Comparing Outcomes of Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Among Patients With Angle-closure Glaucoma.

PURPOSE: Compare outcomes of tube shunt surgery (Tube) and trabeculectomy with mitomycin C (Trab-MMC) in patients with angle-closure glaucoma (ACG). DESIGN: Retrospective nonrandomized comparative study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 80 eyes from 80 patients with ACG who underwent either Tube (N = 50) or Trab-MMC (N = 30) between January 2015 and January 2022 at Massachusetts Eye and Ear. METHODS: Reviewed and analyzed 390 visits from patient charts. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Kaplan-Meier (KM) success rates, intraocular pressure (IOP), medication burden, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), adjusted hazard ratios (HRs), and complications. RESULTS: Baseline demographics were similar between both groups, except for a higher proportion of patients with pseudophakia and prior incisional ocular surgery in the Tube group. The Trab-MMC procedure had significantly higher KM complete success (CS) rates than the Tube procedure, but similar qualified success (QS) rates. Under QS, the cumulative probability of survival was 87% in the Tube group and 83% in the Trab-MMC group at year 1 (P = 0.77), and 75% in the Tube group and 58% in the Trab-MMC group at year 2 (P = 0.14). Under CS, the cumulative probability of survival was 13% in the Tube group and 59% in the Trab-MMC group at year 1 (P < 0.001), and 11% in the Tube group and 41% in the Trab-MMC group at year 2 (P < 0.001). Both Tube and Trab-MMC procedures resulted in significant patterns of IOP and medication reduction from baseline up to 2 years with mean IOP reduced to 12.6 ± 5.9 mmHg on 2.8 ± 1.4 medications after Tube and 12.1 ± 6.6 mmHg on 2.4 ± 1.7 medications after Trab-MMC. Patients who underwent Trab-MMC required less IOP-lowering medications at every follow-up visit up to year 1, but a similar number at year 2. No significant differences were found in IOP reduction, BCVA, or complication rates between groups. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that Trab-MMC confers similar IOP reduction and QS rates to Tube placement in patients with ACG. Trab-MMC, however, demonstrated greater medication burden reduction up to 1 year, and more favorable CS rates up to 2 years, while still maintaining similar complication rates to Tube. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Comparing Outcomes of 45 µm Gelatin Stent Placed ab Externo with Open Conjunctiva to ab Externo with Closed Conjunctiva.

PURPOSE: Compare outcomes of a gelatin stent (XEN45 Gel Stent [XGS]) placed either ab externo with open conjunctiva (AEO) or ab externo with closed conjunctiva (AEC) with or without cataract surgery in patients with glaucoma. DESIGN: Retrospective nonrandomized comparative study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 86 eyes from 86 glaucoma patients who received XGS placed either AEO (N = 49) or AEC (N = 37) with or without cataract surgery between May 2019 and April 2022 at Massachusetts Eye and Ear. METHODS: Reviewed and analyzed 809 visits from patient charts from a level 3 triage center. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Intraocular pressure (IOP), medication burden, Kaplan-Meier (KM) success rates, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) impact, and complications. RESULTS: Baseline demographics were similar between both groups, except for baseline IOP and glaucoma type. Both AEO and AEC procedures resulted in significant patterns of IOP and medication reduction from baseline up to 1 year. The AEO procedure had significantly higher KM qualified success (QS) rates than the AEC procedure, but similar complete success (CS) rates. Under QS, the cumulative probability of survival was 73% in the AEO group and 51% in the AEC group at month 6 and 62% in the AEO group and 20% in the AEC group at year 1. Under CS, the cumulative probability of survival was 41% in the AEO group and 37% in the AEC group at month 6 and 29% in the AEO group and 14% in the AEC group at year 1. The AEO procedure had significantly more IOP reduction than the AEC procedure at all postoperative time points beyond week 2, but similar medication burden reduction. At postoperative year 1 (POY1), the mean IOP was reduced to 10.72 ± 5.71 mmHg on 1.16 ± 1.68 medications after AEO and 17.03 ± 2.37 mmHg on 1.59 ± 1.21 medications after AEC. Phacoemulsification (phaco) was not a significant factor while 5-FU usage trended toward significance. Procedure time was longer for standalone XGS AEO. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that both placements reduce medication and IOP from baseline, with AEO placement having more favorable XGS success rates and IOP control at the expense of longer procedure time and greater 5-FU usage. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Comparing Outcomes of 45 Xen Implantation Ab Interno With Closed Conjunctiva to Ab Externo With Open Conjunctiva Approaches.

PRCIS: Ab externo with open conjunctiva placement may lead to improved gelatin stent (XEN Gel Stent; Allergan) success rate compared with ab interno with closed conjunctiva because it conferred more favorable intraocular pressure (IOP) and medication burden reduction based on our complete and qualified success criteria. PURPOSE: To compare outcomes of a gelatin stent (XEN 45 Gel Stent; Allergan) placed either ab interno with closed conjunctiva (AIC) or ab externo with open conjunctiva (AEO) with or without cataract surgery in patients with glaucoma. DESIGN: Retrospective, nonrandomized comparative study of 85 eyes from 85 glaucoma patients who received XEN 45 Gel Stent placed either AIC (N=32) or AEO (N=53) with or without cataract surgery between July 2018 and January 2022 at Massachusetts Eye and Ear. Patients were included if they were 18 years of age or above and had at least 30 days of follow-up without any disqualifying event. RESULTS: Baseline demographics were similar between both groups, except for the glaucoma type. Both AIC and AEO procedures resulted in significant patterns of IOP and medication reduction from baseline up to 1 year. At postoperative year (POY)1, mean IOP was reduced to 11.34±4 mmHg on 1.29±1.34 medications after AEO and 13.70±3.32 mmHg on 2±1.81 medications after AIC. The average IOP reduction was significantly greater in the AEO group at all postoperative time points beyond postoperative week 2. There were significant differences in the survival curves of AEO and AIC groups under both the complete success criteria and the qualified success criteria. Under the complete success criteria, the cumulative probability of survival at POY1 was 28.5% in the AEO group and 3.8% in the AIC group. Under the qualified success criteria, the cumulative probability of survival at POY1 was 60.3% in the AEO group and 21.9% in the AIC group. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, we demonstrate that both placements reduce IOP and medication from baseline, with AEO placement having more favorable success rates compared with AIC placement.

Comparing Outcomes of Trabeculotomy with Mitomycin C to 45-µm Gelatin Stent Placed Ab Externo with Open Conjunctiva.

PURPOSE: To compare trabeculectomy with mitomycin C (trab-MMC) and XEN45 Gel Stent placed ab externo with open conjunctiva (XGS AEO) with or without cataract surgery in patients with glaucoma. DESIGN: Nonrandomized, retrospective, comparative study. SUBJECTS: A total of 204 eyes from 204 glaucoma patients who received XGS AEO or underwent trab-MMC with or without cataract surgery between July 2018 and August 2021 at Massachusetts Eye and Ear. METHODS: Visits from 204 patient charts were reviewed after either trab-MMC or XGS AEO from 2018 to 2021 from a level 3 triage center. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Intraocular pressure (IOP), medication burden, Kaplan-Meier success rates, 5-fluorouracil impact, and complications. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-seven patients underwent trab-MMC and 47 underwent XGS AEO. Groups had similar baseline intraocular pressure (IOP) and medications (meds). Intraocular pressure and meds decreased similarly at 1.5 years (11.2 mmHg vs. 7.4 mmHg, P = 0.62; 2.9 vs. 2.8 meds, P = 0.92, respectively for trab-MMC and XGS AEO). Success was defined as IOP reduction ≥ 20% with 5 mmHg ≤ IOP ≤ 18 mmHg for 2 consecutive visits. Complete success (CS) did not allow meds; qualified success (QS) allowed for ≤ baseline meds. When IOP fluctuations in the first 60 days were not counted as failures, CS was 43% for trab-MMC, about 8.5% higher than for XGS AEO (P < 0.01). Qualified success was similar between the groups (65%-67%). Procedure time was shorter for XGS AEO than trab-MMC (44 vs. 63 minutes, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: XEN45 Gel Stent AEO may provide similar benefits to trab-MMC, especially for patients who tolerate some meds, with shorter procedure times. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Comparing Outcomes of Phacoemulsification and Endocyclophotocoagulation with Either Dual Blade Goniotomy (PEcK) or Two Trabecular Stents (ICE2).

Purpose: To compare outcomes of phacoemulsification and endocyclophotocoagulation with either dual blade goniotomy (PEcK) or two trabecular stents (ICE2). Setting: Retrospective, nonrandomized comparative study from a level 3 triage center. Methods: One hundred and seventy charts and a total of 1294 visits were reviewed following either PEcK or ICE2 from 2018 to 2022. One hundred and twenty-eight patients had PEcK and 42 underwent ICE2. Patients with less than 30 days of follow-up were excluded. The mean follow-up time was 505 ± 308 days. Two Kaplan-Meier curves (KM) assessed survival with ≤ baseline medications while maintaining (1) [GIC - Goal IOP Criteria] IOP ≤ goal IOP or (2) [PRC - Percent Reduction Criteria] IOP reduction ≥ 20% with 5 mmHg ≤ IOP ≤ 21 mmHg for at least two consecutive visits. IOP and medication burden reduction were compared using a paired t-test. Results: Most patients were Caucasian (65%) and had mild-stage glaucoma (43%). The most common glaucoma type was primary open-angle glaucoma (58%). Average age was 72.2 years at the time of surgery. Mean preoperative IOP was 17.58 ± 4.98 mmHg on 3.00 ± 1.41 medications in PEcK and 15.36 ± 3.58 mmHg on 1.81 ± 1.11 medications in ICE2 (p = 0.015 for IOP; p < 0.001 for medications). Under GIC, the success rate was significantly higher in PEcK at POM6 (69% vs 46%, p < 0.001) and POY1 (63% vs 36%, p < 0.001). Under PRC, the success rate was significantly higher in PEcK at POM6 (73% vs 61%, p = 0.031) and POY1 (67% vs 50%, p = 0.028). Mean reductions at POY1 were 5.00 ± 4.31 mmHg on 1.35 ± 1.08 less medications after PEcK and 3.14 ± 2.83 mmHg on 1.01 ± 0.94 less medications after ICE2 (p < 0.001 at POY1 for IOP; p < 0.05 after POW6 for medications). Conclusion: Both PEcK and ICE2 reduce medication and IOP from baseline, with PEcK having more favorable GIC and PRC success rates and greater IOP and medication reduction at 1 year.

Combined MIGS: Comparing Additive Effects of Phacoemulsification, Endocyclophotocoagulation, and Kahook Dual Blade.

Purpose: Combining two or more MIGS (cMIGS) promises to be more efficacious than single MIGS (sMIGS). This study compared the efficacy of PEcK, which combines Phacoemulsification (Phaco), Endocyclophotocoagulation (ECP), and Kahook dual blade (KDB), relative to both of its constituent sMIGS, Phaco/ECP (Endo Optiks, NJ) and Phaco/KDB (New World Medical, CA) for the first time. Patients and methods: Data was collected retrospectively from 1833 visits of 271 patients who underwent PEcK, Phaco/ECP, or Phaco/KDB from 2016-2021 at Massachusetts Eye and Ear. Primary outcomes included Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) of intraocular pressure (IOP) and medication burden, as well as survival models. Results: Mean preoperative IOP was 17.6 ± 5.0 (SD) mmHg on 3.0 ± 1.4 medications in the PEcK group (n = 128), 17.9 ± 5.1 mmHg on 2.2 ± 1.5 medications in the Phaco/ECP group (n = 78), and 16.1 ± 4.3 mmHg on 0.4 ± 1.0 medications in the Phaco/KDB group (n = 65). For more than 36 months, all procedures resulted in significant patterns of IOP and medication reduction (all p < 0.001), before and after statistical adjustment. The reduction pattern in IOP was significantly different when comparing all groups over time and favored PEcK (p = 0.04), but the reduction pattern in medications was not significantly different (p = 0.11). Procedures did not differ in procedural time (p = 0.18) or in survival to maintain ≥20% IOP reduction (p = 0.43) without additional medication or procedure. There was a trend toward significant difference in maintaining IOP ≤ goal IOP that favored PEcK over Phaco/ECP after adjustment (p = 0.09). Conclusion: PEcK may confer greater IOP reduction without added procedural time compared to Phaco/ECP and Phaco/KDB in predominantly mild or moderate glaucoma. Further research on cMIGS may benefit from adopting this comparative analysis to constituent MIGS.