yr. METHODS: A total of 359 patients have had laparoscopic antireflux surgery in our hospital, 42 of whom were > or = 65 yr of age. Symptoms were scored from 0 (none) to 4 (severe) before and after surgery. Ambulatory pH monitoring was also performed before and after surgery. Results were compared between age groups with the Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: Elderly patients had significantly higher preoperative American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores (mean 2.4 vs 2.0) (p = 0.0024), but otherwise there were no significant differences in preoperative symptom scores or pH results. Both groups demonstrated equivalent postoperative improvement in symptoms and 24-h pH study. There was no mortality in either group, and there was no significant difference in morbidity or hospital stay between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic antireflux surgery is a safe and effective treatment of GERD in the elderly and should not be refused solely on the basis of age.

Laparoscopic fundoplication for dysphagia and peptic esophageal stricture.

Peptic esophageal stricture with dysphagia is a late manifestation of severe gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Although laparoscopic fundoplication is an effective antireflux operation, its efficacy for persons with peptic esophageal stricture and dysphagia has not been well defined. The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes after fundoplication in this subgroup of GERD patients. Forty GERD patients with moderate, severe, or incapacitating dysphagia and peptic esophageal stricture were compared to a control group of 121 GERD patients without significant dysphagia or stricture. Reflux symptom severity was scored by each patient preoperatively and at most recent follow-up postoperatively (mean 1.5 years) using a scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0 = symptoms absent; 4 = symptoms incapacitating). Symptom scores were compared by the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Postoperative redilation and fundoplication failure rates were also determined. At a mean follow-up of 1.5 years after fundoplication, the median dysphagia score had improved from 3 to 0 (P <0.001) in stricture patients and remained low (score 0) in the control group. The median heartburn score also improved from 3 to 0 (P <0.001) in stricture patients, with an identical response in the control group (P <0.001). Among dysphagia/stricture patients, 35 (87.5%) reported overall satisfaction and have not required secondary medical treatment or esophageal dilation. Four patients (10%) have required endoscopic redilation for residual dysphagia and one (2.5%) had reoperation for fundoplication herniation shortly after operation. Laparoscopic fundoplication is an effective therapy for patients with dysphagia and peptic esophageal stricture.

Laparoscopic Heller myotomy and fundoplication for achalasia.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to review the authors' results with laparoscopic cardiomyotomy and partial fundoplication for achalasia. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Pneumatic dilatation and botulinum toxin (BOTOX) injection of the lower esophageal sphincter largely have replaced cardiomyotomy for treatment of achalasia. After a brief experience with a thoracoscopic approach, the authors elected to perform cardiomyotomy laparoscopically, in combination with a partial fundoplication (anterior or posterior). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty patients were treated between July 1992 and November 1996. Thirty patients had previous therapy of achalasia, 21 with pneumatic dilation, 1 with BOTOX, 6 with balloon and BOTOX, and 2 with transthoracic cardiomyotomy. Three patients had previous laparoscopic fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux. Symptom scores (0 = none to 4 = disabling) were obtained before surgery and after surgery. Barium swallows and esophagogastroduodenoscopy were performed in all patients. Esophageal motility study was performed in 36 patients. Laparoscopic Heller myotomy and fundoplication was performed through five upper abdominal trocars. A 7-cm myotomy extended 6 cm above the GE junction and 1 cm below the GE junction. A posterior fundoplication was performed in 32 patients, anterior fundoplication in 7 patients, and no fundoplication in 1 patient. Statistical inference was performed with a Wilcoxon signed rank test. RESULTS: Mean operative duration was 199 +/- 36.2 minutes. Mean hospital stay was 2.75 days (range, 1-13 days). Dysphagia was alleviated in all but four patients (90%), and regurgitation in all but two patients (95%) (p < 0.001). Chest pain and heartburn improved significantly (p < 0.01) as well. Intraoperative complications included mucosal laceration in six patients and hypercarbia in one. Postoperative pneumonia developed in two patients, and one patient had moderate hemorrhage from an esophageal ulcer 2 weeks after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic cardiomyotomy and fundoplication appears to provide definitive treatment of achalasia with rapid rehabilitation and few complications.

Complications of laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair.

The complications of laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair at two institutions were reviewed to determine the rate and type of complications. A total of 76 patients underwent laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair between December 1992 and April 1996. Seventy-one of them had fundoplication (6 required a Collis-Nissen procedure). Five patients underwent hernia reduction and gastropexy only. There was one conversion to laparotomy. Traumatic visceral injury occurred in eight patients (11%) (gastric lacerations in 3, esophageal lacerations in 2, and bougie dilator perforations in 3). All lacerations were repaired intraoperatively except for one that was not recognized until postoperative day 2. Vagus nerve injuries occurred in at least three patients. Three delayed perforations occurred in the postoperative period (4%) (2 gastric and 1 esophageal). Two patients had pulmonary complications, two had gastroparesis, and one had fever of unknown origin. Seven patients required reoperation for gastroparesis (n = 2), dysphagia after mesh hiatal closure of the hiatus (n = 1), or recurrent herniation (n = 4). There were two deaths (3%): one from septic complications and one from myocardial infarction. Paraesophageal hernia repair took significantly longer (3.7 hours) than standard fundoplication (2.5 hours) in a concurrent series (P <0.05). Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair is feasible but challenging. The overall complication rate, although significant, is lower than that for nonsurgically managed paraesophageal hernia.

Minimally invasive surgery of the esophagus and stomach.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive surgery has assumed an ever-expanding role in gastrointestinal surgery since the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This review describes some of the more common minimally invasive procedures of the esophagus and stomach, with particular attention to technique. DATA SOURCES: A literature review of minimally invasive surgery of the esophagus and stomach was conducted. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic (and thoracoscopic) approaches for gastroesophageal reflux disease appear to have excellent operative and short-term follow-up results. Long-term follow-up data, however, remain unobtainable for several more years. Limited reports of esophageal cardiomyotomy, paraesophageal hernia repair, and gastric surgery for peptic ulcer disease performed through a minimally invasive approach are encouraging. Experience with resection of esophageal and gastric neoplasia is limited to a few specialized centers. Results should be scrutinized and compared with open operation before proclaiming the benefits of a minimally invasive approach.

Nissen and Toupet fundoplications effectively inhibit gastroesophageal reflux irrespective of natural anatomy and function.

BACKGROUND: The physiology of Nissen fundoplication (NF) and Toupet fundoplication (TF) is controversial. The aim of this study was to determine the contribution of elevated intragastric pressure to the antireflux mechanism after surgically created fundoplication in explanted porcine stomachs. METHODS: The stomachs and 6-8 cm of distal esophagus were removed from 15 pigs and placed in anatomic position. Five NF, 2 cm in length with three interrupted sutures, were performed, taking full-thickness bites of stomach and partial-thickness bites of esophagus around a 60 French dilator. Five 270 degree TF 2 cm in length with six interrupted sutures were performed taking full-thickness bites of stomach and partial-thickness bites of esophagus around a 60 French dilator. Each stomach served as its own control. The pylorus was tied off and the stomach was inflated with Ringer's lactate while the pressure was monitored. RESULTS: Before NF, reflux could be easily induced with a mean intragastric pressure of 5.5 +/- 3.7 mmHg. After NF reflux could not be induced but the sutures pulled out of the stomach at a mean pressure of 36.8 +/- 11.7 mmHg (p<0.01 vs control). Before TF, reflux could easily be induced with a mean intragastric pressure of 3.0 +/- 3.0 mmHg. After TF, reflux could not be induced and the sutures pulled out of the esophagus or stomach with a mean pressure of 30.8 +/- 9.0 mmHg (p<0.01 vs control). Porcine stomachs in vivo are resistant to reflux, but when explanted they reflux easily. NF and TF are so effective at interrupting reflux that the sutures tear out instead of allowing reflux. CONCLUSIONS: While not yet statistically significant, it appears that sutures tear out of the esophagus (TF) more readily than they tear out of the stomach (NF). TF and NF prevent reflux in the absence of anatomic or functional components of the lower esophageal sphincter.

Evaluation and management of postfundoplication dysphagia.

OBJECTIVES: Persistent dysphagia occurs in 3-24% of patients after fundoplication. There are virtually no data on the success or safety of endoscopic dilation to relieve postfundoplication dysphagia. The aim of this study was to review our experience with endoscopic management of patients with dysphagia after fundoplication. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-five patients (mean age 49 yr; 12 males, 23 females) with dysphagia after fundoplication were referred for endoscopic dilation. Twenty-nine patients had undergone one fundoplication (group A), and six patients had undergone two or more operations (group B). The integrity of the fundoplication was evaluated by barium esophagram and upper endoscopy. Median follow-up after the initial postoperative dilation was 13 months. RESULTS: The 29 patients in group A were dilated to a mean (+/- SD) of 52 +/- 4F during a mean (+/- SD) 1.9 +/- 1.1 dilation sessions per patient. No complications, such as disruption of the fundoplication, resulted from endoscopic dilation, and no one developed new reflux symptoms. Dysphagia resolved in 15 (52%) patients after dilation. The most important prognostic feature was endoscopic or radiological evidence of a slipped fundoplication. Dilation was successful in relieving dysphagia in only three of 11 (27%) patients with a slipped fundoplication, compared with 12 of 18 (67%) patients with an intact fundoplication (p = 0.05). Dysphagia resolved in only one of the six patients in group B. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic dilation is safe and often effective in patients with postfundoplication dysphagia. However, patients with a slipped fundoplication or who have undergone multiple fundoplications respond poorly to endoscopic dilation.

Laparoscopic antireflux surgery.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease is very common, and there continues to be a need for gastroesophageal reflux surgery despite improved medical therapy. With the relatively new option of laparoscopic antireflux surgery, many more of these procedures are now being performed. In order to perform these well, one must select patients carefully, evaluate them fully, and adhere to the technical principles required to achieve consistently good results.

A physiologic approach to laparoscopic fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease.

OBJECTIVE: The authors examined indications, evaluations, and outcomes after laparoscopic fundoplication in patients with gastroesophageal reflux through this single-institution study. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Laparoscopic fundoplication has been performed for less than 5 years, yet the early and intermediate results suggest that this operation is safe and equivalent in efficacy to open techniques of antireflux surgery. METHODS: Over a 4-year period, 300 patients underwent laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (252) or laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication (48) for gastroesophageal reflux refractory to medical therapy or requiring daily therapy with omeprazole or high-dose H2 antagonists. Preoperative evaluation included symptom assessment, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, 24-hour pH evaluation, and esophageal motility study. Physiologic follow-up included 24-hour pH study and esophageal motility study performed 6 weeks and 1 to 3 years after operation. RESULTS: The most frequent indication for surgery was the presence of residual typical and atypical gastroesophageal reflux symptoms (64%) despite standard doses of proton pump inhibitors. At preoperative evaluation, 51% of patients had erosive esophagitis, stricture, or Barrett's metaplasia. Ninety-eight percent of patients had an abnormal 24-hour pH study. Seventeen percent had impaired esophageal motility and 2% had aperistalsis. There were four conversions to open fundoplication (adhesions, three; large liver, one). Intraoperative technical difficulties occurred in 19(6%) patients and were dealt with intraoperatively in all but 1 patient (bleeding from enlarged left liver lobe). Minor complications occurred in 6% and major complications in 2%. There was no mortality. Median follow-up was 17 months. One year after operation, heartburn was absent in 93%. Four percent took occasional H2 antagonists, and 3% were back on daily therapy. Atypical reflux symptoms (e.g., asthma, hoarseness, chest pain, or cough) were eliminated or improved in 87% and no better in 13%. Overall patient satisfaction was 97%. Four patients have subsequently undergone laparotomy for repair of gastric perforation (1 year after operation), severe dumping, "slipped" Nissen, and repair of acute paraesophageal herniation. Two patients had laparoscopic revision of herniated fundoplications. Results of follow-up 24-hour pH studies were normal in 91% of patients more than 1 year after operation. In patients with poor esophageal motility, esophageal body pressure improved 1 year after operation in 75% and worsened in 10%. CONCLUSIONS: Although long-term efficacy data are lacking, intermediate follow-up shows laparoscopic fundoplication to be safe and effective. A physiologic approach to evaluation and follow-up of patients with gastroesophageal disease allows the surgeon to tailor antireflux surgery to esophageal body function and follow the function of the fundoplication and esophagus after operation.

Clinical features of type III (mixed) paraesophageal hernia.

OBJECTIVES: The clinical presentation of patients with a paraesophageal hernia is poorly understood. The aim of this study was to evaluate the progression of symptoms in patients with type III paraesophageal hernia. METHODS: We evaluated 25 patients (mean age 66 yr) with a type III paraesophageal hernia, who then had laparoscopic surgical repair. The patients characterized their symptoms as 1) chronic or 2) prompting evaluation (progressive or new). We defined postprandial distress as chest or epigastric pain, shortness of breath, or nausea or vomiting during or shortly after meals. RESULTS: We identified three distinct types of chronic symptoms: heartburn only (36%), heartburn and postprandial distress (32%), and postprandial distress only (32%). Twenty-three patients (92%) reported postprandial distress as the symptom prompting evaluation compared with only 10 patients (40%) reporting heartburn. Eight patients (32%) never had heartburn. Postprandial distress was their only symptom. Laparoscopic repair of the paraesophageal hernia resolved postprandial distress in 74% and improved symptoms in the remaining 26% of patients (mean follow-up 12 months). CONCLUSIONS: Post-prandial distress is the most prominent symptom in patients with a type III paraesophageal hernia. Most patients had chronic symptoms of a sliding hiatal hernia but later featured more pronounced postprandial distress. However, one-third of the patients never experienced significant heartburn. A type III paraesophageal hernia should be suspected in patients, with or without heartburn, who develop new or progressive symptoms of postprandial distress.

Intermediate follow-up of laparoscopic antireflux surgery.

BACKGROUND: Open antireflux surgery is an established long-term treatment for chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease. Short-term results of laparoscopic antireflux surgery are excellent, but long-term follow-up is not yet available. METHODS: Twenty-four-hour ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring and symptom scores were collected prior to laparoscopic antireflux surgery and 6 weeks postoperatively. These studies were repeated in an unselected cohort of patients 1 to 3 years after operation. RESULTS: One hundred patients who were > 1 year from surgery at the time of the present study volunteered for intermediate follow-up symptom assessment, and 35 also completed repeat 24-hour monitoring. The median interval after surgery among these volunteers was 17 months. Thirty-three (94%) had a normal pH study, which correlated with improvements in symptom scores. One patient had an abnormal pH study but no reflux symptoms, and 1 patient with an abnormal study developed recurrent symptoms of reflux after an episode of vomiting 11 months postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: The intermediate-term results of laparoscopic fundoplication suggest that long-term efficacy of this operation will be equivalent to open fundoplication.

Teaching basic video skills as an aid in laparoscopic suturing.

BACKGROUND: There is a perception among surgeons that performing laparoscopic suturing is unduly difficult. The purpose of this study is to document a program which aides in learning laparoscopic suturing. METHODS: Fourteen volunteer medical students without prior experience were taught laparoscopic suturing. Videoscopic pelvitrainers were utilized for a 2-h training session. Extracorporeal and intracorporeal knot tying was demonstrated utilizing a three-throw square knot. After a 2-h practice session each student's time to complete an extracorporeal and intracorporeal suture was recorded. RESULTS: The average times required for completion were: extracorporeal suture and knot 1 min 54 s; intracorporeal suture and knot 3 min 12 s. CONCLUSIONS: Novice students were able to perform at extra and intracorporeal suturing with 2 h of practice, utilizing a systematic program of teaching basic video skills.

New technology for the division of short gastric vessels during laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. A prospective randomized trial.

Division of the short gastric vessels (SGV) is a standard component of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplications (LNF) at our institution. This study compares our original method of vessel control, multifire clip applier (MCA) and sharp division, to the Ultracision Harmonic Scalpel LCS (LCS). Twenty consecutive patients were evaluated in a randomized prospective fashion. Times for SGV division and estimated blood loss (EBL) were recorded. Cost data represent patient charges for use of either the MCA or LCS and the charge for operative time. Use of the LCS produced a significant reduction in the time required for SGV division and in the charges to the patient. [table: see text] We feel it is important to divide the SGV in all LNFs, and LCS use can result in significant savings of time and money.