Comparative safety of oral Janus kinase inhibitors and dupilumab in patients with atopic dermatitis: a population-based cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Systemic Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) and dupilumab both have emerged as promising therapeutics for atopic dermatitis (AD). While dupilumab has a favorable safety profile, use of oral JAKi has been established in other diseases that carry potential comorbid susceptibilities that influence safety. OBJECTIVE: To provide real-world evidence of the safety of oral JAKi in AD patients. METHODS: The study used observational data from TriNetX (Cambridge, Massachusetts). Patients with AD treated with either oral JAKi (upadacitinib, abrocitinib, and baricitinib) or dupilumab were enrolled. The two treatment groups were propensity-score matched 1:1 based on demographics, comorbidities, and prior medications. Safety outcomes within two years after the initiation of medications were measured by hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: A total of 14,716 patients were included, with 942 patients treated with oral JAKi and 13,774 with dupilumab. The two treatment groups included 938 patients after matching. Treatment with oral JAKi was not associated with increased risks of mortality, malignancies, major adverse cardiovascular events, venous thromboembolism, renal events, or serious gastrointestinal events. However, patients receiving oral JAKi showed significantly higher risks of skin and subcutaneous tissue infection, herpes infection, acne, cytopenia, and hyperlipidemia, whereas the risk of ophthalmic complications was higher in those receiving dupilumab. CONCLUSION: This study found that oral JAKi did not exhibit concerning safety issues in treating patients with AD but increased the risk of infections and laboratory abnormalities. Long-term follow-up data are required to validate these findings.

Melanoma-like features in pediatric longitudinal melanonychia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric longitudinal melanonychia (LM) can exhibit atypical features that mimic red-flag signs for subungual melanoma in adults and lead to diagnostic uncertainty. Nail biopsy may be unnecessary if clinical inspection and dermoscopy suggest a benign nature. METHODS: We searched PubMed and Embase from inception to February 2023 for studies of any design reporting either the number or proportion of clinical and dermoscopic features in at least five children (≤18 years) with LM. Non-English articles, reviews, and abstracts were excluded. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to collate all existing data. RESULTS: A total of 1218 articles were screened and 24 studies with 1391 pediatric patients were included. Nevus was the most common diagnosis (86.3%). The most prevalent sites were fingernails (76.2%) and first digits (45.4%). Pooled proportions of common features were: dark-color bands (69.8%), multi-colored bands (47.6%), broad bandwidth (41.1%), pseudo-Hutchinson sign (41.0%), irregular patterns (38.1%), Hutchinson sign (23.7%), dots and globules (22.5%), nail dystrophy (18.2%), and triangular sign (10.9%). Outcomes included progression (widening or darkening, 29.9%), stability (23.3%), and spontaneous regression (narrowing or fading, 19.9%). Only eight cases of subungual melanoma in situ were reported, and no invasive melanomas were identified. CONCLUSION: Although atypical characteristics are common in pediatric LM, the probability of malignant transformation is exceedingly low. Appropriate evaluation and management of pediatric LM includes careful clinical and dermoscopic inspection with attention to benign features followed by long-term interval follow-up.

Updates in the Management of Congenital Melanocytic Nevi.

Congenital melanocytic nevi (CMN) carry an increased risk of melanoma and may be disfiguring, and consensus regarding treatment recommendations is lacking. While clinical monitoring is the standard of care, many caregivers are interested in its removal to prevent psychosocial burden or to decrease risk. Although melanoma can occur regardless of CMN removal, there are a variety of treatments that may offer improved cosmesis or local symptom control, including surgical excision, laser therapy, and other superficially destructive techniques. Regardless of the selected management, these patients are monitored for ongoing melanoma risk. An extensive discussion with families regarding the risks and benefits of observation versus active intervention is essential. To facilitate these discussions, we herein summarize current CMN management strategies and considerations.